Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T07:31:46.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problems of Ammonite Nomenclature. 4. The Vicissitudes of the Genus Rhacophyllites, Zittel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

L. F. Spath
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It seems late in the day to ask the International Commission to standardize the use of Rhacophyllites in the interpretation commonly accepted for over half a century, but until I discussed this genus last summer with Dr. S. W. Muller, Stanford University, California, in connection with work on Lias ammonites, I was unaware that it offered a nomenclatorial problem or that this was incapable of a simple solution on the basis of the existing rules of nomenclature. A discussion of the difficulties encountered may not be out of place in this series, and I hope to show that this is indeed one of the special cases in which standardization provides the only fair solution.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , February 1939 , pp. 77 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 77 note 1 Handbuch der Palæontologie, i, 2, Lief. 3, p. 439.Google Scholar

page 77 note 2 Les Ammonites jurassiques et crétacées, Paris, 1938, p. 10.Google Scholar

page 77 note 3 “Cephalopoden der mediterranen Triasprovinz”, Abh. k.k. geol. Reichsanst., vol. x, p. 161.Google Scholar

page 77 note 4 “Über die liasischen Cephalopoden des Hierlatz bei Hallstatt”, Abh. k.k. geol. Reichsanst., xii, 223Google Scholar; also “Die mittelliasische Cepbalopoden-Fauna des Hinter-Schafberges, etc.”, Abh. k.k. geol. Reichsanst., xv, 48, etc.Google Scholar

page 77 note 5 “Beiträge zu einer Revision der Ammoniten des schwäbischen Jura. I, 1 (Phylloceras)”, Jahresh. Ver. vaterl. Naturk. W¨rtt., xlix, 7 (1893).Google Scholar Also “Palæontologiscbe Beziehungen zwischen den untersten Lias-Zonen der Alpen und Schwabens”, Jahresh. Ver. vaterl. Naturk. W¨rtt., p. xlv (1893)Google Scholar; and “Ammoniten des Rhät”, N. Jb. f. Min. etc., ii, 39 (1895).Google Scholar

page 78 note 1 “Beiträge zur Kenntniss der obertriadischen Cephalopoden-Faunen des Himalaya”, Denkschr. k. Akad. Wiss. Wien, lxiii, 667Google Scholar; also “Upper Triaasic Cephalopoda Faunae of the Himalaya”, Pal. Indica, ser. xv, iii, pt. 1, 1899, 115.Google Scholar

page 78 note 2 “Sur la faune du Callovien inférieur (Chanasien) de Savoie”, Mém. Acad. Savoie, sér. iv, vi, 1895, 87.Google Scholar

page 78 note 3 C.R. Congrès géol. internat. (2) Bologna, 1881 (1882), p. 595.Google Scholar

page 78 note 4 See Smithsonian Inst. Publ. 1938, 07, 1910, p. 1Google Scholar; and Geol. Surv. Kwang-tung and Kwansi, spec, publ., no. xii (1932), p. 1.Google Scholar

page 78 note 5 Das Gebirge um Hallstatt. Abt. I. Die Cephalopoden der Hallstätter Kalke. Suppl. Heft to vol. i, Abh. k.k. Reichsanst. (1902), p. 317.Google Scholar

page 79 note 1 “Upper Triassic and Liassic Faunae of the Exotic Blocks of Malla Johar, etc.”, Pal. Indica, ser. xv, i, pt. 1, 21.Google Scholar

page 79 note 2 Fossilium Catalogus, i, pt. 56.Google Scholar

page 79 note 3 In Gürich: Leitfossilien. Pt. iv. Wirbellose der Trias, etc., p. 74.Google Scholar

page 79 note 4 Éitude sur les Phylloceras jurassiques et crétacés”, C.R. somm. Soc. géol. France, nos. 12–13 (1911), pp. 129–131.Google Scholar

page 79 note 5 “Die Fauna des mittlereu Lias von Ballino in Südtirol”, Beitr. Pal. Geol. Östrr.-Ung., xxvi, 88.Google Scholar

page 79 note 6 “The Development of Tragophylloceras loscombi (J. Sowerby)”, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxx, 1914, 355.Google Scholar

page 80 note 1 “Ammonites from New Zealand”, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxix, 1923, 291Google Scholar. Also “Revision of the Jurassic Cephalopod Fauna of Kachh (Cutch)”, Pal. Indica, n.s., ix, no. 2, pt. 1, 38 (1927).Google Scholar

page 80 note 2 “Upper Triassic Marine Invertebrate Faunas of North America”, U.S. Geol. Sun. Prof. Paper 141, 1927, 99.Google Scholar

page 80 note 3 “Ammonoidea leiostraca aus der oberen Trias von Timor”, Jaarb. v.h. Mijnwezen in Ned. Indie, lv, 1926, Verh., 139 (1928).Google Scholar

page 80 note 4 “Neue Ammonoidea leiostraca aus den Hallstätter Kalken des Salz-kammergutes”, Denkschr. k. Akad. Wiss., Wien, xcvii, 1921, 375, etc.Google Scholar

page 81 note 1 See in Herbich, , “Das Szeklerland, etc.”, Mitteil. Jahrb. k. ungar. geol. Anst., vol. v, Heft 2, 1878, p. 114, pl. xxj,Google Scholar fig. 1 (lectotype in Uhlig, but very defective and restored with plaster, according to Vadasz, Ibid., vol. xvi, Heft 5, 1908, p. 324). The description is based on the original of Herbich's plate xxh, fig. 2.