1 Dahl, Robert A., ‘The Behavioural Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest’, American Political Science Review, vol. LV. 1961, pp. 763–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Ibid., p. 767.

3 Barbrook, Alec, Patterens of Political Behaviour, London, Martin Robertson, 1975 p. v.Google Scholar

4 See his chapter two.

5 Almond, G. and Verba, S., The Civic Culture, Boston, Little Brown, 1965 Google Scholar. and Campbell, A. et al. The American Voter, New York, Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar

6 Lipset, S. M., Political Man, London, William Heinemann 1960.Google Scholar

7 For example, Lijphart, A., ‘Consociational Democracy’ World Politics, vol. 21, 1968–9 pp. 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Page 76.

9 Verba, S., ‘Organizational Membership and Democratic Consensus’, Journal of Politics, vol. 27, 1965, pp. 467–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Barelson, Bernard R., et al., Voting, London, University of Chicago Press, 1954.Google Scholar

11 Page 219.

12 Lazarsfeld, P., The People’s Choice, London, Columbia University Press, 1944 Google Scholar. This was the first of the sample surveys to which Elcock presumably refers.

13 A stunning assessment is given very briefly in Przeworski, A and Teune, H., The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, London, Wiley, 1970. pp. 27–29.Google Scholar

14 Crewe, , ‘The Politics of “Affluent” and “Traditional” Workers in Britain: an Aggregate Data Analysis’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 3. Part 1, 1973, pp. 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Rose, R., Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook, London, Collier Macmillan, 1974.Google Scholar

16 Page 305