Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:22:34.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X.—On the Sequence of the Inferior Oolite Deposits at Bredon Hill, Worcestershire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

The correct sequence of the Inferior Oolite deposits at this locality has always been a matter of uncertainty. This is due partly to the disturbed state of the oolite, partly to the scarcity of fossils. On Bredon Hill only the four lowest subdivisions of the Inferior Oolite series are preserved. In the Cotteswold Hills around Cheltenham they are, in descending order, the Lower Freestone, Pea - grit, Lower Limestone, and sandy beds characterized by a very distinctive ammonite, Tmetoceras scissum — the last being the sandy ferruginous limestones of Witchell. Professor Hull did not recognize the Pea-grit at Bredon, but stated that its most northern extension was at Notting Hill. In 1863, however, Dr. Holl rectified this error, and remarked that its non-existence here was only true as regards its pisolitic structure. Above Elmley Lodge that author noticed masses of limestone crowded with fragments of the spines and plates of Echinoderms, as well as numerous specimens of Bryozoa, and Terebratula plicata. Below the brow of the eastern extremity of the hill, above Ashton-under-Hill, Dr. Holl obtained Rhynchonella cynocephala in blocks of hard limestone, but was unable to find the bed in sitû or to offer any suggestion as to its probable stratigraphical position.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1902

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 513 note 1 Mem. Geol. Surv.: “Geology of the Country around Cheltenham” (1857), p. 33. Notting Hill is locally known as Nottingham Hill.Google Scholar

page 513 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xix (1863), p. 315.Google Scholar