Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T07:06:02.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paul and the Jesus Tradition: It Is Time for Another Look

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

Stephen J. Patterson
Stephen J. Patterson
Affiliation:
Eden Theological Seminary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the most vexing problems in the history of New Testament scholarship has been the relationship between Jesus and Paul. The problem is this: although Paul became one of the most prolific representatives of the movement that began with Jesus, by most modern accounts, he pays so little attention to the historical figure Jesus of Nazareth that, paradoxically, one has been forced to conclude that Paul really did not know much about Jesus, or perhaps even that Paul simply was not interested in the historical person Jesus. The discussion of the relationship (or lack thereof) between Paul and Jesus has a history that is both long and complex. But when one surveys the vast literature devoted to the subject one thing stands out: the major advances in the discussion have generally been achieved not by efforts to understand the apostle Paul better, but by new developments in the study of the historical Jesus and the theological program that has always attached itself to this thorny issue.

Type
Research Article
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 84 , Issue 1 , January 1991 , pp. 23 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Baur, Ferdinand Christian, Geschichte der christlichen Kirche, vol. 1: Kirchengeschichte der drei ersten Jahrhunderte (Tübingen: Fues, 1863) 308Google Scholar.

2 Baur, Ferdinand Christian, Vorlesungen über neutestamentliche Theologie (Leipzig: Fues [L. W. Reisland], 1864) 123–24;Google ScholarBaur, , Geschichte der christlichen Kirche, 1. 309Google Scholar.

3 Schweitzer, Albert, Von Reimarus zu Wrede (Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1906)Google Scholar; ET: The Quest of the Historical Jesus (London: Adam and Charles Black, 1910)Google Scholar.

4 Wrede, W., Paulus (Halle a. S.: Gebauer-Schwetschke, 1904); ET:Google ScholarPaul (trans. Lummis, E.; London: Philip Green, 1907)Google Scholar.

5 Weiss, Johannes, Der Predigt Jesu vom Reiche Gottes (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1892); ET:Google ScholarJesus' Proclamation of the Kingdom of God (trans. Miers, Richard Hyde and Holland, David Larrimore; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1971)Google Scholar.

6 Victor Paul Furnish notes this lull in his masterful survey of the discussion: “The Jesus-Paul Debate: From Baur to Bultmann,” BJRL 47 (1964/1965) 361Google Scholar.

7 That Jesus and Paul were in agreement on the subject of the apocalypse had been argued already by Kabisch, Rich., Die Eschatologie des Paulus (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1893)Google Scholar.

8 Bultmann, Rudolf, “Die Bedeutung des geschichtlichen Jesus für die Theologie des Paulus,” Theologische Blätter 8 (1929) 137–39Google Scholar; ET: “The Significance of the Historical Jesus for the Theology of Paul,” in idem, Faith and Understanding (ed. R. W. Funk; trans. Louise Pettibone Smith; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1969) 220-22.

9 See, e.g., Furnish, “Jesus-Paul Debate”; Dungan, David L., The Sayings of Jesus in the Churches of Paul: The Use of the Synoptic Tradition in the Regulation of Early Church Life (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1971) xvii–xxxiii;Google ScholarWilson, S. G., “From Jesus to Paul: The Contours and Consequences of a Debate,” in Richardson, Peter and Hurd, John C., eds., From Jesus to Paul: Studies in Honor of Francis Wright Beare (Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfred Laurier University Press, 1984) 1–21Google Scholar.

10 Borg, So Marcus J., “A Renaissance in Jesus Studies,” TToday 45 (1988) 280–92.Google Scholar For additional recent bibliography see Reumann, John, “Jesus and Christology,” in Epp, Eldon Jay and MacRae, George W., eds. The New Testament and Its Modern Interpreters (Philadelphia: Fortress; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1989) 501–64;Google ScholarNeill, Stephen and Wright, Tom, The Interpretation of the New Testament (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1988) 379–97;Google ScholarCharlesworth, James H., “From Barren Mazes to Gentle Rappings: The Emergence of Jesus Research,” Princeton Seminary Bulletin 7 (1986) 225–30Google Scholar.

11 Theissen, Gerd, Studien zur Soziologie der Urchristentums (WUNT 19; Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1979; reprinted 1983).Google Scholar The first and most important of the articles collected here is “Wanderradikalismus. Literatursoziologische Aspekte der Überlieferung von Worten Jesu im Urchristentum,” first published in ZThK 70 (1973) 245–71Google Scholar.

12 Theissen, Gerd, Soziologie der Jesusbewegung (Theologische Existenz heute 194; München: Kaiser, 1977); ET:Google ScholarSociology of Early Palestinian Christianity (trans. Bowden, John; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1978)Google Scholar.

13 Theissen, , Studien, 91Google Scholar.

14 Schottroff, Luise and Stegemann, Wolfgang, Jesus von Nazareth—Hoffnung der Armen (Urban Taschenbücher 639; Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1978); ET:Google ScholarJesus and the Hope of the Poor (trans. O'Connell, Matthew J.; Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1986).Google Scholar For their critique of Theissen, see pp. 48-49 (ET).

15 Mack, Burton L., “The Kingdom That Didn't Come: A Social History of the Q Tradents,” in Lull, David J., ed., SBL 1988 Seminar Papers 27 (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988) 620–23; see also hisGoogle ScholarA Myth of Innocence: Mark and Christian Origins (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1988) 72–74, 84-87Google Scholar.

16 Vaage, Leif, Q: The Ethos and Ethics of an Itinerant Intelligence (Ph.D. diss., Claremont Graduate School, 1987)Google Scholar; Uro, Risto, Sheep Among the Wolves: A Study of the Mission Instructions of Q (Annales Academiae Scientarium Fennicae: Dissertationes Humanarum Litterarum 47; Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, 1987); andGoogle ScholarTashjian, Jirair, The Social Setting of the Mission Charge in Q (Ph.D. diss., Claremont Graduate School, 1987)Google Scholar.

17 Kloppenberg, John S., The Formation of Q: Trajectories in Ancient Wisdom Collections (Studies in Antiquity and Christianity; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1987) 320–21Google Scholar.

18 Ibid., 242.

19 Patterson, Stephen J., “The Gospel of Thomas and the Historical Jesus: Retrospectus and Prospectus,” in Lull, David J., ed., SBL 1990 Seminar Papers 29 (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1990) 614-36 (esp. 627-36).Google Scholar

20 Meyer, Ben F., The Aims of Jesus (London: SCM, 1979)Google Scholar.

21 Sanders, E. P., Jesus and Judaism (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1985)Google Scholar.

22 Borg, Marcus J., Conflict, Holiness and Politics in the Teachings of Jesus (New York: Mellon, 1984)Google Scholar; and more recently, idem, Jesus: A New Vision (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1988)Google Scholar.

23 Horsley, Richard A., Jesus and the Spiral of Violence: Popular Jewish Resistance in Roman Palestine (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987)Google Scholar.

24 Ebertz, Michael N., Das Charisma des Gekreuzigten: Zur Soziologie der Jesusbewegung (WUNT 45; Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1987)Google Scholar; Walter Wink, “Neither Passivity nor Violence: Jesus' Third Way,” in Lull, , SBL 1988 Seminar Papers, 210–24;Google ScholarRinge, Sharon H., Jesus, Liberation and the Biblical Jubilee (Overtures to Biblical Theology 19; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1985)Google Scholar.

25 1 Cor 7:10-11 (cf. Mark 10:11-12 // Matt 5:32; 19:9 // Luke 16:18); 1 Cor 9:14 (cf. Mark 6:8-9 // Matt 10:10 // Luke 9:3; 10:7); 1 Cor 11:23-26 (cf. Mark 14:22-25 // Matt 26:26-29 // Luke 22:14-20).

26 “Rom 12:14 (cf. Matt 5:44); Rom 12:17 (cf. Matt 5:39); Rom 13:7 (cf. Matt 22:15-22); Rom 14:13 (cf. Matt 18:7 // Mark 9:42 // Luke 17:1-2); Rom 14:14 (cf. Matt 15:11 // Mark 7:15); 1 Thess 5:2 (cf. Matt 24:43 // Luke 12:39); 1 Thess 5:13 (cf. Mark 9:50); 1 Thess 5:15 (cf. Matt 5:38-48).

27 Cf. also 1 Cor 14:37, probably referring to 1 Cor 14:26-33a.

28 For a survey of the literature see Fallon, Francis T. and Cameron, Ron, “The Gospel of Thomas: A Forschungsbericht and Analysis,” ANRW 2, 25, 6 (1988) 4213Google Scholar-24.

29 Stendahl, Krister, Paul Among Jews and Gentiles (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1976)Google Scholar.

30 The debate over the precise identity of these “opponents” is well known. For a discussion of the options see Ellis, E. Earle, “Paul and His Opponents: Trends in Research,” in Neusner, Jacob, ed., Christianity, Judaism, and Other Greco-Roman Cults: Studies for Morton Smith at Sixty (4 vols.; Leiden: Brill, 1975) 1. 264-98Google Scholar; for literature, see also Betz, Hans Dieter, Galatians: A Commentary on Paul's Letter to the Churches in Galatia (Hermeneia; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979) n. 22Google Scholar.

31 The speeches and letter in Acts 15 are no doubt relatively late, reflecting conditions in the post-Pauline era.

32 The translation and divisions used throughout are those of Marvin Meyer in Kloppenborg, John S., Meyer, Marvin W., Patterson, Stephen J., and Steinhauser, Michael G., A Q-Thomas Reader (Sonoma, CA: Polebridge, 1990)Google Scholar.

33 See, for example, Scroggs, Robin, “Paul and the Eschatological Woman,” JAAR 40 (1972) 283–303;Google ScholarWalker, Wm. O., “I Corinthians 11:2-16 and Paul's Views Regarding Women,” JBL 94 (1975) 94–110;Google ScholarFiorenza, Elisabeth Schüssler, In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins (New York: Crossroad, 1988) esp. 205–36Google Scholar.

34 So Schottroff, Luise, “Frauen in der Nachfolge Jesu in neutestamentlicher Zeit,” in Schottroff, Willy and Stegemann, Wolfgang, eds., Traditionen der Befreiung, vol. 2: Frauen in der Bibel (München: Kaiser, 1980) 91–133;Google Scholarcontra Schüssler Fiorenza, Memory, 103-54.

35 Meyer, Marvin W., “‘Making Mary Male’: The Categories ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in the Gospel of Thomas,” NTS 31 (1985) 554–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 Castelli, Elizabeth, “Virginity and its Meaning for Women's Sexuality in Early Christianity,” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 2 (1986) 15–11.Google Scholar One is reminded of the macarism that occurs in Gos. Thorn. 79:3: “For there will be days when you say: ‘Blessed are the womb that has not conceived and the breasts that have not given milk.’”

37 So Meeks, Wayne A., “The Image of the Androgyne: Some Uses of a Symbol in Earliest Christianity,” HR 13 (1974) 196.Google Scholar For Thecla's disguise see the Acts of Paul and Thecla 3.25; 40.

38 See MacDonald, Dennis Ronald, The Legend and the Apostle: The Battle for Paul in Story and Canon (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1983) 17–33Google Scholar.

39 In popular literature of the period the dangers a woman traveler might encounter are exploited for the purposes of titillation in Xenophon's Ephesiaca; for a readily available translation of this text see Hadas, Moses, Three Greek Romances (Library of Liberal Arts; Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1964) 71–126Google Scholar.

40 This is Theissen's interpretation of 1 Cor 9:3-18; 2 Cor 11:7-15, 12:13; see his “Legitimation und Lebensunterhalt. Ein Beitrag zur Soziologie urchristlicher Missionare,” in Studien; ET: “Legitimation and Subsistence: An Essay on the Sociology of Early Christian Missionaries,” in idem, The Social Setting of Pauline Christianity: Essays on Corinth (trans, and ed. Schutz, John H.; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982) 40–54Google Scholar.

41 So Horsley, Richard A., “Pneumatikos vs. Psychikos: Distinctions of Spiritual Status among the Corinthians,” HTR 69 (1976) 269–88;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Horsley takes as his point of departure the earlier work of Jacques Dupont, , Gnosis: La connaissance religieuse dans les épitres de Saint Paul (Paris: Gabalda, 1949) 172–80, andGoogle ScholarPearson, Birger Albert, The Pneumatikos Psychikos Terminology in 1 Corinthians (SBLDS 12; Missoula: Scholars Press, 1973) 11–12,Google Scholar 17-21. See also Hurd, John Coolidge, The Origins of 1 Corinthians (London: SPCK, 1965); andGoogle ScholarWilckens, Ulrich, Weisheit und Torheit: Eine exegetisch-religionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zu l.Kor 1 und 2 (BHTh 26; Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck, 1959)Google Scholar.

42 For the position that Paul has composed the speech to mimic the wisdom style of those whom he opposes in Corinth see Pearson, Pneumatikos-Psych1Kos Terminology, 27-42; cf. Conzelmann, Hans, I Corinthians (Hermeneia; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1975) 57–60Google Scholar.

43 Koester, Helmut, “Gnostic Writings as Witnesses for the Development of the Sayings Tradition,” in Layton, Bentley, ed., The Rediscovery of Gnosticism, vol. 1: The School of Valentinus (Studies in the History of Religions 16; Leiden: Brill, 1980) 248–50;Google Scholaridem, Ancient Christian Gospels: Their History and Development (Philadelphia: Trinity, 1990) 55–62.Google Scholar Koester calls attention to similarities in the language of 1 Corinthians 1-4 and several sayings in the Gospel of Thomas. He suggests that a sayings collection common to both Thomas and Paul may account for such similarities. Cf. the similar remarks of James M. Robinson, “Kerygma and History in the New Testament,” in idem and Koester, Trajectories through Early Christianity (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1971) 42–43. Robinson, however, points to Q rather than Thomas: “First Corinthians and Q have in common the issue of Jesus and Wisdom. It is possible that the Q material may in part have had a Sitz im Leben similar to the conflict in Corinth; that is to say, the prevalent Bultmannian assumption that the sayings of the Lord are not likely to have played a role in Pauline Christianity might not be as obvious as it has seemed.”

44 Eastern Syria is the provenance suggested most often for the Gospel of Thomas; see esp. Puech, H. -Ch., “The Gospel of Thomas,” in NTApoc 1: 286Google Scholar; Gospels and Related Writings (trans. Wilson, R. McL.; Philadelphia: Westminster, 1963) 286Google Scholar; Guey, Julien, “Comment le ‘denier de César’ de l'evangile a-I-il pu devenir une pièce d'or,” Bulletin de la Société Française de Numismatique 15 (1960) 478–79;Google ScholarKlijn, A. F. J., “John XIV 22 and the Name Judas Thomas,” in Studies in John Presented to Prof. Dr. J. N. Sevenster on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday, NovTSup 24 (1970) 88–96;Google Scholaridem, “Christianity in Edessa and the Gospel of Thomas,” NovT 14 (1972) 70–77;Google Scholarcontra Ehlers, Barbara, “Kann das Thomasevangelium aus Edessa stammen?” NovT 12 (1970) 284–317Google Scholar.

45 Koester, (Ancient Christian Gospels, 60)Google Scholar notes the connection, and suggests that Paul's comments amount to an ironic rendering of Gos. Thom. 2.

46 I refer here to Kloppenborg's formative layer of Q (or Q1), a collection of wisdom speeches in which there is no reflection upon the nature of Jesus' death as a saving event (Formation, esp. 171-245). Cf. Mack, , Myth of Innocence, 86Google Scholar.

47 This is the fundamental insight suggested by the collected essays of Robinson and Koester in Trajectories.

48 So Kloppenborg, , Formation, 102–70, 322-25Google Scholar.

49 Robinson, James M.Google Scholar, “Logoi Sophon: On the Gattung of Q,” in idem andKoester, , Trajectories, 76–85Google Scholar.