Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T02:33:44.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deconstruction is Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Elisabeth Weber

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This provocative assertion, sharply contrasting with the decades-old criticism of deconstruction as an aesthetisizing apolitical and ahistorical exercise, recapitulated in 1989 the stakes of an infinite task and responsibility that, in spite of and because of its infinity, cannot be relegated to tomorrow: “[…] justice, however unpresentable it may be, doesn't wait. It is that which must not wait.” It is in the spirit of such urgency, of a responsibility that cannot be postponed, that Jacques Derrida was an active and outspoken critic and commentator on issues such as South Africa's Apartheid, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the bloody civil war in his native Algeria, human rights abuses, French immigration laws, the death penalty, and on what Richard Falk has termed “the great terror war”.

Type
Articles: Special Issue: A Dedication to Jacques Derrida – Justice
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 6 , Issue 1: Articles: Special issue - A Dedication to Jacques Derrida , 01 January 2005 , pp. 179 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

1 Derrida, Jacques, Force of Law, (translated by Mary Quaintance), 11 Cardozo L. Rev. 920, 967 (1990).Google Scholar

2 Richard Falk, The Great Terror War (2002).Google Scholar

3 Annette Wieviorka, L'Ère du temoin (1998).Google Scholar

4 Derrida, supra note 1 at 947.Google Scholar

5 Id. at 947.Google Scholar

6 Id. at 949.Google Scholar

7 Menke, Christoph, Für eine Politik der Dekonstruktion, in Gewalt und Gerechtigkeit 286 (Anselm Haverkamp ed., 1994).Google Scholar

8 Derrida, supra note 1 at 1042.Google Scholar

9 Id.Google Scholar

10 On the concept of the “bare life,” see Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer. Sovereignty and the Bare Life (1998).Google Scholar

11 Eric Santner, On the Psychotheology of Everyday Life (2001), at 9.Google Scholar

12 Derrida, supra note 1 at 973.Google Scholar

13 Haverkamp, Anselm, Kritik der Gewalt und die Möglichkeit von Gerechtigkeit: Benjamin in Deconstruction, in Gewalt und Gerechtigkeit 7 (Anselm Haverkamp ed. 1994).Google Scholar

14 Derrida, Jacques, Spectres de Marx 279 (1993).Google Scholar

15 Morrison, Toni, Beloved 274 (1998).Google Scholar

16 Id. at 274- 275. See Derrida, supra note 14 at 165 (“The specter, as its name indicates, is the frequency of a certain visibility. But the visibility of the invisible. And visibility, by essence, is not seen, which is why it remains epekeina tes ousias, beyond the phenomenon or being.”).Google Scholar

17 Derrida, Jacques, Faith and Knowledge, in Religion 52 (J. Derrida and G. Vattimo eds., 1998).Google Scholar

18 Derrida, Jacques, Autoimmunity: Real and Symbolic Suicides, in Philosophy in aTime of Terror 105-6 (Giovanna Borradori ed., 2003).Google Scholar

19 Id. at 126 (translation slightly modified).Google Scholar