Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T05:29:35.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pleasing Any of the People, Some of the Time: Perceptions of Redistribution and Attitudes to Welfare*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Extract

HOW DO PEOPLE'S IDEAS ABOUT REDISTRIBUTION AND STATE welfare affect their political judgments? The issue is of interest for practical and theoretical reasons. A party which presents egalitarian redistribution as a central social-policy objective has been replaced in government by one which does not. Various writers suggest that a lack of popular support for redistribution contributed to this change, whether because the experience of economic decline undermines altruism; because there is an anti-welfare backlash at the level of ideology; or because the least redistributive welfare services benefit the better-off groups who are also more influential .Thus free sixth-form and university education, mortgage interest relief and occupational pension subsidy are favoured, whereas rent subsidy, low wage supplementation and unemployment benefit are not. Underlying these arguments is the suggestion that welfare programmes, to the extent that they are seen to contradict popular desires, will contribute to a generalized decline in support for government.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Alt, J., The Politics of Economic Decline, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1979, p. 258 Google Scholar.

2 Golding, P. and Middleton, S., Images of Welfare, London, Martin Robertson, 1982 Google Scholar.

3 Le Grand, J., ‘The Future of the Welfare State’, New Society, vol. 68, p. 385 Google Scholar

4 Douglas, J., ‘The Over‐Loaded Crown’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 6, pp. 483505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Le Grand, J., The Strategy of Equality, London, George Allen & Unwin, 1982, p. 137 Google Scholar.

6 O’Higgins, M., ‘Welfare, Redistribution and Inequality’, University of Bath, mimeo, 1984, p. 15 Google Scholar.

7 O’Higgins, M. and Ruggles, P., ‘The Distribution of Public Expenditure and Taxes among Households in the UK’, Review of Income and Wealth, vol. 27, pp. 298326 Google Scholar

8 op. cit., 1982, p. 32.

9 Halsey, A., Heath, A. and Ridge, J., Origins and Destinatioms, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1980, pp. 202–4Google Scholar.

10 Hadley, r. and Hatch, S., Social Welfare and the Failure of the State, London, George Allen & Unwin, 1981, ch. 3 and 7Google Scholar.

11 Westergaard, J. and Resler, H., Class in a Capitalist Society, Heinemann, 1981, Part 1Google Scholar.

12 Lewis, A., ‘Attitudes to Public Expenditure’, Political Studies, vol. 29, pp. 284–92Google Scholar.

13 Beedle, P. and Taylor‐Gooby, P., ‘Ambivalence and Altruism’, Policy and Politics, vol. 11, pp. 1540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Jowell, R. and Airey, C., British Social Attitudes: the 1984 Report, London, Gower. 1984 Google Scholar.

15 See Taylor‐Gooby, P., Public Opinion, Ideology and State Welfare, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985, ch. 2 for a reviewGoogle Scholar.

16 Judge, K., Smith, J. and Taylor‐Gooby, P., ‘Public Opinion and the Privatisation of Welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, vol. 12, pp. 469–90Google Scholar.