Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T09:10:55.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anything Goes in Private Law Theory? On the Epistemic and Ontological Commitments of Private Law Multi-Pluralism – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2022

Martijn W. Hesselink

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

Pluralismlegal epistemologylegal ontologyskepticismdemocratic private law
Type
Erratum
Information
German Law Journal , Volume 23 , Issue 8 , October 2022 , pp. 1158
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the German Law Journal

During the editing process, the title of the article was inadvertently changed to include an additional ‘and’ without the author’s knowledge. On initial publication, the article bore this incorrect title “Anything Goes in Private Law Theory? On the Epistemic and Ontological Commitments of Private Law and Multi-Pluralism”.

This article has now been updated with the intended title “Anything Goes in Private Law Theory? On the Epistemic and Ontological Commitments of Private Law Multi-Pluralism”. We apologise to the author for the error and issue this erratum for the sake of transparency in the scholarly record.

Footnotes

*

The online version of this article has been updated since original publication. A notice detailing the change has also been published

References

Hesselink, M. (2022). Anything Goes in Private Law Theory? On the Epistemic and Ontological Commitments of Private Law Multi-Pluralism. German Law Journal, 23(6), 891–899. doi: 10.1017/glj.2022.52 Google Scholar