Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T23:13:20.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regionalist Parties and the Mobilization of Territorial Difference in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2013

Eve Hepburn  and
Dan Hough
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis of political regionalism and regionalist parties has traditionally neglected the case of Germany. We argue that this is a curious ommission. This article looks to redress this balance by applying frameworks created for understanding the determinants of regionalist party success to the Bavarian Christian Social Union (CSU) and the eastern Germany Party of Democratic Socialism (1990–2005, PDS). Although very different in terms of their politics, both parties have been successful as they have followed strategies and tactics evident in the broader regionalist parties' literature. This article therefore deepens our knowledge of regionalism in Germany, while also testing regionalist literatures in a new country-context.

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , 2012 , pp. 74 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2012.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Staab, A., National Identity in Eastern Germany: Inner Unification or Continued Separation?, Westport, CT, Praeger, 1998 Google Scholar; Grix, J. and Cooke, P. (eds), East German Distinctiveness in a Unified Germany, Birmingham, Birmingham University Press, 2003 Google Scholar.

2 Using precise terminology when analysing the development of the PDS and Left Party can be difficult and cumbersome. This is largely because the party changed its name from the PDS to the Left Party in the run-up to the 2005 election and then, technically speaking, merged with another party (WASG) in 2007 – even though it kept precisely the same name as it had in the period before. For the purposes of clarity and consistency we use the term PDS throughout. We do this for the simple reason that we are predominantly interested in discussing the PDS's development during its existence as an unambiguously regionalist political party (i.e. 1990–2005). For an analysis of the PDS's development into the Left Party see J. Olsen, ‘The Merger of the PDS and WASG: From Eastern German Regional Party to National Radical Left Party?’, German Politics, 16: 2 (2007), pp. 205–21.

3 Sutherland, C., ‘“Nation, Heimat, Vaterland”: The Reinvention of Concepts by the Bavarian CSU Party’, German Politics, 10: 3 (2001), pp. 13–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hough, D., ‘“Made in Eastern Germany”: The PDS and the Articulation of Eastern German Interests’, German Politics, 9: 2 (2000), pp. 125–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 S. Newman, Ethnoregional Conflict in Democracies: Mostly Ballots, Rarely Bullets, Westport, CT, Greenwood, 1996; L. De Winter and H. Türsan (eds), Regionalist Parties in Western Europe, London and New York, Routledge, 1998; L. De Winter, M. Gómez-Reino and P. Lynch (eds), Autonomist Parties in Europe: Identity Politics and the Revival of the Territorial Cleavage, Barcelona, Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials, 2006.

5 De Winter and Türsan, Regionalist Parties in Western Europe.

6 Snyder, L., Encyclopaedia of Nationalism, New York, Paragon House, 1990 Google Scholar.

7 H. Türsan, ‘Introduction: Ethnoregionalist Parties as Ethnic Entrepreneurs’, in De Winter and Türsan, Regionalist Parties in Western Europe, p. 6.

8 De Winter et al., Autonomist Parties in Europe, p. 14.

9 Hepburn, E., ‘Introduction: Re-Conceptualizing Sub-State Mobilization’, Regional and Federal Studies, 19: 4–5 (2009), p. 482 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Jeffery, C., ‘New Research Agendas on Regional Party Competition’, Regional and Federal Studies, 19: 4–5 (2009), pp. 639–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 M. Keating, ‘The Invention of Regions: Political Restructuring and Territorial Government in Western Europe’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15: 4 (1997), pp. 383–98; M. Keating, The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 1998.

12 Keating, ‘The Invention of Regions’.

13 Sutherland, ‘“Nation, Heimat, Vaterland”’; Grix and Cooke, East German Distinctiveness.

14 Hepburn, E., ‘The Neglected Nation: The CSU and the Territorial Cleavage in Bavarian Party Politics’, German Politics, 17: 2 (2008), pp. 184–202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hough, D. and Koss, M., ‘A Regional(ist) Party in Denial? The German PDS and its Arrival in Unified Germany’, Regional and Federal Studies, 19: 4–5 (2009), pp. 579–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Tarrow, S., Power in Movements, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994 Google Scholar.

16 F. Müller-Rommel, ‘Ethnoregionalist Parties in Western Europe: Theoretical Considerations and Framework of Analysis’, in De Winter and Türsan, Regionalist Parties in Western Europe.

17 L. De Winter, ‘Conclusion: A Comparative Analysis of the Electoral, Office and Policy Success of Ethnoregionalist Parties’, in De Winter and Türsan, Regionalist Parties in Western Europe.

18 S. Padgett and T. Burkett, Political Parties and Elections in West Germany: The Search for a New Stability, London, C. Hurst, 1986, p. 115.

19 James, P., The Politics of Bavaria, Aldershot, Avebury, 1995 Google Scholar.

20 M. Münter and R. Sturm, ‘Economic Consequences of German Unification’, German Politics, 11: 3 (2002), pp. 179–94; W. Gellner and G. Strohmeier, ‘The “Double” Public: Germany after Reunification’, German Politics, 11: 3 (2002), pp. 59–82; R. J. Dalton and S. Weldon, ‘Germans Divided? Political Culture in a United Germany’, German Politics, 19: 1 (2010), pp. 9–23.

21 Grix, J., ‘East German Political Attitudes: Socialist Legacies v. Situational Factors: A False Antithesis’, German Politics, 9: 2(2000), pp. 109–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Dorondo, D. R., Bavaria and German Federalism. Reich to Republic, 1918–33, 1945–49, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1992 Google Scholar.

23 Sutherland, ‘“Nation, Heimat, Vaterland”’; G. Ford, ‘Constructing a Regional Identity: The Christian Social Union and Bavaria's Common Heritage, 1949–62’, Contemporary European History, 16: 3 (2007), pp. 277–97; Hepburn, ‘The Neglected Nation’.

24 Mintzel, A., ‘The Christian Social Union in Bavaria: Analytical Notes on its Development, Role and Political Success’, in Kaase, M. and von Beyme, K. (eds), Elections and Parties, London, Sage, 1978, p. 204 Google Scholar.

25 A. Mintzel, ‘Political and Socio-Economic Developments in the Postwar Era: The Case of Bavaria 1945–1989’, in K. Rohe (ed.), Elections, Parties and Political Traditions. Social Foundations of German Parties and German Party Systems 1867–1987, New York and Oxford, Berg, 1990.

26 Carl-Sime, C., ‘Bavaria, the CSU and the West German Party System’, West European Politics, 2 (1979), pp. 89–107 Google Scholar; Mintzel, A., ‘Specificities of Bavarian Political Culture’, in Berg-Schlosser, D. and Rytlewski, R. (eds), Political Culture in Germany, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1993 Google Scholar.

27 Ford, ‘Constructing a Regional Identity’.

28 Mintzel, ‘Specificities of Bavarian Political Culture’, p. 109; Sutherland ‘“Nation, Heimat, Vaterland”’.

29 James, P., ‘Franz Josef Strauß: Lasting Legacy or Transitory Phenomenon?’, German Politics, 7: 2 (1998), pp. 200–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Ibid., p. 205

31 James, The Politics of Bavaria, p. 3.

32 Mintzel, ‘Political and Socio-Economic Developments in the Postwar Era’.

33 Hepburn, E., Using Europe: Territorial Party Strategies in a Multi-Level System, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 A. Mintzel, Die CSU-Hegemonie in Bayern: Strategie und Erfolg; Gewinner und Verlierer, Passau, Wiss.-Verl. Rothe, 1999, p. 115.

35 James, P., ‘End of an Era? The Landtagswahl in Bavaria, September 2008’, German Politics, 18: 1 (2009), pp. 103–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 F. Oswald, The Party that Came Out of the Cold War: The Party of Democratic Socialism in United Germany, London, Praeger, 2002.

37 P. Barker, ‘From the SED to the PDS: Continuity or Renewal?’, in German Monitor: The Party of Democratic Socialism. Modern Post-Communism or Nostalgic Populism?, Amsterdam, Rodopi B.V, 1998, vol. 42, pp. 1–17.

38 Hough, D., Olsen, J. and Koss, M., The Left Party in Contemporary German Politics, London, Palgrave, 2007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Roberts, G. K., ‘“Emigrants in Their Own Country”: German Reunification and its Political Consequences’, Parliamentary Affairs, 44 (1991), pp. 373–88Google Scholar.

40 Hough ‘“Made in Eastern Germany”’.

41 C. Lees, ‘Bringing the PDS into the Coalition Equation’, German Politics, 4: 1 (1995), pp. 150–4.

42 Hough et al., The Left Party in Contemporary German Politics.

43 Tarrow, Power in Movements; Müller-Rommel, ‘Ethnoregionalist Parties in Western Europe’.

44 C. Wagemann, ‘Once Again the Deviant Case? Why the Christlich-Soziale Union Only Partially Fulfils the Image of an “Alpine Populist Party”’, in D. Caramani and Y. Mény (eds), Challenges to Consensual Politics: Democracy, Identity and Populist Protest in the Alpine Region, Brussels, Peter Lang, 2005, p. 180.

45 Ford, ‘Constructing a Regional Identity, p. 286.

46 The PDS has, as has already been noted, also acted as a support party in Saxony-Anhalt (1994–2002). The PDS's successor, the Left Party, also entered government in another eastern state, Brandenburg, in 2009.

47 S. M. Lipset, Consensus and Conflict: Essays in Political Sociology, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction, 1985; B. M. Meguid, ‘Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success’, American Political Science Review, 99: 3 (2005), pp. 347–59.