¹ See O'Brien, David, Public Catholicism (New York: Macmillan, 1989), 244–52.Google Scholar Literature on the public theology debate is voluminous; see inter alia Christiansen, Drew, “The Common Good and the Politics of Self-interest: A Catholic Contribution to the Practice of Citizenship” in Gelpi, Donald, ed., Beyond Individualism (Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 1989), 54–86;Google ScholarColeman, John, An American Strategic Theology (New York: Paulist, 1982)Google Scholar, and “A Possible Role for Biblical Religion in Public Life,” Theological Studies 40 (1979): 701–06;Google ScholarCurran, Charles E., American Catholic Social Ethics (Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Pres, 1982);Google ScholarHehir, J. Bryan, “Church-State and Church-World: The Ecclesiological Implications” in Kilcourse, George, ed., Catholic Theology in North American Context: Current Issues in Theology 1 (Macon, GA: CTSA/Mercer University Press, 1987), 54–74Google Scholar, and “The Perennial Need for Philosophical Discourse,” Theological Studies 40 (1979): 710–13;Google ScholarHollenbach, David, “Public Theology in America: Some Questions for Catholicism after John Courtney Murray,” Theological Studies 37 (1976): 290–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Hollenbach, , ed., “Theology and Philosophy in Public: A Symposium on John Courtney Murray's Unfinished Agenda,” Theological Studies 40 (1979): 700–15;Google ScholarLovin, Robin, “Resources for a Public Theology” in Hollenbach, , ed., “Symposium,” 706–10;Google ScholarMcBrien, Richard, Caesar's Coin: Religion and Politics in America (New York: Macmillan, 1987);Google ScholarMcElroy, Robert W., The Search for An American Public Theology (New York: Paulist, 1989);Google Scholar and O'Brien, David, “American Catholics and American Society,” in Murnion, Philip J., ed., Catholics and Nuclear War (New York: Crossroad, 1983), 16–29.Google Scholar

² See McBrien, , Caesar's Coin, esp. 98–100;Google ScholarChristiansen, , “Common Good,” 80;Google ScholarMcCann, Dennis, “The Good To Be Pursued in Common” in Williams, Oliver F. and Houck, John W., eds., The Common Good and U.S. Capitalism (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1987), 158–78Google Scholar, New Experiments in Democracy (Kansas City, MO: Sheed & Ward, 1987)Google Scholar, and (with Charles R. Strain), Polity and Praxis: A Program for American Practical Theology (Minneapolis: Winston, 1985);Google Scholar and Weigel, George, Catholicism and the Renewal of American Democracy (New York: Paulist, 1989), 8–9, 93, 107, 118–20, 206.Google Scholar

³ McElroy, , Search, 7.Google Scholar See also Coleman, , American Strategic, 97–103;Google ScholarHehir, , “Perennial,” 710–13;Google ScholarHennelly, Alfred, Theology for a Liberating Church (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1989);Google ScholarMcBrien, , Caesar's Coin, 98–99;Google ScholarO'Brien, , “American Catholics and American Society,” 16–29;Google ScholarPublic Theology, 227; Weigel, , Catholicism and the Renewal of American Democracy, 10, 84, 93–98Google Scholar (Weigel argues that Murray ought to be seen as a new “vital center” for American public theology).

⁴ McCann, , New Experiments, 23.Google Scholar On social justice as participation, see National Conference of Catholic Bishops, Economic Justice for All (Washington, DC: USCC, 1986), 68–76.Google Scholar

⁵ McCann, , New Experiments, 101-02, 121.Google Scholar

⁶ Ibid., 121. On McCann's civil discourse model as a consensual model, see also 47; and Polity and Praxis, 36, 56, 153.

⁷ Ibid., 13. For the authors' concern with ideological distortion of communication and the threat of ideological domination in public discourse, see 31-33, 57, 67-68, 84, 140, 157, 186.

⁸ Ibid., 54-56.

⁹ Ibid., On the need to allow the North American experience of cultural pluralism an active voice in public theology, see Polity and Praxis, 7, 9-10, 34-35, 220-21.

¹⁰ Ibid., 56. The reference is to Murray, John Courtney, We Hold These Truths (New York: Sheed & Ward, 1960), 17–35.Google Scholar

¹¹ Ibid., 91-121, esp. 114. For the theoretical foundation of this notion of civil discourse see Polity and Praxis, 50-57, 153-57.

¹² Ibid., 46-47, 56, 96.

¹³ Ibid., 47, 54.

¹⁴ Ibid., 96. See also 100. The Gustafson reference is “The Church: A Community of Moral Discourse,” in The Church as Moral Decision-Maker (Philadelphia: Pilgrim, 1970), 83–95.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Murray, , We Hold These Truths, 13.Google Scholar On Murray's belief that elaboration of a public consensus demanded an elite group, see McElroy, , Search, 67.Google Scholar

¹⁶ McCann, , New Experiments, 100Google Scholar, citing Habermas, , “Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativen Kompetenz,” Theorie des Gesellschaft oder Sozial-technologie: Was ieistet die Systemforschung? (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1971), 101–41.Google Scholar

¹⁷ McCann's appeal to Habermas underscores this reading of his appeal to Murray: he insists that Habermas' theory of communicative competence is framed precisely to eliminate ideological truth claims from public dialogue (98-100, see also Polity and Praxis, 50-57).

¹⁸ McCann, , New Experiments, 141.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Ibid., 140, citing Rasmussen, , “Economic Policy: Creation, Covenant and Community,” America 152 (1985): 365–67.Google Scholar

²⁰ McCann, , New Experiments, 141.Google Scholar

²¹ Ibid., 142.

²² Ibid.

²³ Weigel, , Catholicism and the Renewal of American Democracy, 8–9.Google Scholar

²⁴ Ibid., 104. Weigel does not acknowledge the source of the Neuhaus quote.

²⁵ Ibid., 107.

²⁶ Ibid., 115-16.

²⁷ Ibid., 118.

²⁸ Ibid., citing Murray, , We Hold These Truths, 26–27.Google Scholar

²⁹ Weigel, , Catholicism and the Renewal of American Democracy, 197.Google Scholar

³⁰ Ibid., 202-03, 206. Weigel notes (8) that his claim corroborates Neuhaus', Richard John “Catholic moment” thesis in his The Catholic Moment (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987).Google Scholar

³¹ Neuhaus' argument needs to be examined from the standpoint of ecclesiology. He appears to presume a two-kingdom theology that sees the church as somehow exempt from cultural conditioning: a church apart from culture speaks a word of judgment against the world. This theology does not deal adequately with the fact that the church is always incarnate in the world.

³² The metaphor of civil discourse as orchestration occurs in Polity and Praxis, 182.

³³ Rooney, Ellen, Seductive Reasoning; Pluralism as the Problematic of Contemporary Literary Theory (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989), 219–23.Google Scholar

³⁴ Ibid., 226-27.

³⁵ Will, George F., Statecraft as Soulcraft (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983), 37-41, 132–33.Google Scholar

³⁶ See Wills, Garry, Inventing America (New York: Vintage, 1979), 305.Google Scholar

³⁷ See above, n. 13.

³⁸ Weigel, , Catholicism and the Renewal of American Democracy, 17–19.Google Scholar McBrien also uses Madison to buttress the civil discourse idea (Caesar's Coin, 36).

³⁹ Burns, James MacGregor, The Deadlock of Democracy (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963), 337, 6;Google Scholar see also 323, 334.

⁴⁰ On the use of the federalist model as a theoretical basis for the antebellum slaveholding ethic in the American South, see Mathews, Donald G., Religion in the Old South (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977), 164–68.Google Scholar On the federalist emphasis on balance and order as a conservative emphasis arising out of the fear of social upheaval via revolutionary or Utopian ideologies, see May, Henry F., The Enlightenment in America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976), 254–58.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Drew Christiansen notes that Bell's notion of civitas parallels the civil discourse idea in contemporary public theology; he argues that the rejection of a politics of interest is the rejection of liberalism (“Common Good and Politics of Self-interest,” 59).

⁴² Bell, Daniel, The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism (New York: Basic, 1976), 26.Google Scholar

⁴³ Ibid., 25, 220-27, 232.

⁴⁴ Ibid., 245-51.

⁴⁵ Ibid., 245.

⁴⁶ Ibid., 250-51, 259.

⁴⁷ Ibid., 278.

⁴⁸ Ibid., 279-80.

⁴⁹ Cuddihy, John Murray, No Offense: Civil Religion and Protestant Taste (New York: Seabury, 1978), 90–92.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ On this, see McElroy, , Search, 162–64.Google Scholar On Murray's apocalyptic mentality regarding the possibility of ideological fragmentation in modern American society, see 72-73.

⁵¹ Curran, , American Catholic Social Ethics, 172, 230–31.Google Scholar McElroy has a similar, though less critical, evaluation of Murray's thought (Search, 168).

⁵² Cuddihy, , No Offense, 71, 78, 82.Google Scholar

⁵³ On Murray's belief that the elaboration of a public consensus demands an intellectual elite, see McElroy, , Search, 67;Google Scholar on Murray's contention that the cultural enterprise requires a cultural consensus, see 60-61.

⁵⁴ Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem (New York: Viking, 1965), 108–09.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Bakhtin, M. M., The Dialogic Imagination, ed. Holquist, Michael and trans. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981), 292.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Ibid., 279. See also 12.

⁵⁷ Clark, Katerina and Holquist, Michael, Mikhail Bakhtin (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984), 220.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Bakhtin, , Dialogue, 270.Google Scholar On church Latin as a unitary language that had to be repulsed for national languages to grow in the European middle ages, see 77.

⁵⁹ Ibid., 271.

⁶⁰ Ibid., 293.

⁶¹ Ibid., 346. See also 354.

⁶² Clark, and Holquist, , Bakhtin, 236–37.Google Scholar On Bakhtin's resistance to authoritative discourse, see 267.

⁶³ McElroy, , Search, 157.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Tracy, David, Plurality and Ambiguity (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987), 79.Google Scholar On the ideological nature of all discourse, see also 49, 61, 77.

⁶⁵ See above, n. 21.

⁶⁶ The WPA narratives first appeared in typescript: Federal Writers' Project, Slave Narratives: A Folk History of Slavery in the United States from Interviews with Former Slaves (Typewritten Records Prepared by the Federal Writers' Project, Washington, DC, 1941). In 1972, George Rawick issued the narratives in a nineteen-volume set entitled The American Slave: A Composite Biography (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1972).Google Scholar A selection of the narratives is in Yetman, Norman R., ed., Voices from Slavery (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970).Google Scholar On the value of slave narratives to historians (and on the failure of historians to use this source adequately), see Davis, Charles T. and Gates, Henry Louis Jr., The Slave's Narratives (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction, trans. Hurley, Robert (New York: Vintage, 1980), 101.Google Scholar See also The Foucault Reader, ed. Rabinow, Paul (New York: Pantheon, 1984), 56.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Ibid., 86. On the silence of the Other as constructed by authoritative discourses, see 27.

⁶⁹ Williams, Raymond, Marxism and Literature (New York: Oxford University Press, 1977), 112.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Tracy presents an impassioned argument against the notion that only a scholarly elite can interpret religious classics, and for the privilege of the Other in the hermeneutic process (Plurality and Ambiguity, 72, 102-07). See also Frank Kermode's insistence that the mark of the powerful critic is to undo marginalization by making the marginal central (Forms of Attention [Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985Google Scholar]).

⁷¹ Hooper, J. Leon, Ethics of Discourse: John Courtney Murray's Social Philosophy (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1986), 6-7, 199, 218–19.Google Scholar On Bakhtin's view that dialogism wars continually against a repressive monologism, and that monologism is a strategy to ignore and marginalize opposing discourses, see Hirschkop, Ken, “A Response to the Forum on Mikhail Bakhtin” in Morson, Gary Saul, ed., Bakhtin: Essays and Dialogues on His Work (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), 75.Google Scholar

⁷² Gilligan, Carol, “Preface,” in Gilligan, , et al., Mapping the Moral Domain (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988), i.Google Scholar

⁷³ Baudige, Betty, “Things so Finely Human: Moral Sensibilities at Risk in Adolescence” in Gilligan, , et al., Mapping, 108.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ On the battle for language as a central feminist political battle, see Rich, Adrienne, On Lies, Secrets, and Silence (New York: Norton, 1979), 16.Google Scholar Rich notes that Virginia Woolf battled against the stigmatization of women's voice as too “personal” (27).

⁷⁵ On this, see Williams, Raymond, Keywords, rev. ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983), 58.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ On this, see Hertzberg, Arthur, The French Enlightenment and the Jews: The Origins of Modern Anti-Semitism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1968).Google Scholar

⁷⁷ See Coleman, , American Strategic, 189–90Google Scholar, citing McWilliams, Wilson Carey, The Idea of Fraternity in America (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973), 172–73;Google ScholarBellah, Robert N., et al., Habits of the Heart (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), 154;Google Scholar and Bloom, Allan, The Closing of the American Mind (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987), 254.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ For a persuasive argument regarding the relativizing power of historical studies, see Yourcenar, Marguerite, With Open Eyes, Conversations with Matthieu Galey, trans. Goldhammer, Arthur (Boston: Beacon, 1980), 40.Google Scholar On the concept of civility in American life as a bourgeois formalism of the surface that refuses to ask questions about the power or interest of the civil, see Cuddihy, , No Offense, 92, 165, 210;Google Scholar and The Ordeal of Civility (New York: Basic, 1974), 9.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Pluralism and civility à la Murray are keynotes of McBrien's recent Caesar's Coin, for example, the book's index contains ten references to each.

⁸⁰ On the ways in which American use of shibboleth terms such as “community” and “justice” veils their actual meaning in cultural praxis, see Perin, Constance, Belonging in America: Reading between the Lines (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988), 227.Google Scholar On pluralism as “the reigning ideology of American politics,” see Mitchell, W. J. T., “Pluralism as Dogmatism,” Critical Inquiry 12 (1986): 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For a recent argument that we still need a critical historical study of the concept of pluralism in American culture, and for a survey of the literature, see Lasch, Christopher, The Minimal Self (New York: W. W. Norton, 1984), 264–65.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Rooney, , Seductive Reasoning, 242Google Scholar, quoting Gayatri Spivak, “A Response to Annette Kolodny,” unpublished manuscript, 2; italics in original. On the refusal of North American pluralists to ask questions about relations of power or real social relations, see Mitchell, , “Pluralism as Dogmatism,” 499.Google Scholar

⁸² Rooney, , Seductive Reasoning, 84, 110–11, 117, 137, 187.Google Scholar

⁸³ Ibid., 17.

⁸⁴ Ibid., 17-18.

⁸⁵ Ibid., 8-9, 26.

⁸⁶ Ibid., 62, 64-65.

⁸⁷ Baum, Gregory, “The Social Context of American Catholic Theology” in Kilcourse, , ed., Catholic Theology in North American Context, 92.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Coleman, , American Strategic, 255;Google Scholar see also, 3, 190-92, 255-58; and Tracy, , Plurality and Ambiguity, 31, 90.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ See above, nn. 18, 20.

⁹⁰ Bakhtin, , Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics (Minneapolis, 1984), 166CrossRefGoogle Scholar, quoted in Morson, Gary Saul, “Preface” in Morson, Gary Saul, ed., Bakhtin: Essays and Dialogues on His Work (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), xii.Google Scholar See also Bakhtin, , Dialogic, 7, 30.Google Scholar

⁹¹ Bloch, Ernst, The Principle of Hope, trans. Plaice, Neville, Stephen Plaice, and Paul Knight (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986), 1:4.Google Scholar The sentence is Bloch's epitaph. See also Tracy, , Plurality and Ambiguity, 18Google Scholar: “The movement in conversation is questioning itself.”

⁹² Quoted in Morson, “Preface,” ix; italics in original. See also Clark, and Holquist, , Bakhtin, 348.Google Scholar

⁹³ Tracy, , Plurality and Ambiguity, 20, 78.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Ibid., 79.

⁹⁵ Ibid., 26.

⁹⁶ McBrien, , Caesar's Coin, 194.Google Scholar On Boswell's, JohnChristianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980)Google Scholar as opening new vistas on our knowledge of the history of gay people and as opening the dialogue to these Others (see Tracy, , Plurality and Ambiguity, 71Google Scholar).

⁹⁷ See Boswell, , Christianity, Social Tolerance, 6–8, 38–39.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ On the careful “etiquette of speech” by which Southern whites reinforced segregation and avoided confronting the significance of their racism in the pre-integration period, see Berry, Wendell, The Hidden Wound, rev. ed. (San Francisco: North Point, 1989), 19.Google Scholar

⁹⁹ Hooper, , Ethics of Discourse, 220.Google Scholar See also Hooper's review of McElroy, Search, in Theological Studies 51 (1990): 164–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁰⁰ Hooper, , Ethics of Discourse, 221–22.Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ Ibid., 177-78.

¹⁰² Ibid., 11. See Murray, , We Hold These Truths, 45, 82, 99, 102.Google Scholar On vital traditions as embodying continuities of conflict and as communities of argument, see MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue, 2nd ed. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984), 222.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Murray, , We Hold These Truths, 133.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ On the necessity for prophetic and poetic discourse in a church that retains a strong and critical social ethic, see Brueggemann's, Walter masterful The Prophetic Imagination (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1978)Google Scholar and Finally Comes the Poet (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ Said, Edward W., The World, the Text, and the Critic (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983), 26.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ Gilligan, Carol, Ward, Janet Victoria, and Taylor, Jill McLean, “Afterword” in Gilligan, , ed., Mapping, 290.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ Perin, , Belonging in America, 169.Google Scholar Berry's Hidden Wound stresses the moral obligation of adults to retain a connection to childhood candor of vision (61).

¹⁰⁸ See, e.g., Gélin, Albert, The Poor of Yahweh (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1953).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Monika Hellwig maintains that one can speak of the meaning of hunger only via language that goes beyond the descriptive and seeks the evocative, for example, The Eucharist and the Hunger of the World (New York: Paulist, 1976), 13.Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ Williams, Raymond, Culture and Society, 1780-1950 (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1960), 354.Google Scholar