Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T05:12:53.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Europe between the United States and the Soviet Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Pierre Hassner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘EUROPE BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE SOVIET UNION’. This subject could have been formulated in different terms, such as: ‘Europe between East and West’ or: ‘The European states between the two empires’ or: ‘The two Europes and the two superpowers’. Europe is at the same time one geographically and culturally, divided into nations, and split into two camps. The United States and the Soviet Union are both two global and two European powers, two ordinary states and the leaders of two alliances, the standard bearers of two ideologies. If one were discussing Korea instead of Europe, one would hesitate between calling our study ‘Korea between East and West’ and ‘Korea between North and South’. Europe is that continent where political divisions seem cast in the stone of history and geography, where the opposition between East and West seems to have at the same time a geopolitical meaning (that of maritime versus continental coalition), an ideological one (liberal democracy or capitalism versus communism) and a cultural one (the Western Church versus the Eastern one, Rome versus Byzantium).

Type
Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , 01 January 1986 , pp. 17 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gaddis, J. The Postwar International System, Elements of Stability and Instability, The Nobel Symposium on the Study of War and Peace, 1985, mimeograph.Google Scholar

2 Soedjatmoko, Patterns of Armed Conflict in the Third World, The Nobel Symposium, mimeograph.

3 Porte, Anton de Europe between the Superpowers. The Enduring Balance, New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1979, p. VIII.Google Scholar

4 See my paper for the 8th IPSA Congress in Munich, 1970, entitled ‘System, States, Societies’.

5 Gallimard, 1985. See my critique in Le Monde, 25 June 1985, and in Intervention, 13, 07—August—Sept. 1985.Google ScholarPubMed

6 On this duality of inspirations for the European identity (as a preserved zone or as a community of values) see B. Kohler ‘Ist die EG noch Zeitgemass?’, Aus Politik und Zeitgesckickte, 9 June 1984, pp. 21–30.

7 On the ambiguities of cultural Europe see F. Bondy, ‘Europa ohne Grenzen’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 9 June 1984, pp. 21–30. On those of Christian Europe see Barbieri, Frane ‘Due Santi fra Mosca e il Papa’, La Stampa, 5 07 1985 .Google Scholar

8 Particularly, ‘Soviet Policy in Western Europe: the East European Factor’, ch. 10, pp. 285–315 in Sarah Meiklejohn Terry (ed.), Soviet Policy in Eastern Europe, The Council on Foreign Relations, 1984.

9 Izuestia, 9 June 1980. See the commentary by D. Vernet in Le Monde, 11 July 1980.

10 Portugalov, N. ‘Behind the looking glass’, Literaturnaya Gazetu, 6 08 1980 .Google Scholar

11 Das Ende des Ideologischen Zeitalters — Die Europaisierung Europas, Siedler Verlag, 1981.

12 ‘ The Future of Yalta’, Foreign Affairs, Winter 1984–5, pp. 279–303.Google Scholar