No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 September 2014
1 Panikkar, Raimundo, “The Jordan, the Tiber, and the Ganges: Three Kairological Moments of Christie Self-Consciousness” in Hick, John and Knitter, Paul F., eds., The Myth of Christian Uniqueness: Toward a Pluralistic Theology of Religions (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1987), 110.Google Scholar
2 Knitter, Paul F., No Other Name? A Critical Survey of Christian Attitudes toward World Religions (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1985).Google Scholar
3 Soelle, Dorothee, Strength of the Weak: Toward a Christian Feminist Identity (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1984), 66.Google Scholar See also the soon to be published study of Mark Kline Taylor that seeks to balance theological concern for pluralism with that for domination and oppression: Remembering Esperanza: A Cultural-Political Theology for North American Praxis (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1990)Google Scholar, ch. 1.
4 Tomko, Cardinal Josef, “Missionary Challenges to the Theology of Salvation,” Omnis Terra (Pontifical Missionary Union), December, 1988, 541–53.Google Scholar
5 Thompson, William M., “Jesus' Unsurpassable Uniqueness: A Theological Note,” Horizons 16 (1989): 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 See the essays of Ruether, Panikkar, Hick, Samartha, Driver, Yagi, Pieris, in Hick, and Knitter, , eds., The Myth of Christian Uniqueness; Michael AmaladossGoogle Scholar, “Faith Meets Faith,” Vidyajyoti 49 (1985): 109–17Google Scholar, and “Dialogue and Mission: Conflict or Convergence?” Vidyajyoti 50 (1986): 62–86;Google ScholarWilfred, Felix, “Dialogue Grasping for Breath? Towards New Frontiers in Interreligious Dialogue,” Federation of Asian Bishops Papers, No. 49 (1987), 35–52;Google ScholarSwidler, Leonard, “Interreligious and Interideological Dialogue: The Matrix for all Systematic Reflection Today” in Swidler, Leonard, ed., Toward a Universal Theology of Religion (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1987), 32–45;Google ScholarSchillebeeckx, Edward, “The Religious and the Human Ecumene” in Ellis, Marc E. and Maduro, Otto, eds., The Future of Liberation Theology: Essays in Honor of Gustavo Gutierrez (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1989), 177–86.Google Scholar
7 Viladesau, Richard, Answering for Faith: Christ and the Human Search for Salvation (New York: Paulist, 1987), 242–45.Google Scholar
8 Schillebeeckx, 179-80, 182.
9 Thompson, William M., The Jesus Debate (New York: Paulist, 1985), 388–93.Google Scholar He “corrects” (I would also say, “retracts”) this position in his Horizons essay cited in note 5.
10 Dulles, Avery, The Resilient Church: The Necessity and Limits of Adaptation (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1977), 78;Google ScholarKüng, Hans, “Toward an Ecumenical Theology of Religions: Some Theses for Clarification,” Concilium 183 (1986): 119–25;Google Scholarvan Beeck, Franz Josef, Christ Proclaimed: Christology as Rhetoric (New York: Paulist, 1979), 389;Google ScholarBaum, Gregory, “The Grand Vision: It Needs Social Action” in Lonergan, Anne and Richards, Caroline, eds., Thomas Berry and the New Cosmology (Mystic, CT: Twenty-Third, 1987), 4.Google Scholar
11 Dunne, John S., The Way of All the Earth (New York: Macmillan, 1972), 38–49.Google Scholar
12 Gilkey, Langdon, “Plurality and Its Theological Implications” in Hick, and Knitter, , eds., The Myth of Christian Uniqueness, 46–48.Google Scholar
13 Knitter, Paul F., “Dialogue and Liberation: Foundations for a Pluralist Theology of Religions,” The Drew Gateway 58 (1988): 1–53.Google Scholar