Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T19:30:34.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Permian foraminifera from north-western England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. Pattison
J. Pattison
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, Ring Road Halton, Leeds, 15.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Eight species of foraminifera from the Manchester Marl are described and foraminifera recently discovered in the Magnesian Limestone of both the West Cumberland and the Eden Valley areas are also mentioned. All the described forms are similar to, and some are possibly conspecific with, foraminifera previously recorded from the Lower Magnesian Limestone of north-eastern England or Zechstein 1 of north-western Germany.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 106 , Issue 2 , 20 April 1969 , pp. 197 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, F. W. 1964. Aschemonella longicaudata sp. nov. from the Permian of Derbyshire, England. Geol. Mag., 101, 44–7.Google Scholar
Burgess, I. C. 1965. The Permo-Triassic rocks around Kirkby Stephen, Westmorland. Proc. Yorks. geol. Soc., 35, 91–101.Google Scholar
Cummings, R. H. 1955. Nodosinella Brady, 1876, and associated Upper Palaeozoic genera. Micropalaeontology, 1, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howchin, W. 1895. Carboniferous Foraminifera of Western Australia, with descriptions of new species. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 19, 194–8.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. & Tappan, Helen 1964. In Moore, R. C. (Ed.). Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part (C) Protista 2.Google Scholar
Paalzow, R. 1935. Die Foraminiferen im Zechstein des östlichen Thüringen. Jb.preitss. geol. Landesanst., 56, 26–45.Google Scholar
Roeder, C. 1890. Description of fossils found in the Permian upper series, at Fallowfield. Trans. Manchr geol Soc., 21, 13–6.Google Scholar
Scherp, H. 1962. Foraminiferen aus dem unteren und mittleren Zechstein Nordwestdeutschlands, insbesondere der Bohrung Friedrich Heinrich 57 bei Kamp-Lintfort. Fortschr. Geol. Rheinld Westf., 6, 265–330.Google Scholar
Schmid, E. E. 1867. Über die kleineren organischen Formen des Zechsteinkalks von Sellers in der Wetterau. Neues Jb. Miner. Ceol. Paläont., 576–588.Google Scholar
Spandel, E. 1898. Die Foraminiferen des deutschen Zechsteines. Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Vanoerow, E. F. 1962. Über Ammodiscus aus dem Zechstein. Palaont. Z., 36, 125–133.Google Scholar