Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T05:37:08.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND TOWN-CENTRE REDEVELOPMENT IN BRITAIN, 1959–1966*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

OTTO SAUMAREZ SMITH*
Affiliation:
Lincoln College, Oxford
*
Lincoln College, Oxford, ox1 3drotto.saumarezsmith@history.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

This article looks at central government's role, focusing on the parliamentary terms 1959–64 and 1964–6, in directing the way in which local authorities enacted the central area redevelopment schemes of the 1960s. The first two sections review the substantial but little-studied literature produced across the political spectrum about central area urban renewal in the period 1959–64. Section III uses the Joint Urban Planning Group, a group set up within the Ministry of Housing and Local Government, as a case-study to show how modernist approaches to redevelopment became operative within a government department. The Joint Urban Planning Group has received no attention from historians. Section IV discusses the fate of these ideas during Labour's first term after the 1964 election.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

My thanks to Phil Withington and the anonymous reviewers for the Historical Journal for their comments and suggestions. I would like to thank Peter Mandler for steering me towards the subject, and for his advice at many stages during the writing process. I am very grateful for feedback on written drafts from Nick Bullock, Peter Hennessey, Simon Gunn, Alan Powers, John Davis, Alistair Fair, Lucian Robinson, Richard Butler, and Peter Ruback. Also warm thanks are due to the organizers and attendees of the Transformation of Urban Britain since 1945 conference at the Centre for Urban History, University of Leicester, where I benefited from giving a section of this article. This project was completed during research for my Ph.D. at St John's College, Cambridge, funded by the Kemp Scholarship.

References

1 Sampson, Anthony, The anatomy of Britain (London, 1962), p. 299Google Scholar.

2 Whitehall: a plan for the national and government centre (London, 1965)Google Scholar; Rice, Ian, ‘“Ziggurats for bureaucrats”: Sir Leslie Martin's Whitehall scheme’, Architectural Research Quarterly, 8 (2004), pp. 313–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 For a comparable example of the symbolic role of architecture in the early 1960s in an institutional setting, see Whyte, William, ‘The modernist moment at the University of Leeds, 1957–1977’, Historical Journal, 51 (2008), pp. 169–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 See Hennessy, Peter, Whitehall (London, 1989), pp. 171–98Google Scholar.

5 Powers, Alan, Britain: modern architectures in history (London, 2007), p. 127Google Scholar.

6 Sharr, Adam and Thornton, Stephen, Demolishing Whitehall: Harold Wilson, Leslie Martin and the architecture of white heat (Farnham, 2013), pp. 3563Google Scholar, gives a vivid description of the plan's conception, but nevertheless sees the plan primarily through the prism of Wilsonite ‘white heat’ rather than Macmillanite modernization.

7 Housing policy is an exception. Dunleavy, Patrick, The politics of mass housing in Britain, 1945–1975 (Oxford, 1981), pp. 104–81Google Scholar.

8 A striking example is Hatherley, Owen, Militant modernism (London, 2009)Google Scholar. For an example from the opposite end of the spectrum, see Scruton, Roger, ‘The architecture of Stalinism’, Cambridge Review, 99 (30 Jan. 1976), pp. 3671Google Scholar.

9 Most famously in Watkin, David, Morality and architecture: the development of a theme in architectural history and theory from the Gothic revival to the modern movement (London, 1977)Google Scholar.

10 Jerram, Leif, Streetlife: the untold history of Europe's twentieth century (Oxford, 2011), p. 273Google Scholar.

11 Allan, John, Lubetkin: architecture and the tradition of progress (London, 1992)Google Scholar; Warburton, Nigel, Ernö Goldfinger: the life of an architect (London, 2003)Google Scholar; Glendinning, Miles, Modern architect: the life and times of Robert Matthew (London, 2008)Google Scholar.

12 Saint, Andrew, Towards a social architecture: the role of school-building in post-war England (London and New Haven, CT, 1987)Google Scholar.

13 Forty, Adrian, ‘Being or nothingness: private experience and public architecture in post-war Britain’, Architectural History, 38 (1995), pp. 2535CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Mandler, Peter, ‘New towns for old’, in Conekin, Becky, ed., Moments of modernity: reconstructing Britain, 1945–1964 (London, 1999), pp. 208–27Google Scholar.

15 Gold, John R., The practice of modernism: modern architects and urban transformations, 1954–1972 (London, 2007), pp. 77145Google Scholar; Pendlebury, John, ‘Alas Smith and Burns? Conservation in Newcastle upon Tyne city centre 1959–1968’, Planning Perspectives, 16 (2001), pp. 115–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 See Gunn, Simon, ‘The rise and fall of British urban modernism: planning Bradford 1945–1970’, Journal of British Studies, 48 (2010), pp. 849–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shapely, Peter, ‘Civic pride and redevelopment in the post-war British city’, Urban History, 39 (2012), pp. 310–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar. An earlier account of local government's role can be found in Stephen Elkin, L., Politics and land use planning, the London experience (Cambridge, 1974), pp. 1327Google Scholar.

17 Dunleavy, The politics of mass housing; Glendinning, Miles and Muthesius, Stefan, Tower block (New Haven, CT, and London, 1994)Google Scholar.

18 Yelling, Jim, ‘The development of residential urban renewal policies in England: planning for modernization in the 1960s’, Planning Perspectives, 14 (1999), pp. 118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

19 Ortolano, Guy, ‘Planning the urban future in 1960s Britain’, Historical Journal, 54 (2011), pp. 477507CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 The reports mentioned were Knight, Timothy et al. , Let our cities live (London, 1960)Google Scholar; Signposts for the sixties: a statement of Labour party home policy submitted by the National Executive Committee to the 60th annual conference 2–6 October 1961 (London, 1961)Google Scholar; Hall, Peter, MacEwan, Malcolm, and Willmott, Peter, The face of Britain: a policy for town and country planning (London, 1961)Google Scholar; McCulloch, F. J., Land use in an urban environment (Liverpool, 1961)Google Scholar; Change and challenge (London, 1961)Google Scholar; Town and Country Planning Association, The paper metropolis (London, 1962)Google Scholar; the then unpublished Urban redevelopment: report of a committee appointed by the Civic Trust (London, 1962)Google Scholar.

21 Mr W. F. Deedes, HC Debate, 13 Apr.1962, vol. 657, 1652.

22 Urban redevelopment.

23 Fraser, Murray and Kerr, Joe, Architecture and the special relationship: the American influence on post-war British architecture (London, 2007)Google Scholar.

24 Tripp, Alker, Town planning and road traffic (London, 1942)Google Scholar.

25 See Brett, Lionel, Renewing the cities’, Times, 3 July 1963; Peter Hall, London 2000 (London, 1963), p. 164Google Scholar.

26 See Weiler, Peter, ‘The rise and fall of the Conservatives’ “grand design for housing”, 1951–1964Contemporary British History, 14 (2000), pp. 122–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Thorpe, D. R., Supermac: the life of Harold Macmillan (London, 2011), p. 285Google Scholar.

28 Catterall, Peter, ed., The Macmillan diaries (London, 2003)Google Scholar, 12 Dec. 1953.

29 Butler, D. E. and King, Anthony, The British general election of 1964 (London, 1965), p. 88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Ramsden, John, The winds of change: Macmillan to Heath, 1957–1975 (London, 1996), p. 143Google Scholar.

31 Quoted in Halcrow, Morrison, Keith Joseph: a single mind (London, 1989), p. 31Google Scholar.

32 Thorpe, Supermac, p. 83; Thorpe, D. R., Alec Douglas-Home (London, 1996), pp. 81–2Google Scholar; Thorpe, D. R., Eden: the life and times of Anthony Eden, first earl of Avon 1987–1977 (London, 2003)Google Scholar.

33 Marriott, Oliver, The property boom (Abingdon, 1989)Google Scholar.

34 See Tomlinson, John, ‘Conservative modernization, 1960–1964: too little too late?’, Contemporary British History, 11 (1997), pp. 1838CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Buchanan, Colin, Traffic in towns (London, 1963)Google Scholar. See Gunn, Simon, ‘The Buchanan Report: environment and the problem of traffic in 1960s Britain’, Twentieth Century British History, 22 (2011), pp. 521–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

36 Buchanan, Traffic in towns, p. 17.

37 Homes for today and tomorrow (London, 1961)Google Scholar.

38 Thorpe, Supermac, p. 501.

39 Ibid., pp. 501–6.

40 Prosperity with a purpose: the Conservative 1964 manifesto (London, 1964)Google Scholar.

41 The Bow Group is a Conservative think tank, set up in 1951 for Conservatives under the age of thirty-five. For their influence in this period, see Bale, Tim, The Conservatives since 1945: the drivers of party change (London, 2012), p. 99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 www.scottisharchitects.org.uk/architect_full.php?id=400463, last accessed 30 Sept. 2013; Meyerson, Martin, Tyrwhitt, Jaqueline, Falk, Brian, and Sekler, Patricia, Face of the metropolis (New York, NY, 1963)Google Scholar.

43 Sharp, Thomas, Town and countryside (London, 1932)Google Scholar; Sharp, Thomas, Town planning (London, 1940)Google Scholar.

44 See for example de Wolf, Ivor, ‘Italian townscape’, Architectural Review, 131 (1962), p. 383Google Scholar.

45 The planning of a new town (London, 1961), pp. 1617Google Scholar and 41; Graeme Shankland, ‘Lessons of the new towns’, Times, 3 July 1961.

46 Wilson, Hugh, New towns: what next?’, Twentieth Century (autumn, 1962), pp. 98106Google Scholar.

47 See Gold, John, ‘A SPUR to action: the Society for the Promotion of Urban Renewal, “anti-scatter” and the crisis of reconstruction’, Planning Perspectives, 27 (2012), pp. 199223CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Knight et al., Let our cities live, p. 1.

49 Ibid., p. 8.

50 Ibid., pp. 11–12.

51 Ibid., p. 10.

52 Ibid., p. 10.

53 Ibid., p. 40.

54 Ibid., p. 8.

55 Ibid., p. 39.

56 Trust, Civic, Rebuilding cities: report of conference held at Middlesex Guildhall Friday 15th July 1960 (London, 1960)Google Scholar.

57 Urban redevelopment.

58 Including Lionel Brett, Colin Buchanan, Hugh Cadbury Brown, Peter Chamberlin, A. W. Cleeve Bar, Jane Drew, Maxwell Fry, Frederick Gibberd, George Grenfell Baines, Sir William Holford, Leslie Lane, Graeme Shankland, Richard Sheppard, and Stanley Wardley.

59 Ibid., p. 13.

60 Ibid., p. 5.

61 Change and challenge: next steps in town and country planning (London, 1962), p. 1Google Scholar.

62 Ibid., p. 7.

63 Ibid., p. 14.

64 Ibid., p. 17.

65 Ibid., p. 34.

66 Urban Central Redevelopment, HC Deb., 13 Apr. 1962, vol. 657, cc. 645–74.

67 Committee on London roads report (London, 1959), p. 11Google Scholar.

68 Loft, Charles, Government, the railways and the modernization of Britain: Beeching's last train (London, 2006), p. 55Google Scholar.

69 Times, 27 Nov. 1959, p. 8.

70 D. J. Dutton, ‘Marples, (Alfred) Ernest, Baron Marples (1907–1978)’, Oxford dictionary of national biography (ODNB).

71 ‘The Tory menu: jam tomorrow’, Guardian, 14 Oct. 1964, p. 10.

72 Quoted in Brian Harrison, ‘Joseph, Keith Sinjohn, Baron Joseph (1918–1994)’,ODNB.

73 Sir Keith Joseph, HC Deb., 10 Dec. 1962, vol. 669, c. 68. See also Keith Joseph's speech on ‘Planning for growth’ to the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors reprinted in Chartered Surveyor, 96 (1963) p. 16Google Scholar.

74 People and cities: report of the 1963 London conference, organized by the British Road Federation in association with the Town Planning Institute (London, 1963), p. 12Google Scholar.

75 Editor of the Economist until 1956, had been appointed chairman of the steering group to deal with traffic in towns.

76 People and cities, pp. 25–6.

77 Property developers had a significant role in the Profumo affair. Davenport-Hines, Richard, An English affair (London, 2013), pp. 149–86Google Scholar.

78 Ibid., p. 98.

79 See for example Shankland, Graeme, ‘Dead centre: the crisis of planning and the future of cities – 2’, Architectural Association Journal (Mar. 1957), pp. 190203Google Scholar.

80 Ibid., p. 105. Another vivid insight into property developers of the period can be found in Gale, John, ‘Jack Cotton explains’, Twentieth Century, 172 (1962), pp. 7782Google Scholar.

81 Ibid., p. 245.

82 Gold, The practice of modernism, p. 125.

83 Rowe, Colin, ‘The Blenheim of the welfare state’ (1959), in As I was saying: Texas, pre-Texas, Cambridge (Boston, MA, 1996), p. 144Google Scholar. Disraeli's original quotation has a different import.

84 Black, Lawrence, The political culture of the left in affluent Britain (London, 2003)Google Scholar.

85 Jenkins, Roy, The Labour case (London, 1959), p. 145Google Scholar.

86 Crosland, Anthony, The Conservative enemy: a programme of radical reform for the 1960s (London, 1962), p. 183Google Scholar. Whether such a suburban pastiche as a ‘green-tiled Tudor bungalow’ had been built in the interwar period let alone since the war is surely a moot point.

87 Ibid., p. 195.

88 Ibid., p. 191.

89 Nairn, Ian, Outrage (London, 1956)Google Scholar.

90 Crosland, Anthony, The future of socialism (London, 1956), p. 526Google Scholar.

91 Ibid., p. 526

92 Chamberlin Powell and Bon's Barbican would of course be built; construction started in 1965. Kadleigh's scheme for 8,000 people housed in towers rising out of a podium spanning Paddington goods yard remained on the drawing board. See Kadleigh, Sergei, High Paddington: a town for 8000 people (London, 1952)Google Scholar.

93 Leisure for living (London, 1959), p. 16Google Scholar.

94 Ibid., pp. 16–18.

95 Ibid., p. 19.

96 Gaitskell, Hugh, ‘Paying for the future’, Twentieth Century, 172 (1962), pp. 33–8Google Scholar.

97 ‘A new Britain’: Labour party manifesto 1964 (London, 1964)Google Scholar.

98 Ibid. See also Peter Jenkins, ‘Mr Wilson's points for a new Britain’, Guardian, 10 Feb. 1964.

99 ‘A new Britain’.

100 Jenkins, The Labour case, p. 55.

101 Wedgwood Benn, Anthony, ‘The motor god’ (15 May 1964), in The regeneration of Britain (London, 1965), p. 133Google Scholar.

102 Loft, Government, p. 58.

103 Signposts for the sixties: towns for our times: a Labour party looking ahead pamphlet, 4 (London, 1961)Google Scholar.

104 Ibid., p. 20.

105 Cullingworth, J. B., Restraining urban growth: the problem of overspill (London, 1960)Google Scholar; Greve, John, The housing problem (London, 1961)Google Scholar; Cullingworth, J. B., New towns for old: the problem of urban renewal (London, 1962)Google Scholar; Harry Brack Building for a new society (London, 1964)Google Scholar.

106 Hall, MacEwan, and Willmott, The face of Britain.

107 Hall, London 2000.

108 See MacEwan, Malcolm, The greening of a red (London, 1991), pp. 203–16Google Scholar.

109 Booker, Christopher, The neophiliacs (London, 1969)Google Scholar, esp. p. 149.

110 Samuel, Raphael, Theatres of memory (London, 1994), p. 51Google Scholar.

111 Times, 28 Nov. 1963, p. 12.

112 ‘The Urban planning group of the Ministry of Housing and Local Government’, Official Architecture and Planning (June 1963), pp. 541–2.

113 See Littler, F. H., ‘Changing towns – planning for renewal’, Town Planning Institute Journal, 48 (1962), pp. 199206Google Scholar; Frank Hudson Littler, ‘The city of Exeter, Devon, a planning study’ (Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, 1937).

114 ‘“What is the urban planning group?”, 5 Dec. 1962, extension of joint urban planning group and inclusion of Ministry of Transport’, The National Archives (TNA), HLG 136/167.

115 See John Delafons, ‘Reforming the British planning system 1964–1965: the Planning Advisory Group and the genesis of the Planning Act of 1967’, Planning Perspectives (Oct. 1998), pp. 373–87, and Davies, H. W. E., ‘The planning system and the development plan’, in Cullingworth, Barry, ed., British planning: 50 years of urban, and regional policy (London, 1999), pp. 50–4Google Scholar.

116 TNA, A. Sylvester-Evans, 4 Apr. 1961, HLG 136/8.

117 ‘The urban planning group of the MHLG’, Official architecture and planning (June 1963), pp. 541–2. There is a picture of the exhibition on p. 541, looking rather like the Thunderbirds control room.

118 TNA, ‘What is the urban planning group?’, HLG 136/167.

119 TNA, J. Delafons, 11 Dec. 1961, ‘Central area redevelopment schemes’, HLG 136/9.

120 TNA, minutes of meeting, 27 Nov. 1961, HLG 136/8.

121 TNA, minutes of meeting, 7 Mar. 1962, ‘Central area redevelopment schemes’, HLG 136/8.

122 Ibid.

123 TNA, letter signed F. H. Littler, 21 Mar. 1962, ‘Inner ring road redevelopment proposals’, HLG79/1288.

124 TNA, ‘Urban planning bulletins’ (undated, but 1961), HLG 136/24.

125 [Ministry of Housing and Local Government], Planning bulletin no. 1, Town centres: approach to renewal (London, 1962), p. 2Google Scholar.

126 TNA, N. Litchfield to A. Sylvester Evans, 20 Mar. 1961, HLG 136/24.

127 TNA, A. Sylvester Evans to Mr Street, 17 Mar. 1961, HLG 136/24.

128 Bulletin no. 1, p. 3.

129 Ibid., p. 2.

130 Bulletin no. 1, p. 1. See Ward, Stephen V., Public private partnerships’, British planning, 50 years of urban and regional policy (London, 1999), pp. 237–8Google Scholar.

131 Delafons, John, Politics and preservation: a policy history of the built heritage, 1882–1996 (London, 1997), p. 87Google Scholar.

132 Ibid., map.

133 Ibid., p. 6.

134 Ibid., p. 6.

135 [Ministry of Housing and Local Government, and Ministry of Transport], Planning bulletin no. 4, Town centres: current practices (London, 1963)Google Scholar.

136 For the scheme, see Smith, Otto Saumarez, ‘Graeme Shankland: a sixties architect-planner and the political culture of the British left’, Architectural History, 54 (2014), pp. 393422CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at p. 406.

137 Planning bulletin no. 4, Current practices.

138 Hall, London 2000, p. 167n.

139 Kenneth J. Robinson, ‘Sick transit…’, Spectator, 10 Aug. 1962, p. 12.

140 Carline, T. H., ‘Folkestone: planning proposals for the town centre of a seaside resort’, Town Planning Review, 36 (1966), p. 259CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

141 Amos, Francis J. C., ‘Liverpool’, in Holliday, John, ed., City centre redevelopment (London, 1973), p. 203Google Scholar.

142 Confusingly, this co-operation was welcomed prematurely in Editorial notes’, Town Planning Review, 33 (1962), p. 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and ‘Save town centres: adapting to the car age’, Guardian, 25 July 1962, p. 4. The first bulletin did have a foreword by Hill and Marples, but was the work of MHLG alone. The co-operation prefigures the merging of the two departments as the department for the Environment, and reflects current thinking on the need for integrating land use and traffic planning.

143 TNA, Dame Evelyn Sharp to Sir Thomas Padmore, 26 July 1963, MT 45/655.

144 TNA, Evelyn Sharp and Thomas Padmore, circular no. 1/64, 17 Jan. 1964, HLG 136/99.

145 TNA, Evelyn Sharp to Mr James, 20 May 1963, HLG 136/167.

146 Alan Bennett, ‘Views’, Listener, 30 Nov. 1967, p. 692.

147 ‘Mr. Crossman on his housing policy’, Times, 29 Oct. 1964, p. 16.

148 TNA, ‘Planning advisory group, papers circulated’, HLG136/142.

149 Atticus, Sunday Times, 14 Feb. 1965, p. 9.

150 Crossman, Richard, The diaries of a cabinet minister, i: Minister of housing, 1964–1966 (London, 1974), p. 30Google Scholar.

151 Cadman, David, ‘Property finance in the UK in the post-war period’, Land Development Studies, 1.2 (1984), pp. 68–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

152 Crossman, Diaries, p. 177.

153 Delafons, ‘Reforming the British planning system 1964–1965’, p. 379.

154 Buchanan, Traffic in towns, p. 43.

155 Burns, Wilfred, Newcastle-upon-Tyne development plan review (Newcastle, 1963), p. 23Google Scholar.

156 Liverpool city centre plan (Liverpool, 1965), p. 30Google Scholar.

157 TNA, Crossman speech to Town Planning Institute, HLG136/142.

158 The national plan (London, 1965)Google Scholar.

159 TNA, ‘Circular 8/65’, MT 47/553.

160 Colin Buchanan and Partners, Cardiff development and transportation study: probe study report (Apr. 1966).

161 Castle, Barbara, Diaries, 1964–1970 (London, 1990), p. 108Google Scholar.

162 TNA, sixth meeting, JUPG Environment Study Group, 28 Sept. 1964, HLG 136/168.

163 The Deeplish study: improvement possibilities in a district of Rochdale (London, 1966)Google Scholar.

164 Crossman, Diaries, p. 340.

165 TNA, ‘Outline programme July–October 1964’, HLG 136/211.

166 TNA, HLG 136/210. See also Moran, JoeCrossing the road in Britain, 1931–1976’, Historical Journal, 49 (2006), pp. 477–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for the history of the less radical approaches to traffic management post-Buchanan.

167 Smigielski, Konrad, Leicester traffic plan (Leicester, 1964)Google Scholar.

168 TNA, ‘Leicester traffic survey’, HLG 136/200.

169 Ibid.

170 Ibid.

171 TNA, ‘Land use and transportation planning: the role of public transport, the case for an examination’, HLG 136/200.

172 Ibid.

173 Frith, D. W., Haringey Archives, Wood Green central area (London, Apr. 1967)Google Scholar, 925.2 (box 1), p. 3.

174 History of the scheme’, in Haringey central area (London, 1979)Google Scholar. See also Home, Robert K., Wood Green shopping city (London, 1984)Google Scholar.

175 ‘Time for decision’ 1966 Labour party manifesto.

176 Ibid.

177 For example, Klemek, Christopher, The transatlantic collapse of urban renewal, postwar urbanism from New York to Berlin (Chicago, IL, 2011), pp. 161–7Google Scholar, and Powers, Britain, pp. 125–63. See also Gunn, ‘The rise and fall of British modernism’, pp. 868–9.

178 A previous account of the importance of public–private partnerships in the period is Shapley, Peter, ‘Governance in the post-war city: historical reflections on public–private partnership in the UK’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (article published online 11 Feb. 2012)Google Scholar.

179 See O'Hara, Glen, From dreams to disillusionment: economic and social planning in 1960s Britain (London, 2006), pp. 206–8Google Scholar.