Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:38:15.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hegel and Lukács on the Novel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

Allen Speight*
Affiliation:
Boston University, casp8@bu.edu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

That Hegel was a significant influence on the young Georg Lukács' Theory of the Novel is a point few would dispute. Lukács himself insisted that the first part of TN represented his own transition from Kantian to Hegelian theory, and most critics have subsequently affirmed the importance of Hegel to Lukács' pre- (or, depending on one's view, proto-) Marxist argument in TN. Yet the two are in some ways strange to take together in the context of novelistic theory. Despite the profusion of novelistic literature in his own time and his own significant appropriation of it for the limning of essential moments of the development of the world-historical spirit, Hegel's official Aesthetics hardly presents what one could claim to be an especially worked-out theory of the novel. The Aesthetics takes up literature in general primarily under the rubric of providing a theory of the genres of poetry — epic, lyric and dramatic — and what relatively few words Hegel actually devotes to the novel and prose literature in the lectures are tucked in corners: at the end of the discussion of the development of the epic, in the discussion of the historical form of the romantic, and in scattered comments elsewhere. As for TN, despite the strong connections some have drawn between Hegel and Lukács — Peter Demetz said that Lukács was ‘in a certain sense … the last Hegelian in the grand style’ (Demetz 1967: 215) — others have questioned whether Lukács' work should be regarded primarily as making a contribution to the philosophy of literature in the tradition from which Hegel writes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2010

References

Bernstein, J. M. (1984), The Philosophy of the Novel: Lukács, Marxism and the Dialectics of Form. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
De Man, P. (1971), ‘George Lukács' Theory of the Novel’, in Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Demetz, P. (1967), Marx, Engels, and the Poets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970), Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik, Werke, vols xiii–xv, ed. Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K. M.. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1975), Hegel's Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, trans. Knox, T. M., 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, H. (1965), ‘Toward a Sociology of the Novel’, Journal of the History of Ideas 26: 148–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukács, G. (1963), Die Theore des Romans: ein geschichtsphilosophischer Versuch über die Formen der grossen Epik. Berlin: Hermann Luchterhand Verlag.Google Scholar
Lukács, G. (1971), Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature, trans. Bostock, Anna. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (1994), Hegel's ‘Phenomenology’: The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speight, A (2001), Hegel, Literature and the Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar