Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T04:56:53.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Man Who Mistook his Handlung for a Tat: Hegel on Oedipus and Other Tragic Thebans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

Constantine Sandis
Constantine Sandis*
Affiliation:
Oxford Brookes University, csandis@brookes.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Throughout his work Hegel distinguishes between the notion of an act (Tun) from the standpoint of the agent (behaviour in so far as it relates to one's own foreknowledge, purpose, intention, and knowledge) and that of all other standpoints (e.g. legal, scientific, cultural, etc.). He terms the former Handlung (action) and the latter Tat (deed). This distinction should not be confused with the contemporary one between action and mere bodily movement. For one, both Handlung and Tat are aspects of conduct that results from the will, viz. Tun (LA 1160ff.). Moreover, Hegel's taxonomy is motivated purely by concerns relating to modes of perception. So whereas theorists such as Donald Davidson assert that all actions are events that are intentional under some description, Hegel reserves the term ‘action’ for those aspects of behaviour that are highlighted by a specific (albeit contested) set of agent-related descriptions. This is not an ontological category, since there are no such objects as actions-under-specific-descriptions (see Anscombe 1979).

Sophocles's Theban Trilogy reveals the central role that these notions must play in any Hegelian understanding of tragic drama. Indeed the contrasts that matter most to Hegel's general take on both epic and tragic poetry are more closely related to the study of action than the standard theory attributed to Hegel would seem to allow. It is more fruitful, then, to incorporate Hegel's insights into such tragedies to the model of action employed by him than it is to try to make them fit whatever ‘theory’ of tragedy might appear to be hinted at in his Aesthetics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 31 , Special Issue 2: Special Issue on Hegel and Literature , Autumn/Winter 2010 , pp. 35 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957), Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1979), ‘“Under a Description”’ in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind: Collected Philosophical Papers Volume II. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , (1940), Poetics. trans. Bywater, I.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowra, M. (1944), Sophoclean Tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, A. C. (1950), Oxford Lectures on Poetry, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bushnell, R., ed. (2005), A Companion to Tragedy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bushnell, R. (2008), Tragedy: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2002), Antigone's Claim: Kinship Between Life & Death, new edition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dancy, J. (2002), ‘Prichard on Duty and Ignorance of Fact’ in Stratton-Lake, P. (ed.), Ethical Intuitionism: Re-evaluations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (2001), Essays on Actions and Events, 2nd rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Beistegui, M. (2000), ‘Hegel: Or the Tragedy of Thinking’ in de Beistegui, M. and Sparks, S. (eds), Philosophy and Tragedy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Boer, K. (2010), On Hegel: The Sway of the Negative. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, E.R. (1983), ‘On Misunderstanding the Oedipus Rex’ in Segal, E. (ed.) Oxford Readings in Greek Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Easterling, P.E. (1983), ‘Character in Sophocles’ in Segal, E. (ed.) Oxford Readings in Greek Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1900), Die Traumdeutung. Leipzig & Vienna: Franz Deuticke.Google Scholar
Gasché, R. (2000), ‘Self-Dissolving Seriousness: On the Comic in the Hegelian Conception of Tragedy’ in de Beistegui, M. and Sparks, S. (eds), Philosophy and Tragedy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heaney, S. (2004), The Burial at Thebes. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Heaney, S. (2005), ‘Search for the Soul of Antigone’, The Guardian, 2 November.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1984–1987), Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, trans. Hodgson, P. C.. 3 vols. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1988), Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, trans. Knox, T. M.. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991), Elements of the Philosophy of Right, trans. Nisbet, H.B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2003), Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Kunst (1823), ed. Gethmann-Siefert, A.. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2005), Hegel: Freedom, Truth and History, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2007), ‘Hegel's Theory of Tragedy’ in Houlgate, S. (ed.), Hegel and the Arts. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2010), ‘Action, Right and Morality in Hegel's Philosophy of Right’, in Laitinen, A. and Sandis, C. (eds), Hegel on Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jung, C. (1933), Modern Man in Search of a Soul. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. (1968), Tragedy and Philosophy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Knowles, D. (2010), ‘Hegel on Actions, Reasons, and Causes’, in Laitinen, A. and Sandis, C. (eds), Hegel on Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Knox, B. (1979), Word & Action: Essays on the Ancient Theater. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Knox, B. (1989), Essays: Ancient & Modern. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kundera, M. (2007), The Curtain: An Essay in Seven Parts, trans. Asher, L.. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Laitinen, A. and Sandis, C. (2010), ‘Hegel and Contemporary Philosophy of Action’ in Laitinen, A. and Sandis, C. (eds), Hegel on Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Laitinen, A. & Sandis, C. (forthcoming), ‘Hegel on Purpose’, unpublished.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1967), A Short History of Ethics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1981), After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1988), Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Markell, P. (2003), Bound by Recognition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (2009), ‘Towards a Reading of Hegel on Action in the “Reason” chapter of the Phenomenology’, in Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1999), The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings, eds. Guess, R. & Speirs, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001), The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, rev. edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2000), Hegel: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (2010), ‘Hegel's Social Theory of Agency: The “Inner-Outer” problem’ in Laitinen, A. and Sandis, C. (eds), Hegel on Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Paolucci, A. & Paolucci, H., eds. (1962), Hegel on Tragedy. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Poole, A. (2005), Tragedy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prichard, H. A. (2002), ‘Duty and Ignorance of Fact’ in Moral Writings, ed. MacAdam, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quante, M. (2004), Hegel's Concept of Action, trans. Moyer, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, N.S. (2008), Greek Tragedy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1925), ‘Universals’, reprinted in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. Patterson: Littlefield Adams & Co. Google Scholar
Ricœur, P. (1992), Oneself as Another, trans. Blamey, K.. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Roche, M. (2005), ‘The Greatness and Limits of Hegel's Theory of Tragedy’ in Bushnell, R. (ed.), A Companion to Tragedy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roche, M. (2006), ‘Introduction to Hegel's Theory of Tragedy’, PhaenEx 1 (2): 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. (2002), The Right and the Good, rev. ed., ed. Stratton-Lake, P.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandis, C. (2009a), ‘Gods and Mental States: The Causation of Action in Ancient Tragedy and Modern Philosophy of Mind’ in Sandis, C. (ed.), New Essays on the Explanation of Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandis, C. (2009b), ‘Hume and “Motivating Reasons”’ in Pigden, C. (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue: New Essays. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sandis, C. (forthcoming), ‘On Psychoanalysisng Ancient Tragedy’ in. O'Gorman, E.C. & Zajko, V. (eds), Classical Myth and Psychoanalysis: Stories of the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (2001), Oedipus Tyrannus: Tragic Heroism and the Limits of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheppard, J. T. (1911), Greek Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silk, M.S. and Stern, J.P. (1983), Nietzsche on Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sophocles, (1982), The Three Theban Plays, trans Fagles, R.. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Speight, A. (2001), Hegel, Literature and the Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, G. (1984), Antigones. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1979). ‘Action as Expression’, in Diamond, C. & Teichman, J. (eds), Intention and Intentionality. Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1983). ‘Hegel and the Philosophy of Action’, in Stepelevitch, L.S. & Lamb, D. (eds), Hegel's Philosophy of Action. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1983), ‘Ambiguity and Reversal: On the Enigmatic Structure of Oedipus Rex’ in Segal, E. (ed.) Oxford Readings in Greek Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1988), ‘Oedipus Without the Complex’ in Vernant, J.-P. and Vidal-Naquet, P., Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, trans. Lloyd, J.. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Vernant, J-P. & Vidal-Naquet, P. (1988), Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, trns. Lloyd, J.. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. (2007), The Cambridge Introduction to Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. (1994), ‘Community as the Basis for Free Individual Action’, in Daly, M. (ed.), Communitarianism. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. (2003), Hegel's Epistemology. Cambridge MA.: Hackett.Google Scholar
White, N. (2002), Individual and Conflict in Greek Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. (1993), Shame and Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Wright, G.H. (1986), ‘Truth, Negation, and Contradiction’, Synthese:66:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A.W. (1990), Hegel's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A.W. (2010), ‘Hegel on Responsibility for Actions and Consequences’, in Laitinen, A. and Sandis, C. (eds), Hegel on Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar