¹ For an overview of the legal instruments, see Alberto de Gregorio Merino, Legal Developments in the Economic and Monetary Union During the Debt Crisis: The Mechanisms of Financial Assistance, 49 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 1613 (2012).Google Scholar

² See Case C-62/14, Gauweiler and Others v. Deutscher Bundestag, ECLI:EU:C:2015:400; Case C-370/12, Pringle v. Government of Ireland, ECLI:EU:C:2012:756.Google Scholar

³ For the German perspective, see Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court], June 21, 2016, Case No. 2 BvR 2728/13 et al., http://www.bverfg.de/e/rs20160621_2bvr272813.html; March 18, 2014, 135 Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts [BVerfGE] 317; Jan. 14, 2014, 134 Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts [BVerfGE] 366; Sept. 12, 2012, 132 Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts [bverfge] 195; June 19, 2012, 131 entscheidungen des bundesverfassungsgerichts [bverfge] 152; Feb. 28, 2012, 130 entscheidungen des bundesverfassungsgerichts [bverfge] 318; Sept. 7, 2011, 129 entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts [BVerfGE] 124.Google Scholar

⁴ See Armin von Bogdandy et al., Verlustrisiko: Griechenlands Schuldenlast kann und muss im Euroraum erleichtert werden, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (July 23, 2015), http://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/staat-und-recht/griechenland-krise-schuldenschnitt-auch-ohne-grexit-moeglich-13715803.html; Armin Steinbach, The “Haircut” of Public Creditors Under EU Law, 12 Eur. Const. L. Rev. 223.Google Scholar

⁵ See Armin von Bogdandy & Matthias Goldmann, Sovereign Debt Restructurings as Exercises of International Public Authority: Towards a Decentralized Sovereign Insolvency Law, in Sovereign Financing and International law: The UNCTAD Principles on Responsible Sovereign Lending and Borrowing 39 (Carlos Espósito et al. eds., 2013).Google Scholar

⁶ Matthias Goldmann & Silvia Steininger, A Discourse Theoretical Approach to Sovereign Debt Restructuring: Towards a Democratic Financial Order, in this issue.Google Scholar

⁷ See generally Luhmann, Niklas, Social Systems (John Bednarz trans., Stanford University Press 1995) (1984).Google Scholar

⁸ See Luhmann, Niklas, Die Weltgesellschaft, 57 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 1 (1971); Niklas Luhmann, A Sociological Theory of law 255–64 (Elizabeth King & Martin Albrow trans., Routledge & Kegan Paul 1985) (1972); Niklas Luhmann, Law as a Social System 479–90 (Ziegert, Klaus A. trans., Oxford University Press 2004) (1993).Google Scholar

⁹ See the contributions in The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation (Kjaer, Poul F. et al. eds., 2011).Google Scholar

¹⁰ See Luhmann, Social Systems, supra note 7, at 12–58.Google Scholar

¹¹ Asa Briggs, The Welfare State in Historical Perspective, 2 Eur. J. Soc. 221 (1961); Niklas Luhmann, Political Theory in the Welfare State (John Bednarz trans., De Gruyter) (1981).Google Scholar

¹² Niklas Luhmann, Der Staat des politischen Systems: Geschichte und Stellung in der Weltgesellschaft, in Perspektiven der Weltgesellschaft 345, 369 (Ulrich Beck ed., 1998) (my translation).Google Scholar

¹³ Niklas Luhmann, Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of the Legal System, 13 Cardozo L. Rev. 1419 (1992).Google Scholar

¹⁴ See Luhmann, Niklas, Verfassung als evolutionäre Errungenschaft, 9 Rechtshistorisches J.176 (1990).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Luhmann, A Sociological Theory of Law, supra note 8, at 259–60.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Jürgen Habermas, Three Normative Models of Democracy, in The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory 239, 251 (Ciaran Cronin trans., Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press 1998) (1996).Google Scholar

¹⁷ Gunther Teubner, Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law, 17 Law & Soc'y Rev. 239, 266 (1983); Helmut Willke, Societal Guidance Through Law?, in State, Law, and Economy as Autopoietic Systems: Regulation and Autonomy in a New Perspective 353, 366 (Gunther Teubner&; Alberto Febbrajo eds., 1992).Google Scholar

¹⁸ Niklas Luhmann, Some Problems with “Reflexive Law,” in State, Law, and Economy as Autopoietic Systems: Regulation and Autonomy in a New Perspective 389, 397 (Gunther Teubner & Alberto Febbrajo eds., 1992).Google Scholar

¹⁹ Gunther Teubner, Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centered Constitutional Theory?, in Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism 3, 15 (Christian Joerges et al. eds., 2004). For more detail, see Teubner, Gunther, Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Gareth Norbury trans., Oxford University Press) (2012).Google Scholar

²⁰ Gunther Teubner, A Constitutional Moment? The Logics of “Hitting the Bottom,” in The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation 3 (Kjaer, Poul F. et al. eds., 2011).Google Scholar

²¹ See Craig, Paul, Economic Governance and the Euro Crisis: Constitutional Architecture and Constitutional Implications, in The Constitutionalization of European Budgetary Constraints 19 (Maurice Adams et al. eds., 2014); Federico Fabbrini, Economic Governance in Europe: Comparative Paradoxes, Constitutional Challenges (2016).Google Scholar

²² Niklas Luhmann, Recht und Automation in der öffentlichen Verwaltung: Eine verwaltungswissenschaftliche untersuchung 36 (1966).Google Scholar

²³ See Treaty Establishing the European Stability Mechanism, Feb. 2, 2012, art. 13(3), http://www.esm.europa.eu/about/legal-documents/ESM%20Treaty.htm [hereinafter ESM].Google Scholar

²⁴ See Memorandum of Understanding Between the European Commission Acting on Behalf of the European Stability Mechanism and the Hellenic Republic and the Bank of Greece, Eur. Comm'n (Aug. 19, 2015), http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/assistance_eu_ms/greek_loan_facility/pdf/01_mou_20150811_en.pdf.Google Scholar

²⁵ See, e.g., Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined 208 (1832). For an overview of the various approaches, see Walz, Gustav Adolf, Wesen des Völkerrechts und Kritik der Völkerrechtsleugner (1930).Google Scholar

²⁶ Louis Henkin, How Nations Behave: law and Foreign Policy 47 (2d ed. 1979).Google Scholar

²⁷ See Overview of Ongoing and Closed Excessive Deficit Procedures, Eur. Comm'n (Sept. 23, 2016), http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/sgp/corrective_arm/index_en.htm.Google Scholar

²⁸ See Karl-Heinz Ladeur, Diesseits der Rechtsgemeinschaft: Die “instituierende Gewalt” der sozialen Regeln und die Grenzen der europäischen Integration, in Europa: Krise, Umbruch und neue Ordnung 139, 148–51 (Stefan Kadelbach & Klaus Günther eds., 2014).Google Scholar

²⁹ Luhmann, Law as a Social System, supra note 8, at 487.Google Scholar

³⁰ Id. at 481. For an illustration regarding the case of Brazil, see Neves, Marcelo, Verfassung und Positivität des Rechts in der peripheren Moderne: Eine theoretische Betrachtung und eine Interpretation des Falls Brasilien (1992).Google Scholar

³¹ See Luhmann, Law as a Social System, supra note 8, at 142–72.Google Scholar

³² Id. at 148.Google Scholar

³³ See Luhmann, A Sociological Theory of Law, supra note 8, at 31–40. For an obnoxious example of the distinction between normative and cognitive expectations, see id. at 33: Suppose, for example, one is waiting for a new secretary. This situation contains both cognitive and normative components of expectation. To be sure, the fact that she could be young, pretty and blonde may be cognitively expected; but in these respects it is necessary to adapt to disappointments, i.e. not to insist on blonde hair, ask for it to be dyed, etc. However, it is normatively expected that she should achieve something.Google Scholar

³⁴ See Luhmann, Weltgesellschaft, supra note 8, at 10–17; Luhmann, A Sociological Theory of Law, supra note 8, at 261–64.Google Scholar

³⁵ Luhmann, A Sociological Theory of Law, supra note 8, at 262.Google Scholar

³⁶ Id. at 261.Google Scholar

³⁷ Christian Joerges, Law and Politics in Europe's Crisis: On the History of the Impact of an Unfortunate Configuration, 21 Constellations 249, 251 (2014).Google Scholar

³⁸ Mareike Kleine, Informal Governance in the European Union: How Governments Make International organizations work (2013).Google Scholar

³⁹ See Tuori, Kaarlo & Tuori, Klaus, The Eurozone Crisis: A Constitutional Analysis (2014); Alicia Hinarejos, The Euro Area Crisis in Constitutional Perspective (2015).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ See Puetter, Uwe, The European Council and the Council: New Intergovernmentalism and Institutional Change (2014); Uwe Puetter, The Eurogroup: How a Secretive Circle of Finance Ministers Shape European Economic Governance (2006).Google Scholar

⁴¹ Bickerton, Christopher J. et al., The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era, 53 J. Common Mkt. Stud. 703 (2015); see also Fabbrini, Sergio, Intergovernmentalism and Its Limits: Assessing the European Union's Answer to the Euro Crisis, 46 Comp. Pol. Stud. 1003 (2013).Google Scholar

⁴² See Dimopoulos, Angelos, The Use of International Law as a Tool for Enhancing Governance in the Eurozone and Its Impact on EU Constitutional Integrity, in The Constitutionalization of European Budgetary Constraints 41 (Maurice Adams et al. eds., 2014); R. Alexander Lorz & Heiko Sauer, Ersatzunionsrecht und Grundgesetz: Verfassungsrechtliche Zustimmungsgrundlagen für den Fiskalpakt, den ESM-Vertrag und die Änderung des AEUV, 65 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 573 (2012).Google Scholar

⁴³ See Treaty Establishing the European Stability Mechanism, Feb. 2, 2012, http://www.esm.europa.eu/about/legal-documents/ESM%20Treaty.htm [hereinafter ESM].Google Scholar

⁴⁴ See Peers, Steve, Towards a New Form of EU Law?: The Use of EU Institutions Outside the EU Legal Framework, 9 Eur. Const. L. Rev. 37 (2013); Andreas Fischer-Lescano & Lukas Oberndorfer, Fiskalvertrag und Unionsrecht: Unionsrechtliche Grenzen völkervertraglicher Fiskalregulierung und Organleihe, 66 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 9 (2013).Google Scholar

⁴⁵ See ESM arts. 13, 37–38.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ See Bauer, Michael W. & Stefan Becker, The Unexpected Winner of the Crisis: The European Commission's Strengthened Role in Economic Governance, 36 J. Eur. Integration 213 (2014); Thomas Beukers, The New ECB and Its Relationship with the Eurozone Member States: Between Central Bank Independence and Central Bank Intervention, 50 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 1579 (2013).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ See ESM art. 13(3).Google Scholar

⁴⁸ See Schwarz, Michael, A Memorandum of Misunderstanding—The Doomed Road of the European Stability Mechanism and a Possible Way Out: Enhanced Cooperation, 51 Common Mkt. L. Rev. 389 (2014); Maria Meng-Papantoni, Legal Aspects of the Memoranda of Understanding in the Greek Debt Crisis, 18 Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien 3 (2015).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ See Bardutzky, Samo & Fahey, Elaine, Who Got to Adjudicate the EU's Financial Crisis and Why? Judicial Review of the Legal Instruments of the Eurozone, in The Constitutionalization of European Budgetary Constraints 341 (Maurice Adams et al. eds., 2014); Alicia Hinarejos, The Role of Courts in the Wake of the Eurozone Crisis, in Beyond the Crisis: The Governance of Europe's Economic, Political, and Legal Transformation 112 (Mark Dawson et al. eds., 2015).Google Scholar

⁵⁰ See cases cited supra notes 2–3.Google Scholar

⁵¹ See, e.g., Case C-226/13, Fahnenbrock and Others v. Hellenic Republic, ECLI:EU:C:2015:383.Google Scholar

⁵² See Karl-Heinz Ladeur, The Postmodern Condition of Law and Societal “Management of Rules”: Facts and Norms Revisited, 27 Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 87 (2006); Thomas Vesting, Rechtstheorie 113–15 (2d ed. 2015).Google Scholar

⁵³ See Beck, Ulrich, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Mark Ritter trans., Sage 1992) (1986); Francois Ewald, L'État providence (1986).Google Scholar

⁵⁴ See Schmitter, Philippe C., Still the Century of Corporatism?, 36 Rev. Pol. 85 (1974); Ernst-Hasso Ritter, Der kooperative Staat: Bemerkungen zum Verhältnis von Staat und Wirtschaft, 104 Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts 389 (1979).Google Scholar

⁵⁵ See ESM art. 13(1).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Id. art. 13(7).Google Scholar

⁵⁷ See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court], Mar. 18, 2014, 135 Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts [BVerfGE] 317, 371.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ See Luhmann, A Sociological Theory of Law, supra note 8, at 262.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Id. Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Id. at 264.Google Scholar

⁶¹ See Financial Assistance Facility Agreement Between European Stability Mechanism and the Hellenic Republic and the Bank of Greece and Hellenic Financial Stability Fund, Eur. Comm'n (Aug. 19, 2015), http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/assistance_eu_ms/greek_loan_facility/index_en.htm.Google Scholar

⁶² Luhmann, A Sociological Theory of Law, supra note 8, at 262.Google Scholar

⁶³ Luhmann, Law as a Social System, supra note 8, at 404.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court], June 21, 2016, Case No. 2 BvR 2728/13 et al., http://www.bverfg.de/e/rs20160621_2bvr272813.html.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court], Jan. 14, 2014, 134 Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts [BVerfGE] 366.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ See, e.g., Avgouleas, Emilios, Governance of Global Financial Markets: The Law, the Economics, the Politics (2012).Google Scholar

⁶⁷ See, e.g., Moloney, Niamh, EU Securities and Financial Markets Regulation (3d ed. 2014).Google Scholar

⁶⁸ See Pistor, Katharina, A Legal Theory of Finance, 41 J. Comp. Econ. 315 (2013).Google Scholar

⁶⁹ See Augsberg, Ino, Some Realism About New Legal Realism: What's New, What's Legal, What's Real?, 28 Leiden J. Int'l L. 457 (2015); see also Economic Methods for Lawyers (Towfigh, Emanuel V. & Niels Petersen eds., 2015).Google Scholar

⁷⁰ See, e.g., Scharpf, Fritz W., Monetary Union, Fiscal Crisis and the Pre-Emption of Democracy, 9 J. Comp. Gov't & Eur. Pol'y 163 (2011); Nicole Scicluna, Politicization Without Democratization: How the Eurozone Crisis Is Transforming EU Law and Politics, 12 Int'l J. Const. L. 545 (2014); Christian Joerges, Europe's Legitimacy in the Crisis, in Beyond the Crisis: The Governance of Europe's Economic, Political, and Legal Transformation 167 (Mark Dawson et al. eds., 2015).Google Scholar

⁷¹ See also Goldmann & Steininger, supra note 6.Google Scholar

⁷² In a different context, see Peters, Anne, The Globalization of State Constitutions, in New Perspectives on the Divide Between National and International Law 251, 273 (Janne Nijman & André Nollkaemper eds., 2007).Google Scholar

⁷³ For a related concept of democracy within the nation-state, see Rosanvallon, Pierre, Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust (Arthur Goldhammer trans., Cambridge University Press 2008) (2006). For some applications to international law, see Krisch, Nico, Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law 264–76 (2010); Isabelle Ley, Opposition in International Law: Alternativity and Revisibility as Elements of a Legitimacy Concept for Public International Law, 28 Leiden J. Int'l L. 717 (2015).Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Karl-Heinz Ladeur, Globalization and the Conversion of Democracy to Polycentric Networks: Can Democracy Survive the End of the Nation-State?, in Public Governance in the Age of Globalization 89, 113 (Karl-Heinz Ladeur ed., 2004).Google Scholar