Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:37:45.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Islamic Astronomy in China: Two New Sources for the Huihui Li (“Islamic Calendar”)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Benno Van Dalen
Affiliation:
International Institute for Linguistic Sciences, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kamigamo, Kita-ku, 603 Kyoto, Japan*
Michio Yano
Affiliation:
International Institute for Linguistic Sciences, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kamigamo, Kita-ku, 603 Kyoto, Japan*

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this talk we will discuss some aspects of the exchange of astronomical knowledge that took place between the Muslim world and China in the thirteenth and fourteenth century. In that period both the eastern part of the Muslim world, consisting of Persia and surrounding countries, and China, ruled by the Yuan Dynasty, were part of the Mongol world empire. In particular in the period between 1260 and 1280, astronomers as well as astronomical books and instruments were exchanged between Persia and China. As a result, extensive descriptions of a Chinese luni-solar calendar can be found in Arabic and Persian astronomical works from the Mongol period, whereas a Chinese text entitled Huihui Li (“Islamic Calendar”) can be seen to be a translation of a typical Islamic astronomical handbook with tables and explanatory text, in Arabic and Persian called zīj. Islamic astronomy had a good name in China because of its accurate prediction of eclipses, and the Huihui li was used parallel with the official Chinese calendar for almost 300 years.

Type
II. Joint Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1998

References

Benno van Dalen, E.S. Kennedy, , and Mustafa, K. Saiyid, , “The Chinese-Uighur Calendar in Tūsī’s Zīj-i Īlkhānī”, Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamìschen Wissenschaften 11 (1997), pp. 111152.Google Scholar
Franke, Herbert, “Mittelmongolische Glossen in einer arabischen astronomischen Handschrift von 1366”, Oriens 31 (1988), pp. 95118.Google Scholar
Haxtner, Willy, “The Astronomical Instruments of Cha-ma-lu-ting, their Identification, and their Relations to the Instruments of the Observatory of Marāgha”, Isis 41 (1950), pp. 184195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Edward S., “Eclipse Predictions in Arabic Astronomical Tables Prepared for the Mongol Viceroy of Tibet”, Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenschaften 4 (1987/88), pp. 6080.Google Scholar
Jiujin, CHEN, “Comparative Research Between the Huihuì Calendar, Chiljŏng Oepiŏn and Qizheng tuibu”, in: Oriental Astronomy from Guo Shoujing to King Sejong, Proceedings of an International Conference (Seoul, Korea, 6-11 October 1993), Seoul 1997, pp. 105111.Google Scholar
Meidong, CHEN, “A Study of Some Astronomical Data in Muslim Calendar”, in: History of Oriental Astronomy: Proceedings of an International Astronomical Union Colloquium No. 91 (New Delhi, India, 13-16 November 1985), Cambridge 1987, pp. 169174.Google Scholar
Yabuuti, Kiyosi, Chūgoku no tenmon-rekihō (Chinese Astronomy and Calendrical Sciences), Tokyo 1969.Google Scholar
Yabuuti, Kiyosi, translated and partially revised by Dalen, Benno van, “Islamic Astronomy in China during the Yuan and Ming Dynasties”, Historia Scientiarum 7 (1997), pp. 1143.Google Scholar
Yano, Michio, Labbān’s, Kūšyār IbnIntroduction to Astrology’ (edition and translation), Tokyo 1997.Google Scholar