Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T22:22:19.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Menander's Dyskolos and Demetrios of Phaleron's Dilemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2009

David Wiles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Critics have been fairly unanimous in their assessment of Menander's concerns. F. H. Sandbach asserts that ‘the authors of New Comedy shut their eyes, generally speaking, to politics as a whole’. He writes of Menander that ‘the politics of his time were far too grim and frustrated to make a suitable subject for an audience that wished to be entertained on a public holiday.… It is within domestic and private life that he found the subjects for his comedy’. T. B. L. Webster agrees that recent political events were ‘too painful to be remembered in comedy’. E. W. Handley believes that in Dyskolos Menander's ‘basic point is an ethical and not a political one’; considering the possibility that ‘the thought and moral tone are politically inspired’, he dismisses the idea that Menander was a propagandist. Michael Anderson recognizes that Dyskolos, as an ‘ethical’ comedy in Aristotelian terms, must relate the behaviour of individuals to society, but he does not go on to relate the play to the particular society for which Menander wrote.

Type
Research Article
Information
Greece & Rome , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , October 1984 , pp. 170 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The Comic Theatre of Greece and Rome (London, 1977), p. 69Google Scholar.

2. Gomme, A. W. and Sandbach, F. H.Menander – a Commentary (London, 1973), pp. 23–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3. An Introduction to Menander (London, 1974), p. 4Google Scholar.

4. The Dyskolos of Menander (London, 1965) pp. 8–9Google Scholar.

5. ‘Kneraon's Hamartia’ G&R 17 (1970), 207Google Scholar.

6. Plut., Demetr. 12Google Scholar.

7. For problems of dating, see Gomme, and Sandbach, op. cit. (above n. 2), pp. 128–9Google Scholar.

8. The most thorough study of the period remains: Ferguson, W. S., Hellenistic Athens (London, 1911)Google Scholar.

9. Plut., Phokion 21, 5, 4, 20, 18, 4, 19, 7, 28ff., 34Google Scholar; 18.66.

10. Plut., Phokion 37–8Google Scholar.

11. The word ochlos of ten sustains oligarchic overtones. Compare Dyskolos 7, 8, 166, 932 with Theophr., Char. 26.3Google Scholar; Pseudo-Xen., Constitution of Athens 2.10Google Scholar; Men., Sikyonios 150, 161Google Scholar.

12. Cf. Mossé, Claude, Athens in Decline (London, 1973), pp. 114–15Google Scholar.

13. Cf. Isoc. 8.108; Lys. 28.12; Arist.., Ath. Pol. 37–8Google Scholar.

14. Plut., Demetr. 23Google Scholar.

15. Pol. 1295aff.

16. Ath. 245a–c; for Demetrios' legislation, see W. S. Ferguson, op. cit. (above n. 8) Chapter 2.

17. Plut., Mor. 842Google Scholar.

18. Resp. 555d.

19. Plut., Mor. 349bGoogle Scholar.

20. Pol. 1309a 17ff.

21. Demochares in Polyb. 12.16.

22. Thuc. 1.6.

23. Cf. Davies, J. K., Athenian Propertied Families (London, 1971), p. 18 n. 4Google Scholar.

24. Mosse, Claude, La fin de la démocratie athénienne (Paris, 1962), pp. 308–9Google Scholar.

25. Cf. Plut., Phokion 30Google Scholar; Arist., Eth. Nic. 1123a 19ffGoogle Scholar.

26. Plut., Phokion 27.3Google Scholar.

27. Ferguson, W. S., op. cit. (above n. 8), p. 46Google Scholar.

28. Ibid. 62; cf. Mossé, C., op. cit. (above n. 12), p. 105Google Scholar; on the old ideal, cf. Arist., Pol. 1305a 10ff.Google Scholar; Isoc. 8.54; Eup. fr. 103.

29. Ath. 542c–f, 593a.

30. Plut., Aristeides 1.9Google Scholar.

31. Peri Eusebeias in Porph., Abst. 2.11–12Google Scholar; Diog. Laert. 5.39, 5.36.

32. Char. 21, 23.

33. Teles On Poverty and Wealth, ed. Hense, p. 40.

34. Diog. Laert. 6.90.

35. Diog. Laert. 5.79; Phaedrus 5.1.

36. ‘Mystery Elements in Menander's Dyscolus’, TAPA 100 (1969), 209–220Google Scholar.

37. Oec. 6.8, 4.2; cf. Mem. 4.ii.22.

38. Pl. Leg. 743d; Arist. Pol. 1296b 28.

39. Op. cit. (above n. 4), p. 9.

40. Op. cit. (above n. 1), p. 85.

41. Op. cit. (above n. 4), p. 284; op. cit. (above n. 2), pp. 267–8.

42. Op. cit. (above n. 4), p. 285.

43. Op. cit. (above n. 2), pp. 268–9.

44. The text of this scene is corrupt. Here and throughout, I follow Sandbach's OCT edition.

45. Resp. 568e–569c.

46. Plut., Phokion 35Google Scholar, Demetr. 9.

47. For the topicality of this passage, cf. Corte, Francesco della ‘Menandro, l'attore Aristodemo, e la morte di Focione’, Maia 12 (1960), 83–8Google Scholar.

48. Diog. Laert. 5.75; Demochares in Polyb. 12.13.

49. cf. Mossé, C., op. cit. (above n. 12), p. 107Google Scholar.

50. Demetrios in Diog. Laert. 5.82.