^{page 24 note 2} A History of the Fossil Insects in the Secondary Rocks of England, 1845, pp. 73–9; Trans. Woolhope Nat. F.C., vol. for 1866 (1867), pp. 205–15, etc.Google Scholar

^{page 24 note 3} Quart Journ. Geol. Soc, vol. xlii, pp. 272–5, 1886.Google Scholar

^{page 24 note 4} Ibid, vol. xxx, pp. 746–8, 1874.

^{page 24 note 5} Ibid, vol. xxi, pp. 159–61, 1865.

^{page 24 note 6} Ibid, pp. 160–1.

^{page 24 note 7} The Jurassic Bocks of Britain—The Lias of England and Wales (Yorkshire excepted), vol. iii, pp. 151, 159, 160, 1893: Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar

^{page 24 note} Ibid, pp. 151, 162, 163: Explanation, Hor. Sect., Sheet 140, p. 9.

^{page 24 note 9} Q.J.G.S., vol. xxxiv, pp. 179 et seqq., 1878; vol. xl, pp. 353–75, 1884.Google Scholar

^{page 24 note 10} Geology of Warwickshire Coal-field, 1859, p. 45.Google Scholar

^{page 24 note 11} Q.J.G.S., vol. xvi, pp. 394, 395,1860; Pal. Soc, Monogr. Lias Amm. Brit. Isles, pt. i, pp. 19–21, 1878.Google Scholar

^{page 24 note 12} Anactive local geologist who furnished several authors with valuable information.

^{page 24 note 12} Proc Warwick, . Nat. and Arch. F.C., 51st Ann. Rep., 1906, pp. 20–7.Google Scholar

^{page 25 note 1} The Jurassic Rocks of Britain—The Lias, etc., p. 151.Google Scholar

^{page 26 note 1} Q.J.G.S., vol. xxi, p. 160, 1865.Google Scholar

^{page 27 note 1} The Geology of England and Wales, 1887, p. 247.Google Scholar

^{page 27 note 2} Brodie states (Trans. Woolhope Nat. F.C., vol. for 1866, p. 212Google Scholar) that it is worthy of note that in one of the more westerly sections at Wilmcote “all the insect beds thin out and scarcely amount to three layers, the top band being irregular and shattered; a thick mass of shale succeeds, undivided, as elsewhere, by limestones, and below are three beds of limestone, viz., the firestone, with Ostrea liassica, but of a very different character”. From Brodie's record of the Wilmcote section (loc. cit. supra, pp. 210–11)Google Scholar it is clear that the limestones in which he found insect-remains most abundantly came above the deposits in which saurian-remains are commonest, and are clearly of planorbis date.

^{page 27 note 3} Brodie complains that his name of “Insect Beds” was ignored by Wright, who applied the term “Saurian Beds” to them (Trans. Woolhope, Nat. F.C., vol. for 1866 (1867), p. 210).Google Scholar

^{page 28 note 1} L. R., Proc. Cotteswold Nat. F.C., vol. xv, pt. i, p. 41, 1904; Trans. Worcestershire Nat. Club, vol. iii, p. 101.Google Scholar

^{page 28 note 2} Q.J.G.S., vol. xlii, pp. 272–3, 1886.Google Scholar

^{page 28 note 3} Amongst them Ophiolepis damesi. Examples of Isocyprina spp., Pteria contorta, Natica oppeli, etc., in black shale from here are exhibited in the Warwick Museum.

^{page 28 note 4} Q.J.G.S., vol. xxi, p. 160, 1865.Google Scholar

^{page 28 note 5} Ibid, p. 160.

^{page 28 note 6} Ibid, vol. xxx, pp. 748–9, 1874

^{page 29 note 1} Memoirs of H. E. Strickland, by Sir Jardine, William, 1858, p. 117.Google Scholar

^{page 29 note 2} Q.J.G.S., vol. xxi, pp. 159–60, 1865; Rep. Brit. Assoc, 1864, p. 52.Google Scholar

^{page 29 note 3} Ibid, p. 748; csee also The Jurassic Bocks of Britain—The Lias, etc., p. 153.Google Scholar

^{page 29 note 4} Wright, , Q.J.G.S., vol. xvi, pp. 385–7, 1860.Google Scholar

^{page 30 note 1} Q.J.G.S., vol. xvi, pp. 394–5, 1860.Google Scholar

^{page 30 note 2} Pal Soc, Monogr. Lias Amm. Brit. Isles, pt. i, pp. 19–21, 1878Google Scholar; see also Phillips, , Geology of Oxford, pp. 111–12.Google Scholar

^{page 30 note 3} Q.J.G.S., vol. xxxiv, pp. 181–2,1878.Google Scholar Strickland discovered the Bone-Bed in situ at Temple Grafton (Brodie, , Fossil Insects, p. 73).Google Scholar

^{page 30 note 4} Ibid, vol. xlii, pp. 273–4, 1886.

^{page 30 note 5} Discussion ibid., pp. 274–5.

^{page 32 note 1} The Jurassic Rocks of Britain—The Lias, etc., vol. iii, p. 159, 1893.Google Scholar

^{page 32 note 2} Q.J.G.S., vol. xl, p. 364, 1884.Google Scholar

^{page 33 note 3} Oldham, T. B., Report Rugby Sch. Nat. Hist. Soc, 1879, p. 11.Google Scholar

^{page 32 note 4} Q.J.G.S., vol. lviii, pp. 720–1, 1902.Google Scholar

^{page 32 note 5} In some of the indurated shales Ostracoda are very abundant, together with specimens of Pseudomonotis papyria (Qu.), and indicate precisely the same horizon as at Maisemore, near Gloucester (Proc. Cotteswold Nat. F.C., vol. xv, pp. 256–62).Google Scholar

^{page 33 note 1} The Jurassic Rocks of Britain—The Lias, etc., pp. 151, 162Google Scholar.

^{page 33 note 2} Horizontal Section (Geol. Surv.), Sheet 140, and Explanation, 1891, p. 10Google Scholar.

^{page 33 note 3} Report Eugby Seh. Nat. Hist. Soc, 1868, pp. 41–2 and plateGoogle Scholar.

^{page 33 note 4} The Jurassic Rocks of Britain—The Lias, etc., p. 165Google Scholar.

⁵ Cleminshaw, E., Report Eugby Sen. Nat. Hist. Soc, 1867, p. 32Google Scholar; ibid., 1868, p. 43; T. B. Oldham & G. Jones, ibid., 1877, p. 48; T. B. Oldham, ibid., pp. 49–54.