Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T09:58:29.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PRIME SPECTRA OF AMBISKEW POLYNOMIAL RINGS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2018

CHRISTOPHER D. FISH
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Hicks Building, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom e-mail: christopher.fish@cantab.net, d.a.jordan@sheffield.ac.uk
DAVID A. JORDAN
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Hicks Building, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom e-mail: christopher.fish@cantab.net, d.a.jordan@sheffield.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We determine sufficient criteria for the prime spectrum of an ambiskew polynomial algebra R over an algebraically closed field 𝕂 to be akin to those of two of the principal examples of such an algebra, namely the universal enveloping algebra U(sl2) (in characteristic 0) and its quantization Uq(sl2) (when q is not a root of unity). More precisely, we determine sufficient criteria for the prime spectrum of R to consist of 0, the ideals (z − λ)R for some central element z of R and all λ ∈ 𝕂, and, for some positive integer d and each positive integer m, d height two prime ideals P for which R/P has Goldie rank m.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 2018 

References

REFERENCES

1. Bavula, V. V., Generalized Weyl algebras and their representations, Algebra iAnal. 4 (3) (1992), 7597; English transl. in St. Petersburg Math. J. 4 (1993), 71–92.Google Scholar
2. Bavula, V. V., Filter dimension of algebras and modules, a simplicity criterion for generalized Weyl algebras, Commun. Algebra 24 (1996), 19711992.Google Scholar
3. Brown, K. A. and Goodearl, K. R., Lectures on algebraic quantum groups, Advanced courses in mathematics – CRM Barcelona (Birkhäuser, Basel, Boston, Berlin, 2002).Google Scholar
4. Chatters, A. W., Non-commutative unique factorization domains, Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 95 (1) (1984), 4954.Google Scholar
5. Dixmier, J., Enveloping algebras, Graduate studies in mathematics, vol. 11 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996).Google Scholar
6. Fish, C. D. and Jordan, D. A., Connected quantized Weyl algebras and quantum cluster algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra (2017), DOI:10.1016/j.jpaa2017.09.019.Google Scholar
7. Jordan, D. A., Iterated skew polynomial rings and quantum groups, J. Algebra 174 (1993), 267281.Google Scholar
8. Jordan, D. A., Height one prime ideals of certain iterated skew polynomial rings, Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 114 (1993), 407425.Google Scholar
9. Jordan, D. A., Primitivity in skew Laurent polynomial rings and related rings, Math. Z. 213 (1993), 353371.Google Scholar
10. Jordan, D. A., Down-up algebras and ambiskew polynomial rings, J. Algebra 228 (2000), 311346.Google Scholar
11. Jordan, D. A. and Wells, I. E., Invariants for automorphisms of certain iterated skew polynomial rings, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 39 (1996), 461472.Google Scholar
12. Jordan, D. A. and Wells, I. E., Simple ambiskew polynomial rings, J. Algebra 382 (2013), 4670.Google Scholar
13. McConnell, J. C. and Pettit, J. J., Crossed products and multiplicative analogues of Weyl algebras, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 38 (2) (1988), 4755.Google Scholar
14. McConnell, J. C. and Robson, J. C., Noncommutative noetherian rings, (Wiley, Chichester, 1987).Google Scholar
15. Smith, S. P., A class of algebras similar to the enveloping algebra of sl(2, ℂ), Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 322 (1990), 285314.Google Scholar
16. Terwilliger, P. and Worawannotai, C., Augmented down-up algebras and uniform posets, Ars Math. Contemp. 6 (2) (2013), 409417.Google Scholar