Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:58:38.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SECURING THE GARDEN AND LONGINGS FOR HEIMAT IN POST-WAR HANOVER, 1945–1948*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

ALEX D'ERIZANS*
Affiliation:
Borough of Manhattan Community College, CUNY
*
25 Crow Hill Rd, Mt Kisco, NY 10549alex.derizans@gmail.com

Abstract

Zeroing in on private garden plots, the article discusses the manner in which Germans portrayed themselves in relation to displaced persons (DPs) – former foreign workers, Allied prisoners-of-war (POWs), and concentration camp inmates – in immediate post-Second World War Hanover. Challenging the notion that a coherent narrative of German victimization truly emerged only in the 1950s, the article reveals how German gardeners already articulated loudly a discourse through which they sought to depict themselves as decent, hard-working sufferers, while portraying displaced persons as immoral and dangerous perpetrators. The plots of garden owners, as foci of German yearnings for Heimat, came particularly under threat. Germans cherished such sites, not only because they provided the opportunity for procuring additional sustenance amidst a post-war world of scarcity, but because they symbolized longings to inhabit a peaceful, productive, and beautiful space into which the most turbulent history could not enter, and upon which a stable future could be constructed. Only with the removal of DPs could Germans claim for themselves the status of victims, while branding DPs perpetrators, and reaffirm past patterns of superiority and inferiority in both ethical and racial terms. In so doing, Germans could realize the innocence integral for achieving Heimat and establish democratic stability after 1945.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to take this opportunity to extend particular thanks to Peter Fritzsche, Margarete Feinstein, Judith Fai-Podlipnik, as well as the anonymous reviewers of the manuscript, all of whom offered invaluable advice and criticism on multiple drafts of the article.

References

1 ‘Hannover-ein zweites Chicago: Die zunehmenden Raubueberfaelle beunruhigen die Bevoelkerung’, Hannoversche Volkstimme, 28 Mar. 1947, Stadtarchiv Hannover (StAH).

2 Dietrich Gahrmann, letter to Military Police, 30 July 1945, StAH, HR #2, #227.

3 For some recent examples, see Gregor, Neil, Haunted city: Nuremberg and the Nazi past (New Haven, CT, 2008)Google Scholar; Naumann, Klaus, ed., Nachkrieg in Deutschland (Hamburg, 2001)Google Scholar; Frei, Norbert, 1945 und wir: Das dritte Reich im Bewusstsein der Deutschen (Munich, 2005)Google Scholar; Behrenbeck, Sabine, ‘Between pain and silence: remembering the victims of violence in Germany after 1949’, in Bessel, Richard and Schumann, Dirk, eds., Life after death: approaches to a cultural and social history of Europe during the 1940s and 1950s (Cambridge, 2003), pp. 3764CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Giesen, Bernhard, Triumph and trauma (Boulder, CO, 2004), pp. 120–3Google Scholar.

5 Fulbrook, Mary, The divided nation: a history of Germany, 1918–1990 (New York, NY, 1992), p. 163Google Scholar.

6 Mitscherlich, Alexander and Mitscherlich, Margarete, The inability to mourn: principles of collective behavior, trans. Placzek, Beverley R. (New York, NY, 1975), p. xxivGoogle Scholar.

7 Adorno, Theodore W., ‘What does coming to terms with the past mean?’, in Hartman, Geoffrey, ed., Bitburg in moral and political perspective (Bloomington, IN, 1986), p. 124Google Scholar.

8 Saul Friedlaender, ‘Some German struggles with memory’, in Hartman, ed., Bitburg, p. 29.

9 Confino, Alon, ‘Traveling as a culture of remembrance: traces of national socialism in West Germany, 1945–1960’, History and Memory, 12 (2001), pp. 92121Google Scholar, at p. 2; Kapcyznski, Jennifer, ‘Heimatfilm and the specter of male violence’, German Studies Review, 33 (2010), pp. 305–30Google Scholar.

10 Moeller, Robert, ‘War stories: the search for a usable past in the Federal Republic of Germany’, American Historical Review, 101 (1996), pp. 1008–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 1012–13; Behrenbeck, ‘Between pain and silence’, p. 63; Jeffrey, Herf, Divided memory: the Nazi past in the two Germanys (Cambridge, 1997), pp. 112Google Scholar; Gregor, Haunted city, pp. 1–22.

11 Some historians have indeed already begun to probe this period for understanding post-war German memory. See, for example, Hilton, Laura, ‘The black market in history and memory: German perceptions of victimhood from 1945 to 1948’, German History, 28 (2010), pp. 479–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Badenoch, Alexander, Voices in ruins: West German radio across the 1945 divide (Basingstoke, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Confino, Alon and Fritzsche, Peter, ‘Introduction’, in Confino, and Fritztsche, , eds., The work of memory: new directions in the study of German society and culture (Urbana, IL, 2002), p. 14Google Scholar.

13 Behrenbeck, ‘Between pain and silence’, p. 40.

14 Schlink, Bernhard, Heimat als Utopie (Frankfurt and Main, 2000), p. 32Google Scholar; Draskau, Jennifer Kewley, ‘Relocating the Heimat: great war internment literature from the Isle of Man’, German Studies Review, 32 (2009), pp. 83106Google Scholar, at p. 103.

15 Wickham, Christopher J., Constructing Heimat in post-war Germany: longing and belonging (Lewiston, NY, 1999), pp. 7Google Scholar, 27–8, 53–4.

16 Hilton, ‘The black market in history and memory’, p. 479.

17 Applegate, Celia, A nation of provincials: the German idea of Heimat (Berkeley, CA, 1990), p. 6Google Scholar; Elizabeth Boa and Rachel Palfreyman, Heimat, a German dream: regional loyalties and national identity in German culture, 1890–1990 (Oxford, 2000), p. 183Google Scholar.

18 Blickle, Peter, Heimat: a critical theory of the German idea of homeland (New York, NY, 2002), p. 136Google Scholar.

19 Ibid., p. 148.

20 Ibid., p. 14.

21 Ibid., p. 125; Badenoch, Voices in ruins, p. 33.

22 Blickle, Heimat, p. 125.

23 Frei, Norbert, Adenauer's Germany and the Nazi past (New York, NY, 2002), pp. xixvCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Grossmann, Atina, Jews, Germans, and Allies: close encounters in Germany (Princeton, NJ, 2009), p. 11Google Scholar; Holian, Anna, Between national socialism and soviet communism: displaced persons in post-war Germany (Ann Arbor, MI, 2011), p. 271CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Grossmann, Atina, ‘Entangled histories and lost memories: Jewish survivors in occupied Germany, 1945–1949’, in Patt, Avinoam J. and Berkowitz, Michael, eds., ‘We are here’: new approaches to Jewish displaced persons in post-war Germany (Detroit, MI, 2010), pp. 1430Google Scholar, at pp. 15 (quote), 17.

26 Patt and Berkowitz, eds., ‘We are here’, pp. 1–13, at p. 6; Feinstein, Margarete Myers, Holocaust survivors in post-war Germany, 1945–1957 (Cambridge, 2010), p. 3Google Scholar; Grossmann, Jews, Germans, and Allies, p. 9.

27 Grossmann, ‘Entangled histories and lost memories’, pp. 14–30; Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, pp. 7, 41–3, 151–2.

28 Eder, Angelika, ‘Displaced persons/“Heimatlose auslaender” als Arbeitskraefte in Westdeutschland’, Archiv fuer Sozialgeschichte, 42 (2002), pp. 117Google Scholar, at pp. 7, 14; Wieleba, Zofia, ‘Die juedischen displaced persons – DPs in Deutschland nach 1945’, Kwartalnik Historii Zydow, 4 (2005), pp. 506–40Google Scholar; Koenigseder, Angelika and Wetzel, Juliane, Waiting for hope: Jewish displaced persons in post-World War II Germany (Evanston, IL, 1994), pp. 130–4Google Scholar, 199–201, 211–13; Grossmann, Jews, Germans, and Allies, pp. 164–7, 172–8; Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, pp. 11–63; Michael Berkowitz and Suzanne Brown-Fleming, ‘Perceptions of displaced persons as criminals in early post-war Germany: lingering stereotypes and self-fulfilling prophecies’, in Patt and Berkowitz, eds., ‘We are here’, pp. 167–93 , at pp. 168–9, 170–1, 174, 177–8, 185; Holian, Between national socialism, pp. 66–7, 70–3.

29 Hilton, ‘The black market in history and memory’, pp. 479–97; Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, pp. 6, 14, 101, 106, 303–5.

30 Stein, Hartwig, Inseln im Häusermeer: Eine Kulturgeschichte des deutschen Kleingartenwesens bis zum Ende des Zweiten Weltkriegs (New York, NY, 2000), pp. 51–4Google Scholar.

31 Gröning, Gert, Tendenzen im Kleingartenwesen (Stuttgart, 1974), p. 10Google Scholar.

32 Clark, Peter and Jauhiainen, Jussi S., ‘Introduction’, in Clark, , ed., The European city and green space: London, Stockholm, Helsinki and St. Petersburg, 1850–2000 (Burlington, VT, 2006), p. 17Google Scholar.

33 Das Bundesministerium fuer Verkehr, Bau, und Stadtentwicklung und Das Bundesamt fuer Bauwesen und Raumordnung, Staedtebauliche oekologische und soziale Bedeutung des Kleingartenwesens, Research Booklet 133 (Bonn, 2008), Preface.

34 Stein, Inseln im Häusermeer, p. 114.

35 Ibid., p. 167.

36 Katsch, Günter and Walz, Johann B., Kleingärten und Kleingärtner im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert: Bilder und Documente (Leipzig, 1996), pp. 1213Google Scholar; Warnecke, Peter, Laube, Liebe, Hoffnung (Berlin, 2001), pp. 30–2Google Scholar; Catharina Nolin, ‘Stockholm's urban parks: meeting places and social contexts from 1860–1930’, in Clark, ed., The European city, pp. 111–126, at pp. 121–2, 124; Katri Lento, ‘The role of nature in the city: green space in Helsinki, 1917–60’, in Clark, ed., The European city, pp. 188–206, at pp. 197–8, 205–6.

37 Museen, Saechsische, Deutsches Museum der Kleingärtnerbewegung Leipzig: Kleingärten und Kleingärtner im 19 und 20. Jahrhundert (Leipzig, 1996), pp. 17Google Scholar, 22.

38 Katsch and Walz, Kleingärten, pp. 30, 60; Warnecke, Laube, pp. 41–4.

39 Bodo Rollka and Volker Spiess, Berliner Laubenpieper: Kleingärten in der Grossstadt Berlin, 1987), pp. 27–9; Stein, Inseln im Häusermeer, pp. 238–9.

40 Stein, Inseln im Häusermeer, pp. 76–87; Saechsische Museen, Deutsches Museum, pp. 53–5; Katsch and Walz, Kleingärten, p. 30; Warnecke, Laube, pp. 38–41.

41 Gröning, Tendenzen im Kleingartenwesen, p. 10; Verk, Sabine, Laubenleben: Eine Untersuchung zum Gestaltungs-, Gemeinschafts- und Umweltverhalten von Kleingärten (Münster, 1994), p. 2Google Scholar.

42 Stürmer, Rainer, Freiflaechenpolitik in Berlin in der Weimarer Republik: Ein Beitrag zur Sozial- und Umweltschutzpolitik einer modernen Industriestadt ( Berlin, 1991), pp. 6Google Scholar, 11–13.

43 Clark and Jauhiainen, ‘Introduction’, p. 17.

44 Gröning, Tendenzen im Kleingartenwesen, p. 16; Stein, Inseln im Häusermeer, pp. 342–95, 503, 586–625; Warnecke, Laube, pp. 44–53, 56–74; Verk, Laubenleben, pp. 38–43.

45 Lewis, George K., ‘The Kleingärten: evolution of an urban retreat’, Landscape: A Magazine of Human Geography, 23 (1979), pp. 33–7Google Scholar; Gröning, Tendenzen im Kleingartenwesen, p. 20; Warnecke, Laube, pp. 121–32.

46 Report on Field Operations/Employment and Accn. DPs: use of DP Labour – Makeshift Meals, to: HQ 40 (Hann) Garrison, from: United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA) field supervisory officer c/o 102 Mil Gov Det BAOR, United Nations Archives and Records Management Section (UNARMS), S-0412–0005–03, UNRRA Germany mission, British zone – BAOR (British Army of the Rhine) – zone director's monthly narrative reports, 4 Jan. 1947.

47 Rollka and Spiess, Berliner Laubenpieper, pp. 50–2.

48 Deutsches Kleingaertnermuseum in Leipzig, Wie Hammonia zum Kleingärten kam: Eine kurze Geschichte des Hamburger Kleingärtenwesens von der Mitte des 19. bis zum Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts (Leipzig, 2000), p. 44Google Scholar (quote); Gröning, Tendenzen im Kleingartenwesen, p. 21; Verk, Laubenleben, pp. 43–8.

49 Deutsches Kleingaertnermuseum in Leipzig, Wie Hammonia zum Kleingarten kam, p. 44.

50 Grube, Frank and Richter, Gerhard, Die schwarZmarktzeit: Deutschland Zwischen 1945 und 1948 (Hamburg, 1979), p. 39Google Scholar.

51 Harrison, Robert Pogue, Gardens: an essay on the human condition (Chicago, IL, and London, 2008), p. ixCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Ibid., p. 48.

53 Palfreyman, Rachel, ‘Green strands on the silver screen? Heimat and environment in the German cinema’, in Goodbody, Axel, ed., The culture of German environmentalism: anxieties, visions, realities (New York, NY, and Oxford, 2002), pp. 172–3Google Scholar.

54 Ibid., p. 182.

55 Nollendorf, Cora Lee, ‘Fernweh-Heinweh: attitudes of German-Americans before 1900’, in Hermand, Jost and Steakley, James, eds., Heimat, nation, and fatherland: the German sense of belonging (New York, NY, 1996), p. 26Google Scholar.

56 Katsch and Walz, Kleingärten, p. 36.

57 Gröning, Gert and Wolschke-Bulmahn, Joachim, Von der Stadtgaertnerei zum Gruenflächenamt: 100 Jahre kommunale Freiflächenverwaltung und Gartenkultur in Hannover (Berlin and Hanover, 1990), p. 33Google Scholar.

58 Ibid., p. 122.

59 The Herrenhausen Gardens, located in Herrenhausen, an urban district of Hanover, are comprised of the Great Garden, the Berggarten, the Georgengarten and the Welfengarten.

60 In April 1946, British occupation authorities sought to alleviate the food crisis in their zone by championing self-sufficiency through the allocation of city green space, much of it in the form of garden plots, to citizens for the growth of foodstuffs, particularly vegetables. See Gröning and Wolschke-Bulmahn, Von der Stadtgärtnerei, p. 99.

61 Garden Director Hermann Wernicke, report on the Herrenhaeuser Gardens, StAH, Ablieferung Gartenamt, Ltd Nr 16.

62 Wolschke-Bulmahn, Joachim, ‘Ein Jahrhundert Kleingaerten in Hannover – eine Bereicherung der Stadtlandschaft’, in Berichte der naturhistorischen Gesellschaft Hannover, cxli (Hanover, 1999), p. 177Google Scholar; Deutsches Kleingaertnermuseum in Leipzig, Das Kleingartenwesen in den westlichen Besatzungszonen und in der Bundesrepublic Deutschland (Leipzig, 2000), p. 6Google Scholar.

63 Mylnek, Klaus, ‘Hannover in der Weimarer Republik und unter dem Nationalsozialismus’, in Brosius, Dieter et al. , eds., Geschichte der Stadt Hannover, ii: Vom Beginn des 19. Jahrhunderts bis in die Gegenwart (Hanover, 1994), p. 559Google Scholar.

64 Froebe, Rainer et al. , Konzentrationslager in Hannover: KZ-arbeit und Rüstungsindustrie in der Spätphase des Zweiten Weltkriegs, Part i (Hildesheim, 1985), pp. 1314Google Scholar.

65 Koberg, Heinz, Hannover 1945: Zerstoerung und Wiedergeburt: Bilddokumente eines Augenzeugen (Hanover, 1985), p. 42Google Scholar.

66 Hanover Department of Health, letter to mayor, 19 July 1945, StAH, HR #2, #203. A year later, the status of the city had not changed, as the British noted in an official ‘Report concerning DPs’, 1946, The National Archives (TNA), FO 1050/277.

67 Although US military forces would initially take the city, Hanover came under British control days later.

68 Tasch, Dieter, Hannover Zwischen null und Neubeginn (Hanover, 1985), p. 68Google Scholar.

69 Anschuetz, Janet and Heike, Irmtraud, Feinde im Eigenen Land (Hanover, 2000), p. 10Google Scholar.

70 For the case of Poles, see, for example, Hilton, Laura, ‘Cultural nationalism in exile: the case of Polish and Latvian displaced persons’, Historian, 71 (2009), pp. 304–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 British situation report, 14 July 45, StAH, HR #2, #993.

72 Anschuetz and Heike, Feinde, p. 81.

73 Patt and Berkowitz, eds., ‘We are here’, p. 7; Holian, Between national socialism, pp. 17–19, 270–2.

74 Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, p. 303, Slatt, Vincent E., ‘Nowhere to go: displaced persons in post-V-E-day Germany’, Historian, 64 (2002), p. 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

75 Slatt, ‘Nowhere to go’, p. 283.

76 Wyman, Mark, DP: Europe's displaced persons, 1945–1951 (Ithaca, NY, 1998), p. 157Google Scholar.

77 Ibid., p. 160.

78 Regarding such rituals among the Ukranians and Latvians, for example, see monthly report – displaced persons: Prisoner-of-War/Displaced Person (PW/DP) section. HQ Mil. Gov. Hanover Region, c/o HQ 30 corps district BAOR, Apr. 1946, TNA, FO 1010/101.

79 Wyman, DP: Europe's displaced persons, p. 158.

80 Hilton, ‘Cultural nationalism in exile’, p. 285 (first quote), p. 283 (second quote).

81 Hannover Muenden, 18 Feb. 1946; to: team director UNRRA 223; from: PWO/AWO UNRRA 221; subject: welfare activities for Basic Assembly Centre Report, UNARMS, S-0527–0201, UNRRA, British zone field offices.

82 Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, p. 9.

83 Grossmann, ‘Entangled histories and lost memories’, p. 20.

84 Ibid., p. 116; Atina Grossmann, ‘From victims to “homeless foreigners”: Jewish survivors in post-war Germany’, in Chin, Rita, Fehrenbach, Heide, Eley, Geoff, and Grossmann, Atina, eds., After the Nazi racial state: difference and democracy in Germany and Europe (Ann Arbor, MI, 2009), pp. 5579CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 57.

85 Survey on conditions of Jews in the British zone of Germany in Mar. 1946, TNA, FO 1040/1874; Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, pp. 151, 213; Grossman, ‘Entangled histories and lost memories’, p. 16.

86 Grossmann, Jews, Germans, and Allies, p. 176.

87 Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, p. 116; Grossmann, ‘Entangled histories and lost memory’, p. 17.

88 Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, p. 95; Berkowitz and Brown-Fleming, ‘Perceptions of displaced persons’, p. 181; Grossmann, Jews, Germans, and Allies, p. 62.

89 Wyman, DP: Europe's displaced persons, p. 41.

90 Grossmann, Jews, Germans, and Allies, p. 176.

91 Ibid., p. 177.

92 UNRRA Team 85, director M. N. Schipoff; DP Camp Hannover–Minden Hospital, Hannover–Minden, 9 Feb. 1946, Health and Medical Services, UNARMS, S-0527–0208, UNRRA, British zone field offices.

93 Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, p. 23.

94 Wyman, DP: Europe's displaced persons, pp. 52–4.

95 Ibid., pp. 167–8; Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, 112; Grossmann, Jews, Germans, and Allies, p. 176.

96 Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, p. 24, Grossmann, Jews, Germans, and Allies, p. 176.

97 Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, p. 5.

98 Ibid., pp. 6, 63.

99 de Certeau, Michel, The practice of everyday life, trans. Rendall, Steven (Berkeley, CA, 1988), pp. 77114Google Scholar; Neuberger, Joan, Hooliganism: crime, culture, and power in St. Petersburg, 1900–1914 (Berkeley, CA, 1993), p. 14Google Scholar.

100 Slatt, ‘Nowhere to go’, pp. 275–6; Koenigseder and Wetzel, Waiting for hope, pp. 28–30, 97.

101 Wyman, DP: Europe's displaced persons, pp. 38–61. Displaced persons, however, would need to notify camp authorities if they wished to transfer to and register at another facility.

102 Bauer, Ingrid, ‘“Von nuetzlichen und lästigen, erinnerten und vergessenen Fremden.” Besatzungssoldaten, displaced persons and das Österreichsche Gedächtnis’, Zeitgeschichte, 27 (2000), pp. 150–70Google Scholar, at pp. 163–5.

103 ‘Powers of German Police’, Secretariat, Headquarters, Company Command Group, BE, Berlin, BAOR to Control Office for Germany and Austria, London, 20 Jan. 1947, TNA, FO 945/700.

104 Webster, Ronald, ‘American relief and Jews in Germany, 1945–1960: diverging perspectives’, Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook, 38 (1993), pp. 293321CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 296–7.

105 Policy Instruction No. 2 concerning ‘treatment of displaced persons’, issued by Headquarters, Control Commission for Germany (British Element), 25 Nov. 1946, pp. 1–2, TNA, FO 1046/538; Hulme, Kathryn, The wild place (Boston, MA, 1953), p. 149Google Scholar; Wyman, DP: Europe's displaced persons, p. 71; Eder, ‘Displaced persons/“heimatlose auslaender”’, pp. 2–11.

106 Laura Hilton, ‘The reshaping of Jewish communities and identities in Frankfurt and Zeilsheim in 1945’, in Patt and Berkowitz, eds., ‘We are here’, pp. 194–226, at pp. 195, 203; Grossmann, Jews, Germans, and Allies, pp. 164–5; Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, pp. 14–33, 191.

107 Jacobmeyer, Wolfgang, Vom Zwangsarbeiter zum Heimatlosen Auslaender: Die Displaced Persons in Westdeutschland, 1945–1951 (Göttingen, 1985), p. 49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

108 Herbert, Ulrich, Hitler's foreign workers: enforced foreign labor in Germany under the Third Reich (Cambridge, 1997), pp. 379–80Google Scholar.

109 Tasch, Hannover, p. 71.

110 Mosley, Leonard O., Report from Germany (London, 1945), pp. 78–9Google Scholar.

111 ‘Der Chef der Polizei berichtet’, Hannoversche Presse, 21 Feb. 1948, Stadtbibliothek Hannover (hereafter StBH).

112 Kommandotagesbefehl Nr 47, ‘Diebstaele in Schrebergaerten’, 19 June 1945, Polizeigeschichtliche Sammlung (hereafter PogS); ‘Ordnung und Sicherheit: von Der Leiter der Abteilung “Oeffentliche Sicherheit” der Militaerregierung’, Neuer Hannoversche Kurier, 31 Dec. 1945, StBH.

113 Confidential report concerning ‘Criminal activity in DP camps in the British zone’, from ‘G’ Section, Office of the Chief of Staff, Lubbeck, BAOR, 1, Jan. 1950, TNA, FO 1052/105.

114 ‘Employment of DPs’, item 4(b), paragraph 29, ibid.

115 Wyman, DP: Europe's displaced persons, pp. 23, 173–4.

116 Eder, ‘Displaced persons/“heimatlose auslaender”’, pp. 7, 14; Hilton, ‘The black market in history and memory’, p. 495; Wieleba, ‘Die juedischen displaced persons – DPs’, p. 533, Wyman, DP: Europe's displaced persons, p. 24, Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, pp. 14, 24–9.

117 Wyman, DP: Europe's displaced persons, pp. 23, 25.

118 First fortnightly report, July 1945, TNA, FO 1050/276.

119 Teleprint message from Field Marshal Montgomery to secretary of state, 17 Aug. 1946, TNA, FO 945/595.

120 Monthly report from military government, Sept. 1945, TNA, FO 1050/27.

121 Monthly report from military government, Nov. 45, TNA, FO 1050/27.

122 First fortnightly report, 5–8 July 1945, TNA, FO 1050/253. An attempted bomb attack by a number of Polish Jews on a British military transport in September 1947 probably dramatically enhanced the negative image of DPs in the eyes of the Allies. The Jews involved, which the German press labelled ‘terrorists’, apparently had confessed to being part of a group protesting British recalcitrance concerning the limitation of Jewish immigration to Palestine. See Hannoversche Presse, 9 Sept. 1947, 6 Dec. 1947, StBH; ‘Hannover railway case’, TNA, FO 371/64905.

123 See the Public Safety Zonal Executive Offices, CCG Buende, 62 Hq CCG (BE) BAOR 1 concerning black market activates throughout the post-war period ending 31 May 1948, TNA, FO 1050/617 (quote). In addition, see the letter concerning ‘parliamentary questions – burglaries in the Hannover district of Germany’, deputy regional commissioner, HQ Land Niedersachsen 229 HQ CCG (BE) Hanover BAOR 5 to Central Secretariat, HQ CCG (BE), Berlin, 4 Apr. 1949, PRO, FO 1052/106; letter concerning ‘Burglaries in the Hannover district’, senior control officer, PW/DP Branch, HQ Land Niedersachsen, Hanover, 229 HQ CCG (BE), BAOR 5 to HQ PW/DP division, zonal executive officers; 66 HQ CCG (BE), LEMGO, BAOR 15, 13 Apr. 1949, TNA, FO 1052/106; confidential dispatch from K. G. McLean (for the military governor and commander-in-chief) to Ernest Bevin, Foreign Office, London, 4 July 1949, TNA, FO 1052/105, p. 1; FO 1050/276; first fortnightly report, July 1945, TNA, FO 1050/276.

124 The KZ-Ausschuss (Committee for Former Concentration Camp Inmates) was one of the principal private organizations in Hanover that formed within the first month of occupation in order to assist concentration camp survivors.

125 ‘Protest gegen ein Plakat’, Hannoversche Presse, 11 Mar. 1947, StBH.

126 Grabe, Thomas, Reimar Hollmann, and Klaus Mlynek, Wege aus dem chaos: Hannover 1945–1949 (Hamburg, 1985), p. 91Google Scholar.

127 ‘Der Chef der Polizei berichtet’, Hannoversche Presse, 21 Feb. 1948, StBH.

128 Jacobmeyer, Vom zwangsarbeiter, pp. 210–15. See also Herbert, Hitler's foreign workers, p. 379.

129 Echternkamp, Joerg, Nach dem krieg: alltagsnot, neuorientierung und die last der vergangenheit (Zurich, 2003), pp. 21–5Google Scholar.

130 Brief on displaced persons and refugees in British zone of Germany for a parliamentary debate on Germany on 5 Feb. 1947, TNA, FO 945/701; Grabe, Hollmann, and Mlynek, Wege aus dem Chaos, p. 106.

131 ‘Truemmerraeumung haelt Dornroeschenschlaff’, Hannoversche Presse, 12 Mar. 1948, StBH.

132 Hilton, ‘The black market in history and memory’, pp. 488–9.

133 The DP police comprised part of a wider judicial system of informal, internal courts for displaced persons camps, which would often operate with the tacit approval of the Allies. It worked to protect the camp from unwanted intruders, as well as maintain law and order, by insuring that inmates did not engage in illegal activities within the camp and surrounding environs. See Wieleba, ‘Die juedischen displaced persons – DPs’, p. 522; Koenigseder and Wetzel, Waiting for hope, pp. 134–41, 199–201.

134 Hans Hasche to League of Garden Plot Owners of Lower Saxony, 2 July 1945, StAH, HR #2, #227.

135 Caiger-Smith, Martin, ed., The face of the enemy: British photographers in Germany, 1944–1952 (Berlin, 1986), p. 11Google Scholar.

136 For a discussion of how the press forged such ethical language in the First World War, see Winter, Jay and Robert, Jean-Louis, Capital cities at war: Paris, London, Berlin, 1914–1919 (Cambridge, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, ch. 4.

137 Cattell, Maria G. and Climo, Jacob J., ‘Introduction: meaning in social memory and history: anthropological perspectives’, in Cattell, and Climo, , eds., Social memory and history: anthropological perspectives (Walnut Creek, CA, 2002), p. 20Google Scholar.

138 Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, p. 303.

139 Bade, Klaus J., ‘From emigration to immigration: the German experience in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries’, in Bade, Klaus J. and Weiner, Myron, eds., Migration past, migration future: Germany and the United States (Providence, RI, 1997), pp. 137Google Scholar.

140 Nirenberg, David, Communities of violence: persecution of minorities in the middle ages (Princeton, NJ, 1996), p. 7Google Scholar.

141 Hilton, ‘The black market in history and memory’, pp. 485–95.

142 Ibid., p. 482; Malte Zierenberg, ‘The trading city: black markets in Berlin during World War II’, in Funck, Marcus and Chickering, Roger, eds., Endangered cities: military power and urban societies in the era of the World Wars (Boston, MA, 2004), pp. 145–58Google Scholar; Van Hook, James C., Rebuilding Germany: the creation of the social market economy, 1945–1957 (Cambridge, 2007), p. 160Google Scholar; Bessel, Richard, Germany 1945: from war to peace (New York, NY, 2010), p. 336Google Scholar.

143 Bark, Dennis and Gress, David, A history of West Germany, i: from shadow to substance, 1945–1963 (Cambridge, 1989), p. 130Google Scholar.

144 Koberg, Hannover 1945, p. 30.

145 Hilton, ‘The black market in history and memory’, p. 479; Grabe, Hollmann, and Mlynek, Wege aus dem chaos, pp. 106–12.

146 Hagit Lavsky, ‘The experience of the displaced persons in Bergen-Belsen: unique or typical case?’ in Patt and Berkowitz, eds., ‘We are here’, pp. 227–56, at p. 228.

147 Kochavi, Arieh J., ‘British policy on non-repatriable displaced persons in Germany and Austria, 1945–1947’, European History Quarterly, 21 (1991), pp. 365–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 370.

148 Wyman, DP: Europe's displaced persons, p. 41.

149 Bauer, ‘“Von nuetzlichen und lästigen, erinnerten und vergessenen Fremden”’, pp. 161–2.

150 Frevert, Ute, ‘Was haben Gefühle in der Geschichte zu suchen?’, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 35 (2009), pp. 183208CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at pp. 198, 202. For a detailed discussion of the burgeoning field of the history of emotions, see Plamper, Jan, ‘The history of emotions: an interview with William Reddy, Barbara Rosenwein, and Peter Stearns’, History and Theory, 49 (2001), pp. 237–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

151 Rosenwein, Barbara, Emotional communities in the early middle ages (Ithaca, NY, 2007), p. 42Google Scholar.

152 Ibid., p. 250.

153 Gould, Deborah B., Moving politics: emotion and ACT UP's fight against AIDS (Chicago, IL, 2009), p. 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

154 Ward, Colin and Crouch, David, The allotment: its landscape and culture (Nottingham, 1997), p. 13Google Scholar.

155 Tasch, Hannover, pp. 237–8.

156 Case of Management of City Gardens, Reports of Criminal Incidents Involving Foreigners, 4 June 1945, StAH, HR #2, #199; daily log of British military command in Ruecklingen, 13 June 1945 – 15 Feb. 1946, StAH, HR #2, #199; reports from military government from 5 Sept. 1945 concerning incidents in which foreigners are involved, StAH, HR#2, #199; Lagebericht, July 1945 – Feb. 1946, StAH, HR#15, #993; Kommandotagesbefehl, Nr 64, the military government public safety, 26 July 45, PogS.

157 ‘Hannover – ein zweites Chicago’, as well as the various earlier police reports for 6 Feb. 1946, StAH, HR #2, #227.

158 ‘Wenn andere Leute schlafen’, Hannoversche Presse, 25 July 1947, StAH.

159 Polizeibericht, Jan. 1948, Niedersachsisches Hauptstaatsarchiv, Nds. #230, #2.

160 ‘Es regt sich wieder in den Laubenkolonien’, Hannoversche Presse, 4 Mar., 46, StBH. For a discussion of the vital importance of nature within man's conceptualizations of Heimat, see Neumeyer, Michael, Heimat: Zu Geschichte und Begriff eines Phänomens (Kiel, 1992), p. 74Google Scholar.

161 Harrison, Gardens, p. 31.

162 Mosse, George, The crisis of German ideology: intellectual origins of the Third Reich (New York, NY, 1964)Google Scholar; Bergmann, Klaus, Agrorromantik und Grossstadtfeindschaft (Meisenheim a. Glan, 1970), p. 30Google Scholar; Hartung, Werner, Konservative Zivilisationskritik und regionale Identität: Am Beispiel der niedersächsischen Heimatbewegung 1895 bis 1919 (Hanover, 1991), p. 51Google Scholar.

163 Lekan, Thomas M., Imagining the nation in nature: landscape preservation and German identity, 1885–1945 (Cambridge, 2004), pp. 1516Google Scholar, 67; Rollins, William H., A greener vision of home: cultural politics and environmental reform in the German heimatschutz movement, 1904–1918 (Ann Arbor, MI, 1997), pp. 526CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 159–61, 167, 174–216, 264–7; Williams, John, ‘“The chords of the German soul are tuned to nature”: the movement to preserve the natural Heimat from the Kaiserreich to the Third Reich’, Central European History, 29 (1996), pp. 339–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lekan, Thomas M. and Zeller, Thomas, eds., Germany's nature: cultural landscapes and environmental history (New Brunswick, NJ, 2005)Google Scholar; Moltke, Johannes Von, No place like home: locations of Heimat in German cinema (Berkeley, CA, 2005), pp. 618Google Scholar, 114–34, 142, 174.

164 Rollins, A greener vision of home, p. 215.

165 Ward and Crouch, The allotment, pp. 167, 187, 270; Schmitz-Emans, Moniks, ‘Gaerten und Texte – Vorueberlegungen’, in Roettgers, Kurt and Schmitz-Emans, Moniks, eds., Gaerten (Essen, 2011), pp. 720Google Scholar, at p. 8; Stein, Inseln im Häusermeer, p. 43.

166 Henderson, Susan R., ‘Roemerstadt: the modern garden city’, Planning Perspectives, 25 (2010), pp. 323–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 327.

167 Ibid.

168 Werner Nohl, ‘Die Kleingärten im Nachkriegsdeutschland: Ein ästhetisches Modell für private Gartenräume der Zukunft?’, in Lamnek, Siegfried and Tinnefeld, Marie-These, eds., Privatheit, Garten und politische Kultur: Von kommunikativen Zwischenräumen (Opladen, 2003), pp. 189213CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

169 William H. Rollins, ‘Heimat, modernity, and nation in the early heimatschutz movement’, in Hermand and Steakley, eds., Heimat, nation, and fatherland, pp. 87–112, at p. 91.

170 Stein, Inseln im Häusermeer, pp. 230–1; Ward and Crouch, The allotment, pp. 12–13, 159, 275; Roettgers and Schmitz-Emans, eds., Gaerten, pp. 43–4, 46–9, 79–80, 230–1.

171 Diary of events of daily incident log, 13 June 1945 – 15 Feb. 1946, Tagebach der britishcer Militarkommmaqndantur in Rucklingen (zu stand fuer Ruckligen, Oberricklingen, Arnun, Hemmingen, Harkenbleck, Wilkenburg, Laatzen, Wulfel, Doehren, Grasdorf, Rethen, Reden, Koldingen), 24 June 1945, StAH, HR #2, #226.

172 Tagebuch der britischen Militärkommandantur in Rücklingen, 13 June 1945 – 15 Feb. 1946), StAH, HR #2, #226. The incident cited took place on 25 July.

173 Ibid., 2 July 1945.

174 Ibid., 6 Feb. 1946.

175 Case of Paul Ziese, reports of criminal incidents involving foreigners, 6 June 45, StAH, HR #2, #199.

176 Case of Richard Bartels, 26 May 1945, StAH, HR #2, #199.

177 Case of Wilhelm Fischer, 6 June 1945, StAH, HR #2, #199.

178 Wilhelm Mueller to military government, 17 July 1945, StAH, HR #2, #227.

179 Mosse, George, Fallen soldiers: reshaping the memory of the world wars (New York, NY, and Oxford, 1990), p. 87Google Scholar.

180 Confino, Alon, Nation as local metaphor: Wurttemberg, imperial Germany, and national memory, 1881–1918 (Chapel Hill, NC, 1997), pp. 97124Google Scholar, 126, 185–9, 212–14; Applegate, A nation of provincials, pp. 1–19.

181 Applegate, A nation of provincials, p. 10.

182 Frei, 1945 und wir, p. 303.

183 Gregor, Haunted city, pp. 1–22; Seipp, Adam R., ‘Refugee town: Germans, Americans, and the uprooted in rural West Germany, 1945–1952’, Journal of Contemporary History, 44 (2009), pp. 675–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

184 Chin, Fehrenbach, Eley, and Grossmann, eds., After the Nazi racial state, pp. 22–3.

185 Ibid., pp. 6–7, 15, 29.

186 Ibid., p. 19.

187 Barnouw, Dagmar, Germany 1945: views of war and violence (Bloomington, IN, 2008), pp. xiiivCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

188 Harrison, Gardens, p. 43.

189 Kauders, Anthony, ‘History as censure: “repression” and “philo-semitism” in post-war Germany, History and Memory, 15 (2003), pp. 97122Google Scholar, at pp. 6, 103, 105; Feinstein, Holocaust survivors, p. 12.