Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-11T11:18:44.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on the Phoenician Inscription from Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

Javier Teixidor
Javier Teixidor
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Purchase
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Observations
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , April 1975 , pp. 197 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Nueva inscripción fenicia de España (Hispania 14),” Rivista degli studi orientali 41 (1966) 97–108; pls. I–II.

2 Cf. M. G. Guzzo Amadasi, Le iscrizioni fenicie e puniche delle colonie in occidente (Rome: 1967) 149–51; and the articles mentioned in J. Teixidor, “Bull, d'épigr. sém.,” Syria 45 (1968) 369–70; 48 (1971) 476; and 49 (1972) 435. The two remaining points of dispute are the reconstruction of the first word in line 1, and the interpretation of the group bnyš'l in line 3.

3 “The Old Phoenician Inscription from Spain Dedicated to Hurrian Astarte,” HTR 64 (1971) 189–95.Google Scholar

4 See his remarks in Orientalia 52 (1971) 431–32,Google Scholar followed by Herrmann, W., “˓t trt — ḥr,” Die Welt des Orients 7 (1973) 135–36.Google Scholar

5 Cf. Helck, W., Die Beziehungen Ägyptens zu Vorderasien im 3. und 2. Jahrtausend v. Chr. (Wiesbaden: 1962) 493–94.Google Scholar

6 The date is based on palaeographic grounds; see Solá-Solé, “Nueva inscription,” 107, and Cross, “The Old Phoenician Inscription,” 193.

7 See Helck, Die Beziehungen Ägyptens, 275.

8 Ancient Egyptian Onomastica (London: Oxford University Press, 1947) 181*–82*.Google Scholar

9 Stadelmann, R., Syrisch-Palästinensische Gottheiten in Ägypten (Leiden: 1967) 107.Google Scholar

10 See Stadelmann, 104, and Leclant, J., art. “Astarte,” in W., Helck and E., Otto (eds.), Lexikon der Ägyptologie I 4 (Wiesbaden: 1973) cols. 499–509.Google Scholar

11 See Kiessling, E. (“Die Götter von Memphis in Griechisch-Römischer Zeit,” Archiv für Papyrusforschung 15 [1953] 21–22Google Scholar and 41) who correlates the text of Herodotus and the mention of the Phoinikaigyptioi of Memphis in a third-century B.C. Greek papyrus (Soc. ital. die Firenze, pap. gr. e lat. V, no. 531). It is noteworthy that Aimé-Giron, M. N. (Textes araméens d'Égypte [Cairo: 1931] 59–61Google Scholar) has drawn a parallel between the term “encampment” (stratopedori) used by Herodotus and that of degel which appears in fifth-century Aramaic Documents from Egypt; Porten, B. (Archives from Elephantine [Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968] 28–35)Google Scholar correctly interprets degel as being a “socio-military unit.”.