¹ Case 26/62, N. V. Algemene Transp. And Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v. Nederslandse administratie der belastingen, 1963 E.C.R. 1, 12.Google Scholar

² Carsten Nowak / Wolfram Cremer (Eds.), Individualrechtsschutz in der EG und der WTO, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2002, p. 5. [Hereinafter “Individualrechtsschutz”]Google Scholar

³ Ibid., p. 7.Google Scholar

⁴ “Individualrechtsschutz gegen Rechtsakte der Gemeinschaft: Grundlagen und neuere Entwicklungen”, (individual legal protection against legal acts of the Community: basic principles and recent developments), Ibid., p. 27ff.Google Scholar

⁵ Ibid., p. 28.Google Scholar

⁶ “Verfahrensrechtlicher und gerichtlicher Individualrechtsschutz im EG-Beihilfekontrollrecht aus der Sicht der Praxis” (procedural and judicial individual legal protection in EC state aid control law from a practice perspective), Ibid., p. 161ff.Google Scholar

⁷ “Der deutsche Individualrechtsschutz im Wandel – Gemeinschaftsrechtliche Vorgaben und Möglichkeiten ihrer Rezeption im Verwaltungsprozeβrecht” (German individual legal protection in flux – Community measures and the possibilities of their adoption in administrative process law), Ibid., p. 81ff.Google Scholar

⁸ “Individualrechtsschutz in Genehmigungsverfahren der Europäischen Gemeinschaft im Recht der Biotechnologie” (individual legal protection in Approval Processes of the European Community in Biotechnology Law), Ibid., p. 103ff.Google Scholar

⁹ Ibid., p. 103.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Ibid., p. 130ff.Google Scholar

¹¹ “Wechselwirkungen zwischen verwaltungsverfahrensrechtlichem und gerichtlichem Individualrechtsschutz in der EG” (interactions between administrative procedural and judicial individual legal protection in the EC), Ibid., p. 135ff.Google Scholar

¹² “Verfahrensrechtlicher und gerichtlicher Individualrechtsschutz im EG-Antidumpingrecht aus der Sicht der Praxis” (procedural and judicial individual legal protection in EC antidumping law from a practice perspective), Ibid., p. 177ff.Google Scholar

¹³ Ibid., p. 136.Google Scholar

¹⁴ or, The private enforcement of WTO law, Ibid., p. 201ff.Google Scholar

¹⁵ or, Is there a deficit of legal protection in the WTO dispute settlement system?, p. Ibid., p. 221ff.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Ibid., p. 220.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Case T-177/01 (Judgment of 3 May 2002) and Case C-50/00 P (Judgment of 25 July 2002), respectively, available at http://curia.eu.int/en/jurisp/index.htm.Google Scholar

¹⁸ See Hanf, Dominik, Facilitating Private Applicants’ Access to the European Courts? On the Possible Impact of the CFI's Ruling in Jégo-Quéré, GLJ Vol. 3 No. 7, 01 July 2002 and, same, Kicking the ball into the Member States’ field: the Court's response to Jégo-Quéré (Case C-50/00 P Unión de Pequenos Agricultores, Judgment of 25 July 2002), GLJ Vol. 3 No. 8, 1 August 2002.Google Scholar