¹ UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, Statement to conference “Fighting Terrorism for Humanity: A Conference on the Roots of Evil,” 22 Sept. 2003.Google Scholar

² German court clears student of plotting with 9/11 terrorists, The Guardian, 6 Feb. 2004.Google Scholar

³ First and only 9/11 conviction overturned by German court, The Guardian, 5 Mar. 2004;: Retrial ordered in terror case, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung Weekly, 5 Mar. 2004.Google Scholar

⁴ UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, Statement to the 20 January Security Council ministerial meeting on terrorism.Google Scholar

⁵ Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz, Verfassungsschutz gegen Ausländerextremismus 7 (Dec. 2003).Google Scholar

⁶ Rau, Markus, Country Report Germany, Max Planck Society, Conference on Terrorism as a Challenge for National and International Law, 24 Jan. 2003, available at http://edoc.mpil.de/conference-on-terrorism/imdex.cfm, p. 7f.Google Scholar

⁷ Eur. Ct. HR art. 5; Int'l Covenant on Civ Pol. Rts. art. 9.Google Scholar

⁸ Denninger, Erhard, Zur rechtsstaatlichen Problematik des Terrorismusbekämpfungsgesetzes, Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte, at www.institut-fuer-menschenrechte.de/seiten/doku8.htm.Google Scholar

⁹ Donald P. Kommers, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany 38 (Durham and London 1989).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Meyer, Berthold, Im Spannungsfeld von Sicherheit und Freiheit. Staatliche Reaktionen auf den Terrorismus, 1 HSKF Standpunkte, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, No. 1/2002 at 2.Google Scholar

¹¹ Gesetz zur Ergänzung des Ersten Gesetzes zur Reform des Strafrechts, 20 Dec. 1974; Gesetz zur Änderung des Strafgesetzbuches der Strafprozessordnung, des Gerichtsverfassungsgesetzes, der Bundesrechtsanwaltsordnung und des Strafvollzugsgesetzes, 18 Aug. 1976; Gesetz zur Änderung der Strafprozessordnung, 14. Mar. 1978.Google Scholar

¹² Gesetz zur Änderung des Einführungsgesetzes zum Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz, 30. Sep. 1977. This law until today is controversial but was upheld by the Bundesverfassungsgericht. John E. Finn, Constitutions in Crisis: Political Violence and the Rule of Law, 215 (Oxford 1991).Google Scholar

¹³ Lepsius, Oliver, Freiheit, Sicherheit und Terror. Die Rechtslage in Deutschland, Leviathan, Mar. 2004, 1/2004, at 64-88.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Lepsius, , Court overturns much of eavesdropping law, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung Weekly, 5. Mar. 2004.Google Scholar

¹⁵ BverfGE, 1 BvR 2378/98, 03 Mar. 2004.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Terrorismusbekämpfungsgesetz, Begründung, Erster Teil.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Lepsius, , supra note 14, 66ff.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Id. at 65.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Id. at 86ff.Google Scholar

²⁰ Koch, Cordelia, Freiheitsbeschränkung in Raten? Biometrische Merkmale und das Terrorismusbekämpfungsgesetz, HSFK-Report, Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, 5/2002 at 2; Meyer supra note 10, 8.Google Scholar

²¹ A full list of relevant bilateral and multilateral treaties is contained in Germany's first report to the Counter Terrorism Commission (CTC) of 02 Jan. 2002, S/2002/11, Appendix.Google Scholar

²² Delgado v Paez, Report of the Human Rights Committee, Communication No. 195/1985, U.N. GAOR, 45th Sess., Supp. No. 40, Vol. II, at 43, U.N. Doc. A/45/40 (1990).; Kiliç v. Turkey, 33 Eur. H.R. Rep. 58, ¶ 62 (2000).Google Scholar

²³ For a comprehensive compilation of case law on Human Rights and terrorism see UN High Comm. H.R.: Digest of the UN and of Regional Organizations on the Protection of Human Rights While Countering Terrorism, July 2003.Google Scholar

²⁴ First, Second and Third German Reports to the Counter Terrorism Commission (CTC), S/2002/11, S/2002/1193, and S/2003/671.Google Scholar

²⁵ Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights: Terrorism and Human Rights, Progress Report, prepared by Kalliopi K. Koufa, Special Rapporteur, 27 Jun. 2001, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2001/31, ¶ 25.Google Scholar

²⁶ Id. at ¶ 25ff.; International Council on Human Rights Policy, Human Rights after September 11, Versoix 2002, 11ff.Google Scholar

²⁷ Id, at 3. The same concern was raised by Kofi Annan, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, Statement of the Secretary-General to the 58^th Commission on Human Rights, 12 Mar. 2002.Google Scholar

²⁸ Christian Walter, Defining Terrorism in National and International Law, Max Planck Society, Conference on Terrorism as a Challenge for National and International Law, 24 Jan. 2003 at http://edoc.mpil.de/conference-on-terrorism/imdex.cfm, p. 2.Google Scholar

²⁹ Supra note 5, at 12.Google Scholar

³⁰ Id.Google Scholar

³¹ Supra note 24, at 5. Nevertheless, some recent concepts are similarly broad, such as the United Kingdom Terrorism Act and the Canadian Bill.Google Scholar

³² BGH 1992, 518.Google Scholar

³³ Marx, Reinhard, Terrorismusbekämpfungsgesetz, UN High Comm. on Refugees, Berliner Symposium 21f (2002).Google Scholar

³⁴ Heinz-Jürgen Schneider, Der neue Paragraf 129b, 30 Nov. 2001, at http://www.cilip.de/terror/schneider.htm.Google Scholar

³⁵ Supra note 24, at 6f. With respect to the latter, the Eur. Ct. H.R. case Jersild v Denmark, 19 Eur. Ct. H.R. 1 (1995), is relevant.Google Scholar

³⁶ Art.129 Criminal Code.Google Scholar

³⁷ Criminal Procedure Code art.100a, 100c, 103, 111, 112; Contact Ban Law art.31.Google Scholar

³⁸ Supra note 5, at 12f.Google Scholar

³⁹ Sunday Times v United Kingdom, 2 Eur. Ct. H.R. 245 (1979).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Clare Ovey & Robin C.A. White, Jakobs & White: The European Convention on Human Rights, 191f (Oxford 2002).Google Scholar

⁴¹ Kokkinakis v Greece, 260 Eur. Ct. H.R. (Ser. A) at ¶ 52 (1993).Google Scholar

⁴² CR v United Kingdom, Eur. Ct. H.R. (Ser. A) at ¶ 34 (2 Nov. 1995).Google Scholar

⁴³ U.N. HRC, General Comment 16 ¶ 8 (1988).Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Joseph, Sarah et al., The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Materials, and Commentary 353 (New York 2000).Google Scholar

⁴⁵ S/RES/1373 ¶ 6 (2001).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Supra note 20.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Klass and others v Germany, 06 Sep 1978.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Id.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Krieger, Heike, Limitations on Privacy, Freedom of Press, Opinion and Assembly as a Means of Fighting Terrorism, Max Planck Society, Conference on Terrorism as a Challenge for National and International Law, 24 Jan. 2003, at http://edoc.mpil.de/conference-on-terrorism/imdex.cfm, p. 3; Leander v Sweden, 116 Eur. Ct. H.R. (Ser. A) at ¶ 48 (1987); Romania, Rotaru v, Eur. Ct. H.R. at ¶ 43, (4 May 2000).Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Niemitz v Germany, 251-B Eur. Ct. H.R. (Ser. A) at ¶ 29 (1992).Google Scholar

⁵¹ Halford v United Kingdom, Eur. Ct. H.R. at ¶¶ 42-46 (25 Jun. 1997).Google Scholar

⁵² Supra note 43, at ¶ 48.Google Scholar

⁵³ Supra note 40, at 370.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Coeriel and Aurik v Netherlands, ¶ 10 Feb. 1994.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Supra note 40, at 263f; Concluding Comments on Poland, UN doc. CCPR/C/79/Add. 110 (1999); Concluding Comments on Zimbabwe, UN doc. CCPR/C/79/Add. 89 (1998); Concluding Comments on Lesotho, UN doc. CCPR/C/79/Add. 106, ¶ 24 (1999).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Supra note 39, at ¶ 10.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Id. at ¶ 7.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Bygrave, Lee, Data Protection Pursuant to the Right to Privacy in Human Rights Treaties, 6 Int'l J.L. & Info. Tech. 247, 247 (1998).Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Konferenz der Datenschutzbeauftragten September 2003, Konsequenzen aus der Untersuchung des MPI über Überwachung der Telekommunikation, at http//www.datenschutz-berlin.de.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Zypries, , Telefonüberwachung wirksam und maßvoll, at www.beck.de.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Max-Planck-Institute, Rechtswirklichkeit und Effizienz der Überwachung der Telekommunikation nach den §§ 100a, 100b StPO und anderer verdeckter Ermittlungsmaßnahmen 54 (2003).Google Scholar

⁶² Supra note 43, at ¶¶ 50-60.Google Scholar

⁶³ Id, ¶ 17.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Id, ¶¶ 18-25.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Supra note 57.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Supra note 55.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Supra note 57, at 310.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Gesetz zur Änderung des Grundgesetzes, 26 Mar. 1998; Gesetz zur Verbesserung der Bekämpfung der organisierten Kriminalität, 4 May 1998.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ BverfG, 1BvR 2378/98, 3 Mar. 2004. Also, Court overturns much of eavesdropping law, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung Weekly, 5 Mar. 2004.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Art.13(3)-(6) Grundgesetz and art.100-101 Criminal Procedure Act (Annex).Google Scholar

⁷¹ BverfG, 1BvR 2378/98, ¶¶ 103-124.Google Scholar

⁷² Id. ¶¶ 167-197.Google Scholar

⁷³ Id. ¶¶ 227-241.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Id. ¶¶ 228-307.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Federal Constitution Protection Act ¶ 3.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Counter-Terrorism Act art.1(1).Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Counter-Terrorism Act, articles 1(3) and 3.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Malone v UK, 02 Aug. 1984, ¶ 79.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Müller-Heidelberg, Till, Das Terrorismusbekämpfungsgesetz. Ein Erfolg der Terroristen, Zeitschrift für Bürgerrechte und Gesellschaftspolitik, No. 21 (2002).Google Scholar

⁸⁰ International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, Anti-terrorism Measures, Security and Human Rights. Developments in Europe, Central Asia and North America in the Aftermath of September 11 196 (April 2003).Google Scholar

⁸¹ Id. at 117f.Google Scholar

⁸² Supra note 76, at 118.Google Scholar

⁸³ Kleine Anfrage der PDS zur Rasterfahndung, 18 Feb. 2002 Bundestagsdrucksache 14/8257.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Supra note 5, at 33.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Id. at 35.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Chassangnou and others v France, Eur. Ct. H.R. at ¶ 89 (29 Mar. 1999).Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Supra note 40, at 523.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Supra note 5, at. 18f.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Supra note 76, at 74.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ As for example reiterated by the European Court, see United Communist Party v Turkey, 62 Eur. Ct. H.R. 1 at ¶ 44 (1998).Google Scholar

⁹¹ Supra note 36, at 216.Google Scholar

⁹² E.g., U.N. GAOR, Declaration of Human Rights of Individuals who are not Nationals of the Country in which They Live, A/RES/40/144 (1985); IHF 2003, at 74f.Google Scholar

⁹³ U.N. HRC, General Comment 15.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Supra note 5, at 19.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Annual Report of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution 2002, at 148, 165, 168f.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Aliens Act art.47(2); Counter-terrorism Law art.11(8).Google Scholar

⁹⁷ U.N. HCR, Stellungnahme zur Anhörung des Terrorismusbekämpfungsgesetzes, 30 Nov. 2001.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Supra note 29, at 19-23.Google Scholar

⁹⁹ International Helsinki Federation, Statements at the OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting, 9, at 44, 19 Sep. 2002.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ Soering v UK, 11 Eur. Ct. H.R. 439 (1989).Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ Chahal v UK, 23 Eur. Ct. H.R. 412 (1996); Ahmed v Austria, 24 Eur. Ct. H.R. 278 (1996), Jabari v Turkey, Eur. Ct. H.R. (11 July 2000).Google Scholar

¹⁰² Erika Feller, et al. ed., Refugee Protection in International Law: U.N. HCR Global Consultations on International Protection, Summary Conclusions: The Principle of non-refoulement 178 (Cambridge 2003).Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Supra note 76, at 170f.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Supra note 93.Google Scholar