¹ Derrida, Jacques, Rogues: Two Essays on Reason (Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas tr., 2003).Google Scholar

² Id. at 66.Google Scholar

³ National Security Council of USA, National Security Strategy (September 2002).Google Scholar

⁴ National Security Council of USA, National Security Strategy (May 2010).Google Scholar

⁵ Bauman, Zygmunt, Social Issues of Law and Order, 40 British Journal of Criminology 205, 207 (2000).Google Scholar

⁶ Gerry Simpson, Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order (2004).Google Scholar

⁷ Derrida, supra note 2, at 66.Google Scholar

⁸ United Nations Charter art. 2(1): “The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.”Google Scholar

⁹ Simpson, supra note 7, at 280–281.Google Scholar

¹⁰ See for example, Saunders, Elizabeth N., Setting Boundaries: Can International Society Exclude ‘Rogue States'?, 8 Int. Stu. Rev. 23 (2006).Google Scholar

¹¹ Litwak, Robert S., The New Calculus of Pre-emption, 44(4) Survival 53, 67 (2002-3).Google Scholar

¹² Caprioli, Mary & Trumbore, Peter F., Identifying ‘Rogue’ States and Testing their Interstate Conflict Behaviour, 9(3) EJIR 377, 378 (2003).Google Scholar

¹³ Yoo, John, Using Force, 71(3) Univ. Chi. L.R. 729, 783 (2004).Google Scholar

¹⁴ Litwak, Robert S., Rogue States and US Foreign Policy: Containment After the Cold War (2000).Google Scholar

¹⁵ US NSS 2002, supra note 4, at 14.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Madeleine Albright, Speech at Tennessee University, State, (Feb. 19 1998), available at: http://secretary.state.gov/www/statements/1998/980219b.html (last accessed: 24 April 2012).Google Scholar

¹⁷ Derrida, supra note 2, at 66.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Rice, Condoleezza, Promoting the National Interest, 79(1) Foreign Affairs 45, 46 (2000).Google Scholar

¹⁹ Lake, Anthony, Confronting Backlash States, 73(2) Foreign Affairs 45, 55 (1994).Google Scholar

²⁰ Litwak, Robert S., Rogue States: A Handy Label but a Lousy Policy, The Washington Post, (Feb. 20, 2000).Google Scholar

²¹ Litwak, supra note 15, at 75.Google Scholar

²² Saunders, supra note 11, at 28; Litwak, supra note 15, at 11.Google Scholar

²³ UN Charter art. 2(7): “Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any stateGoogle Scholar

²⁴ Derrida, supra note 2, at xiii.Google Scholar

²⁵ Id. at 10–14.Google Scholar

²⁶ Id. at 21.Google Scholar

²⁷ Id. at 97.Google Scholar

²⁸ UN Charter art. 24(1): “In order to ensure prompt and effective action by the United Nations, its Members confer on the Security Council primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security, and agree that in carrying out its duties under this responsibility the Security Council acts on their behalf.”Google Scholar

²⁹ UN Charter art. 25: “The Members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council in accordance with the present Charter.”Google Scholar

³⁰ Matthew Happold, Security Council Resolution 1373 and the Constitution of the United Nations, 16 Leiden Journal of International Law (LJIL) 593 (2003).Google Scholar

³¹ Article 27(3) UN: “Decisions of the Security Council on all other matters shall be made by an affirmative vote of nine members including the concurring votes of the permanent members; provided that, in decisions under Chapter VI, and under paragraph 3 of Article 52, a party to a dispute shall abstain from voting.”Google Scholar

³² Derrida, supra note 2, at 98.Google Scholar

³³ Id. at 99.Google Scholar

³⁴ Brierly, Jamer, The Covenant and the Charter, 23 British Yearbook of International Law (BYIL) 83, 91-2 (1946).Google Scholar

³⁵ Simpson, supra note 7, at 6.Google Scholar

³⁶ Anghie, Antony, On Critique and Other, in International Law and its Others 394 (Anne Orford ed., 2006).Google Scholar

³⁷ Franck, Thomas M., The Power of Legitimacy and the Legitimacy of Power: International Law in an Age of Disequilibrium 100(1) AJIL 88, 97 (2006).Google Scholar

³⁸ According to, inter alia, the Oxford English Dictionary Online, available at: http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/166894?redirectedFrom=rogue%20state#eid25187963 (last accessed: 24 April 2012).Google Scholar

³⁹ National Security Council of USA, National Security Strategy (February 1995).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Boucher, Richard, State Department Daily Press Briefing, Jun. 19, 2000, available at: http://1997-2001.state.gov/www/briefings/0006/000619db.html (last accessed: 24 April 2012).Google Scholar

⁴¹ US NSS 2010, supra note 5, at 2.Google Scholar

⁴² Id. at 12–13.Google Scholar

⁴³ Obama, Barack, Responsibility for our Common Future, address to the UN General Assembly Meeting, 64^th Session, Sept. 23, 2009.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Blair, Tony, Doctrine of the International Community, address to the Economic Club of Chicago, Apr. 24, 1999.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility (2004).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Established under UN Doc. S/Res/1373 (2001).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ UN Doc. S/PV.6390, 6390^th Meeting of the Security Council (2010).Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Derrida, supra note 2, at 64.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ For example, the Millennium Declaration, adopted unanimously by the General Assembly on 8 September 2000, listed the values of Freedom, Equality, Solidarity, Tolerance, Respect for Nature and Shared Responsibility as fundamental values: see UN Doc. A/Res/55/2 (2000).Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Simma, Bruno & Paulus, Andreas L., The ‘International Community': Facing the Challenge of Globalization 9(2) EJIL 266, 268 (1998).Google Scholar

⁵¹ Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argumentation (2005).Google Scholar

⁵² Derrida, supra note 2, at 64.Google Scholar

⁵³ See for example, UN Doc. S/Res/1696 (2006).Google Scholar

⁵⁴ UN Charter art. 2(7).Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Tomuschat, Christian, Obligations Arising for States Without of Against Their Will, 241 Recueil des Cours 194, 342 (1993).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Koskenniemi, supra note 52, at 300.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ For the idea that actors that are excluded because of their deviance are not trusted with their freedom, see Bauman, supra note 6, at 207.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Id. at 206.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ US NSS 2010, supra note 5, at 35.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ US NSS 2002, supra note 4, at 3.Google Scholar

⁶¹ See for example, US NSS 2010, supra note 5, at 5. For the George H. W. Bush position, see National Security Council of USA, National Security Strategy (2006).Google Scholar

⁶² Carr, Edward H., The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (1981).Google Scholar

⁶³ Derrida, supra note 2, at 79–80.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Id. at 79–80.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ It is thought that the Clinton Administration's adoption of “states of concern” rather than rogue states was a response to their negotiating position with respect to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Simpson, supra note 7, at 285.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Id. at 284.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Isolation, in the guise of containment was also used by the Clinton administration; See, for example, National Security Council of USA, National Security Strategy, December 2000; US NSS 1995, supra note 40, at 2.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ UN Charter art. 41.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ UN Charter art. 42.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Frowein, Jochin & Krisch, Nico, Article 42, in The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary 753 (Bruno Simma ed., 2002).Google Scholar

⁷² Barack Obama, Hradcany Square, Prague„ Apr.5 2009, available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-By-President-Barack-Obama-In-Prague-As-Pelivered/(last accessed: 24 April 2012).Google Scholar

⁷³ The UK's permanent representative at the Security Council, Sir Mark Lyall Grant, expressed this rationale in the Security Council meeting at which SCR 1929 (2010) was passed; see UN Doc. S/PV.6335 (2010).Google Scholar

⁷⁴ US Chief of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen has not only said that military actions remain on the table, but also that the military has already made “a plan”; see transcript from “Meet the Press,” MSNBC, Aug. 1, 2010, available at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38487969/ (last accessed: 24 April 2012).Google Scholar

⁷⁵ US NSS 2010, supra note 5, at 11–12.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Bauman, supra note 6, at 206.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ US NSS 2010, supra note 5, at 12.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ See, for example, Cassese, Antonio, International Law in a Divided World (1986).Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Roele, Isobel, Ascertaining Inchoate Threats to International Peace and Security, in International Law in a Multipolar World (Mathew Happold ed., 2011).Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Interestingly the Oxford English Dictionary online edition suggests that the word ‘rogue’ originally meant vagrant or vagabond. These individuals wandered across the country rather than being included in any particular society; see generally, The Oxford English Dictionary, available at: http://www.oed.com/ (last accessed: 24 April 2012).Google Scholar

⁸¹ Derrida, supra note 2.Google Scholar

⁸² Bauman, supra note 6, at 207.Google Scholar

⁸³ Id. at 206.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ International Atomic Energy Agency Doc. GOV/2006/14 (2006).Google Scholar

⁸⁵ UN Doc. S/Res.1696 (2006).Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Bauman, supra note 6, at 206.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Id. at 206.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Id. at 207.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Report of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, supra note 46, at 17.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Derrida, supra note 2, at 79.Google Scholar

⁹¹ Id. at 64.Google Scholar

⁹² Derrida, supra note 2, at 64.Google Scholar

⁹³ UN Doc. A/53/10 (1998); International Law Commission, Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its fiftieth session (1998).Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Phrase attributed to eighteenth century Lord Chancellor of Great Britain, First Baron Thurlow; See, for example, John Coffee, 'No Soul to Damn and No Body to Kick': An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment 79(3) Mich. L. Rev. 386 (1980-1).Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Nuremberg International Military Tribunal, Judgment and Sentences, 41(1) AJIL 172, 221 (1947).Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (BIH v. SRB), 2007 I.C.J. 43, at 172 (Feb. 26, 2007).Google Scholar

⁹⁷ Id. at 170.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ UN Doc. A/53/10 (1998); International Law Commission, supra note 95; Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-third session, Supplement No.10, at 64–77.Google Scholar

⁹⁹ UN Doc. A/31/10 (1976); International Law Commission, Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its twenty-eighth Session (1976); Official Records of the General Assembly, Thirty-first session, Supplement No. 10, at 95–96.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ Id. at 95–96.Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ Derrida, supra note 2.Google Scholar

¹⁰² The ways in which crime can be understood as a public matter are interestingly considered by G. Lamond, What is a Crime?, 27(4) OJLS 609, 614 (2007).Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Sandra E. Marshall and Antony Duff, Criminalization and Sharing Wrongs, 11(1) Can. J. L & Juris. 7, 15 (1998).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ UN Charter art. 24(1).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ Many commentators writing on state crime are careful to note that not all breaches of obligations erga omnes could be considered criminal; see, for example, Geoff Gilbert, The Criminal Responsibility of States, 39(2) ICLQ 345, 355 (1990); James Crawford, First Report, UN Doc. A/53/10 (1998) 69, at 278–279.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (NV v. ES) (New Application: 1962), Second Phase, ICJ Reports, (Feb. 5, 1970), at para. 33.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ UN Doc. A/53/10 (1998); International Law Commission, supra note 95; Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-third session, Supplement No.10, 67 at 265.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ Simma, Bruno, From Bilateralism to Community Interest, 250 Recueil des Cours 217, 306 (1994 VI).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Happold, supra note 31.Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ Fassbender, Bardo, The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community (2009); Nigel White, The Legality of Bombing in the Name of Humanity 5(1) JCSL 27, 28–29 (2000); Christian Tomuschat, Obligations Arising for States Without of Against Their Will, 241 Recueil des Cours 194, 334 (1993 IV).Google Scholar

¹¹¹ And within the SC, the P5; High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, supra note 46.Google Scholar

¹¹² See, for example, Tony Blair in Hansard HC vol. 390 col. 5, Sept. 24, 2002.Google Scholar

¹¹³ Simma, supra note 110, at 309.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ Nuremberg International Military Tribunal, Judgment and Sentences, 41(1) AJIL 172, 186 (1947).Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ Robert Cryer et. al., Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (2010).Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ Resolution RC/Res.6, The Crime of Aggression, Adopted at the 13th plenary meeting, on 11 June 2010, by consensus, article 15.Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ But cf. the “acts of aggression committed by the racist regime of South Africa” against Angola, which were condemned in UN Doc. S/Res/602 (1987).Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ Bauman, supra note 6, at 207.Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Bauman, supra note 6, at 208.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ Simpson, supra note 7, at 284.Google Scholar

¹²¹ Derrida, supra note 2.Google Scholar

¹²² Press release, Briefing by Secretary Clinton, Secretary Gates, Admiral Mullen on the announcement of the new START treaty (Office of the Press Secretary), The White House, Mar. 26, 2010, available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/briefing-secretary-clinton-secretary-gates-admiral-mullen-announcement-new-start-tr (last accessed: 24 April 2012).Google Scholar

¹²³ Press release, Robert Gates, Secretary of Defence Interview With Judy Woodruff, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, Apr. 7, 2009, available at: http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=4397 (last accessed: 24 April 2012).Google Scholar

¹²⁴ Press release, Remarks by the President to CIA Employees (White House, Office of the Press Secretary), CIA Headquarters, Apr. 20, 2009, available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-cia-employees-cia-headquarters (last accessed: 24 April 2012).Google Scholar