1 See Tamás Győrfi, In Search of a First-person Plural, Second-best Theory of Constitutional Interpretation, 14 German L.J. 1077 (2013).; Adrian Vermeule, Judging Under Uncertainty (2006).Google Scholar

2 See Ronald Dworkin, Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (1996) [hereinafter Freedom's law]. On the distinction between process-related and outcome-related considerations, see Jeremy Waldron, The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review, 115 Yale L.J. 1346, 1406 (2006).Google Scholar

3 See Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1080.Google Scholar

4 See id. Google Scholar

5 See Robert Bork, The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law 146 (1990); Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1079.Google Scholar

6 Dworkin, , Freedom's Law, supra note 2, at 7.Google Scholar

7 See Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1078.Google Scholar

8 Id. at 1080.Google Scholar

9 Id. at 1082.Google Scholar

10 Id. Google Scholar

11 Id. Google Scholar

12 Id. Google Scholar

13 Id. at 1084.Google Scholar

14 Id. at 1085.Google Scholar

15 See Thayer, James B., The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law, 7 Harv. L. Rev. 129 (1893).Google Scholar

16 Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1084.Google Scholar

17 Id. at 1085.Google Scholar

18 Id. at 1086.Google Scholar

19 Id. at 1085.Google Scholar

20 Dworkin, , Freedom's Law, supra note 2, at 34.Google Scholar

21 Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1083.Google Scholar

22 Vermeule, , supra note 1, at 2.Google Scholar

23 Id. at 71.Google Scholar

24 Id. at 13.Google Scholar

25 Id. at 81.Google Scholar

26 Id. at 13.Google Scholar

27 Id. at 85.Google Scholar

28 Id. at 27.Google Scholar

29 Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1102.Google Scholar

30 Vermeule, , supra note 1, at 81.Google Scholar

31 Id. at 82.Google Scholar

32 Sunstein, Cass R., Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do 50–51 (2002).Google Scholar

33 Id. at 51.Google Scholar

34 Vermeule, , supra note 1, at 82–83.Google Scholar

35 Id. at 83.Google Scholar

36 Id. at 63.Google Scholar

37 Id. at 84.Google Scholar

38 Id. at 85.Google Scholar

39 Sunstein, Cass & Vermeule, Adrian, Interpretation and Institutions, 101 Mich. L. Rev. 885, 951 (2003).Google Scholar

40 Id. at 917.Google Scholar

41 Id. at 918.Google Scholar

42 Id. at 918–19.Google Scholar

43 Vermeule, , supra note 1, at 1.Google Scholar

44 Id. at 33.Google Scholar

45 Vermeule, Adrian, Law and the Limits of Reason 11–12, 90 (2009).Google Scholar

46 Id. at 187.Google Scholar

47 Dworkin, , Freedom's Law, supra note 2 at 7.Google Scholar

48 Vermeule, , supra note 45, at 90.Google Scholar

49 Id. at 11.Google Scholar

50 Id. Google Scholar

51 Id. Google Scholar

52 Id. at 11–12, 90.Google Scholar

53 See Vermeule, , supra note 1.Google Scholar

54 Id. at 111.Google Scholar

55 Vermeule, , supra note 45 at 11.Google Scholar

56 Id. at 90.Google Scholar

57 Id. at 12.Google Scholar

58 See Sunstein, & Vermeule, , supra note 39, at 925–32.Google Scholar

59 Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1089.Google Scholar

60 Vermeule, , supra note 1, at 2.Google Scholar

61 Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1089.Google Scholar

62 Id. at 1090.Google Scholar

63 Vermeule, , supra note 1, at 3.Google Scholar

64 Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1090.Google Scholar

65 Vermeule, , supra note 1, at 33.Google Scholar

66 Id. at 33.Google Scholar

67 See John Rawls, A Theory of Justice 171–227 (rev. ed. 1999).Google Scholar

68 See Ronald Dworkin, Law's Empire 195–206 (1986) [hereinafter Law's Empire].Google Scholar

69 Id. at 199–200.Google Scholar

70 Id. at 218.Google Scholar

71 Id. at 222–23.Google Scholar

72 Dworkin, , Freedom's Law, supra note 2, at 7–8.Google Scholar

73 See Ely, John Hart, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (1980).Google Scholar

74 See Shapiro, Scott J., Legality 213 (2011).Google Scholar

75 Id. at 149.Google Scholar

76 Id. at 120.Google Scholar

77 Bustamante, Thomas, Legality, by Scott Shapiro, 32 Legal Stud. 499, 501, 506 (2012) (book review).Google Scholar

78 See Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method (Joel Weinsheimer & Donald G. Marshall trans., 1989).Google Scholar

79 Dworkin, , Freedom's Law, supra note 2, at 2.Google Scholar

80 Id. at 34.Google Scholar

81 See in particular the theory of interpretation developed in Dworkin, Freedom's Law, supra note 2 and Dworkin, Law's Empire, supra note 68.Google Scholar

82 See Dworkin, , Freedom's Law, supra note 2, at 344.Google Scholar

83 See Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously 82 (5th prtg. 1978).Google Scholar

84 Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle 69 (1985) [hereinafter A Matter of Principle].Google Scholar

85 Dworkin, , Freedom's Law, supra note 2, at 30.Google Scholar

86 Dworkin, , A Matter of Principle, supra note 84, at 70.Google Scholar

87 Dworkin, , Freedom's Law, supra note 2, at 344.Google Scholar

88 Dworkin, , Law's Empire, supra note 68, at 13.Google Scholar

89 Maccormick, Neil, Rhetoric and the Rule of Law 17 (2005).Google Scholar

90 Vermeule, , supra note 1, at 16.Google Scholar

91 Id. at 3.Google Scholar

92 Id. at 84.Google Scholar

93 Dworkin, , Freedom's Law, supra note 2, at 16.Google Scholar

94 Vermeule, , supra note 1, at 80.Google Scholar

95 Id. at 52–59, 71–72, 83–85.Google Scholar

96 Id. at 6–7.Google Scholar

97 Posner, Richard A., Law, Pragmatism and Democracy 49–50 (2003).Google Scholar

98 Dworkin, Ronald, Justice in Robes 60 (2006) [hereinafter Justice in Robes].Google Scholar

99 Id. at 73.Google Scholar

100 Id. at 91.Google Scholar

101 Vermeule, , supra note 1, at 72.Google Scholar

102 Id. at 71Google Scholar

103 Id. at 85Google Scholar

104 Dworkin, , Justice in Robes, supra note 97, at 73.Google Scholar

105 Id. at 70.Google Scholar

106 See Posner, Richard A., The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 1638, 1639 (1998).Google Scholar

107 Waldron, , supra note 2 at 1372–73.Google Scholar

108 Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1104.Google Scholar

109 Id. Google Scholar

110 Id. Google Scholar

111 Id. Google Scholar

112 Id. at 1105.Google Scholar

113 Dworkin, , Law's Empire, supra note 68, at 71.Google Scholar

114 See Dworkin, , Freedom's Law, supra note 2, at 24.Google Scholar

115 Waldron, Jeremy, Law and Disagreement 102 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

116 Id. at 114.Google Scholar

117 Gyorfi, , supra note 1, at 1105.Google Scholar

118 Id. Google Scholar

119 Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1105 (quoting Gerald Gaus, Contemporary Liberalism: Public Reason as a Post-Enlightenment Project 214 (2003)).Google Scholar

120 Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1105Google Scholar

121 Id. at 1106.Google Scholar

122 Id. Google Scholar

123 Id. Google Scholar

124 See Joseph, Raz, Ethics in the Public Domain 206 (1994).Google Scholar

125 See Shapiro, , supra note 74, at 234–58.Google Scholar

126 See Dworkin, , Justice in Robes, supra note 97, at 51.Google Scholar

127 Waldron, Jeremy, Judges as Moral Reasoners, 7 Int'l J. Const. L. 2, 12 (2009). It must be stressed, however, that Waldron does not believe that this approach to legal interpretation should be adopted.Google Scholar

128 Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1085.Google Scholar

129 Dworkin, , Freedom's Law, supra note 2, at 11.Google Scholar

130 Id. at 19–26.Google Scholar

131 Id. at 22.Google Scholar

132 Id. at 24.Google Scholar

133 Dworkin, , A Matter of Principle, supra note 84, at 60.Google Scholar

134 Id. at 58.Google Scholar

135 Id. at 66.Google Scholar

136 Id. at 66–67.Google Scholar

137 See Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1087.Google Scholar

138 See Sunstein, & Vermeule, , supra note 34, at 914.Google Scholar

139 For some of these considerations, see Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1087 ff.Google Scholar

140 See Győrfi, supra note 1, at 1087 and 1094.Google Scholar

141 Id., 1106.Google Scholar

142 See id., 1104.Google Scholar

143 Dworkin, Ronald, Justice for Hedgehogs 2 (2011).Google Scholar

144 Id. at 5.Google Scholar

145 Alexy, Robert, Balancing, Constitutional Review, and Representation, 3 Int'l J. Const. L. 572, 579 (2005).Google Scholar

146 Id. at 578.Google Scholar

147 Id. at 579.Google Scholar

148 Id. Google Scholar

149 Id. Google Scholar