Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T19:41:26.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Imagery of Lucretius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Extract

In explaining to Memmius his purpose in writing De Rerum Natura Lucretius wrote:

nec me animi fallit Graiorum obscura reperta

difficile inlustrare Latinis vxsersibus esse

multa novis verbis praesertim cum sit agendum

propter egestatem linguae et rerum novitatem.

He thus showed that he realized the difficulty of his task in making the Latin tongue express what it had never expressed before. But in spite of the poverty of Latin and the apparently unpoetic nature of his subject, he has proclaimed his philosophy in language that shows him a poet. For the ancient word ‘poet’ has truth in its root (πoıητής); a poet is a maker who, by using words in new ways, makes a new world; he is also, as the Romans knew, a seer, not one who foretells the future, but one who tells forth truths that lie hidden behind appearances.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1 note 1 i. 136–9.

page 1 note 2 v. 850.

page 1 note 3 Dr. , Bailey translation in T. Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura libri sex (Oxford, 1947).Google Scholar

page 1 note 4 vi. 17–23.

page 2 note 1 iii. 1–3.

page 3 note 1 Ann. II, fr. xxiv.

page 3 note 2 Ann. I., fr. lxxii e.

page 3 note 3 Cic. De Re Publica I. xli. 64.

page 3 note 4 iii. 1033.

page 3 note 5 iii. 1042.

page 3 note 6 iii. 1043–4.

page 4 note 1 ii. 147–8.

page 4 note 2 v. 281–2.

page 4 note 3 ii. 212.

page 4 note 4 iv. 450.

page 4 note 5 v. 384.

page 4 note 6 v. 575–6.

page 4 note 7 v. 692–3.

page 4 note 8 v. 1436–7.

page 5 note 1 ii. 316–20.

page 5 note 2 i. 402.

page 5 note 3 v. 597–601.

page 6 note 1 v. 602–3.

page 6 note 2 v. 43–4.

page 6 note 3 iv. 524.

page 6 note 4 i. 404–9.

page 7 note 1 i. 187.

page 7 note 2 ii. 11–12.

page 7 note 3 v. 179–80.

page 7 note 4 ii. 192.

page 7 note 5 Prop. III. vii. 3.

page 7 note 6 Prop. 1. xvii. 23–4.

page 8 note 1 ii. 32–3.

page 8 note 2 i. 247.

page 8 note 3 iv. 743.

page 8 note 4 iv. 87–8.

page 8 note 5 Address before the Royal Institute of Great Britain, 23 Feb. 1945, p. 5.

page 8 note 6 v. 389.

page 8 note 7 i. 418.

page 8 note 8 vi. 42.

page 9 note 1 iv. 513–21.

page 9 note 2 iv. 505–6.

page 9 note 3 v. 67–9 (cf. v. 451–3).

page 9 note 4 v. 928–9.

page 10 note 1 Notes on , Lucretius, Criterion, 1931–2, pp. 25 f.Google Scholar

page 10 note 2 i. 75–7.

page 10 note 3 ii. 7–9.