Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T17:27:14.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ordovician fauna from the Contaya Formation of eastern Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

C. P. Hughes ,
R. B. Rickards  and
A. Williams
C. P. Hughes
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Sedgwick Museum, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, U.K.
R. B. Rickards
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Sedgwick Museum, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, U.K.
A. Williams
Affiliation:
The University, Glasgow, G12 8QQU.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The Ordovician Fauna from the Contaya Formation from the lowlands of eastern Peru is fully described for the first time. The fauna is restricted and consists essentially of brachiopods, trilobites and Graptolites and three new species, the brachiopod Tissintia simplex, and the trilobites Anebolithus tafuri and Porterfieldia contayaensis are described. The fauna is shown to have close affinities with those of central Europe and North Africa.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 117 , Issue 1 , January 1980 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellido, E. 1969. Sinopsis de le Geologia del Perú. Boln. Serv. geol. miner. Peru. 22, 5–54.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. J. & Mégard, F. 1972. Silurian of Peru. In Correlation of the South American Silurian rocks (ed. Berry, W. B. N. & Boucot, A. J.). Spec. Pap. Geol. Soc. Am. 133, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brongniart, A. & Desmarest, A. G. 1822. Histoire Naturelle des Crustacés fossiles; sous les rapports zoologiques et géologiques, savoir les trilobites. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulman, O. M. B. 1931. South American graptolites with special reference to the Nordenskiöld collection. Arkiv. Zool. 22A, 1–111.Google Scholar
Bulman, O. M. B. 1933. Report on the graptolites from the Quitari area. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 89, 348–53, 355–6.Google Scholar
Cobbing, E. J. 1972. Tectonic elements of Peru and the evolution of the Andes. Proc. 24th Int. geol. Congr. sect. 3, Tectonics, pp. 306–15.Google Scholar
Cook, H. E. & Taylor, M. E. 1975. Early Paleozoic continental margin sedimentation, trilobite biofacies, and the thermocline, western United States. Geology 3, 559–62.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, B. N. 1953. Trilobites from the lower Champlainian Formations of the Appalachian Valley. Mem. geol. Soc. Am. 55, 1–69.Google Scholar
Crosfield, M. C. & Skeat, E. G. 1896. On the geology of the neighbourhood of Carmarthen. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 52, 523–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalmayrac, B. 1970. Mise en évidence d'une chaîne anté–ordovicienne et probablement précambrienne dans la Cordillère Orientale du Pérou Central (région de Huanuco). C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris. ser. D. 270, 1088–91.Google Scholar
Dalmayrac, B. 1977. Géologie des Andes Perouviennes. Géologie de la Cordillère orientale de la region de Huanuco; sa place dans une transversale des Andes du Pérou central (9° S, 10° 30' S). Thèse Doct. Sci. Nat. Monpellier.Google Scholar
Dalmayrac, B., Laubacher, G. & Marocco, R. 1977. Géologie des Andes Peruviennes. Charactères généraux de l'évolution géologique des Andes Perouviennes. Thèse Doct. Sci. Nat. Monpellier.Google Scholar
Dávila, J. & Ponce de León, V. 1971. La sección del rió Inambari en la faja subandia del Perú y la presencia desedimentitas de la Formación Cancañiri (Zapla) del Silurico. Rev. Tec. Yac. Petrol. Fisc. Boliv. 1, 67–85.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1975. Cambrian and Ordovician correlation and trilobite distribution in Turkey. Fossils & Strata 4, 353–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Orbigny, A. 1842. Voyage dans l'Amerique méridionale. Part IV. Paléontologie. Paris.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. A. 1920. Geological sections through the Andes of Peru and Bolivia. II. From the port of Mollendo to the Inambari River. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 76, 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, J. A. 1933. The geology of the Marcapata Valley in eastern Peru. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 89, 308–48, 354–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egeler, C. G. & De Booy, T. 1961. Preliminary note on the geology of the Cordillera Vilcabamba (SE Peru), with emphasis on the essentially pre-Andean origin of the structure. Geol. Mijnb. 40, 319–25.Google Scholar
Elles, G. L. & Wood, E. M. R. 1901–1908. Monograph of British Graptolites. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.).Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1974. The Ordovician trilobites of Spitsbergen. I. Olenidae. Norsk Polarinst. Skr. 160, 1–129.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1975(a). The Ordovician trilobites of Spitsbergen. II. Asaphidae, Nileidae, Raphiophoridae and Telephinidae of the Valhallfonna Formation. Norsk Polarinst. Skr. 162, 1–207.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1975(b). Early Ordovician trilobite communities. Fossils & Strata 4, 331–52.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. & Owens, R. M. 1978. Early Ordovician (Arenig) stratigraphy and faunas of the Carmarthen district, south-west Wales. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) 30, 225–96.Google Scholar
Gerth, H. 1932. Geologie Sudamerikas: Geologie der Erde, pt. 1. 1–199. Berlin.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J. & Leanza, A. F. 1957. Ordovician trilobites of Argentina. Dept. Geol. Univ. Kansas Sp. Publ. 1, 1–276.Google Scholar
Havlic˘ek, V. 1970. Heterorthidae (Brachiopoda) in the Mediterranean Province. Sb. geol. Ved. Praha 12, 7–39.Google Scholar
Havlic˘ek, V. 1971. Brachiopodes de l'Ordovicien du Maroc. Notes Mem. Serv. Mines géol. Maroc, Rabat 230, 1–132.Google Scholar
Havlic˘ek, V. 1977. Brachiopods of the order Orthida in Czechoslovakia. Rospr. ústred. Ust. geol. 44, 1–327.Google Scholar
Hopkinson, J. & Lapworth, C. 1875. Descriptions of the graptolites of the Arenig and Llandeilo rocks of St David's. Q. Jl geol. Soc. Lond. 31, 631–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C. P. 1979. The Ordovician trilobite faunas of the Builth-Llandrindod inlier central Wales, Part III. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) 32, 109–82.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. P. In the press. A brief review of the Ordovician faunas of northern South America. Actas Seg. Congr. Arg. Paleont. Bioestrat y Prim. Congr. Latinamer. Paleont. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. P., Ingham, J. K. & Addison, R. 1975. The morphology, classification and evolution of the Trinucleidae (Trilobita). Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B272, 537–604.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. P. & Wright, A. J. 1970. The trilobites Incaia Whittard 1955 and Anebolithus gen.nov. Palaeontology 13, 677–90.Google Scholar
Jaanusson, V. 1960. Graptoloids from the Ontikan and Viruan (Ordov.) limestones of Estonia and Sweden. Bull. geol. Instn Univ. Uppsala 38, 289–366.Google Scholar
Kummel, B. 1948. Geological reconnaissance of the Contamana region, Peru. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 59, 1217–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapworth, C. 1917. Balston Expedition to Peru: Report on graptolites collected by Captain J. A. Douglas, R. E., F.G.S. Geol. Mag. 54, 92–3.Google Scholar
Laubacher, G. 1974. Le paléozoique inférieur de la Cordillère orientale du sud-est du Pérou. Cah. Orstom sér. Geol. 6, 29–40.Google Scholar
Laubacher, G. 1977. Géologie des Andes Perouviennes. Géologiede l'altiplano et de la Cordillère orientale au nord et nord-ouest du lac Titicaca, Pérou. Thèse Doct. Sci. Nat., Monpellier.Google Scholar
Lemon, R. R. H. & Cranswick, J. S. 1956. Graptolites from Huacar, Peru. Publ. Mus. His. nat. ‘Javier Prado’ ser. C. Geol. 5, 1–30.Google Scholar
Marocco, R. 1977. Géologie des Andes Perouviennes. Un segment E. W. de la chaîne des Andes Perouviennes: La deflexion d'Abancay - Etude géologique de la Cordillére orientale et des hauts plateaux entre Cuzco et San Miguel (Sud de Pérou 12° 30' S a 14° 00' S). Thèse Doct. Sci. Nat., Monpellier.Google Scholar
Marocco, R. & Garcia Zabaleta, F. 1974. Estudio geologico de la region entre Cuzco y Machu Picchu. El Ingeniero Geologo. Univ. Nac. Mayor San Marcos. Geologia 16, 9–35. (Also published in Bull. Inst. Et. And. 3 (2), 1–27.)Google Scholar
Mégard, F. 1973. Etude géologique d'une transversale des Andes au niveau du Pérou Central. Thèse Doct. Sci. Nat., Monpellier.Google Scholar
Mégard, F., Dalmayrac, B., Laubacher, G., Marocco, R., Martinez, C., Paredes, J. & Tomasi, P. 1971. La chaîne hercynienne au Pérou et en Bolivie: premiers résultats. Cah. Orstom sér. Geol. 3, 5–44.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I. 1839. The Silurian System Founded on Geological Researches in the Counties of Salop, Hereford, Radnor, Montgomery, Caermarthen, Brecon, Pembroke, Monmouth, Gloucester, Worcester and Stafford; with Descriptions of the Coalfields and Overlying Formations. Murray: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1949. Geology of the Lake Titicaca region, Peru and Bolivia. Mem. Geol. Soc. Am. 36, 1–111.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. & Tafur, I. 1943. Ordovicico fosilifero en la Selva oriental del Perú. Boln. Soc. geol. Peru 14, 5–16.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D. & Tafur, I. 1944. Fossiliferous Ordovician in lowlands of eastern Peru. J. Paleont. 18, 540–5. (English version of Newell & Tafur, 1943.)Google Scholar
Newton, E. T. 1901. Note on graptolites from Peru. Geol. Mag. 38, 195–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pr˘ibyl, A. 1966. The Ordovician ostracods from Bohemia: Cerninella gen.n. Cas. narod. Muz. 135, 201–8.Google Scholar
Rangel, C. 1976. Ilustración y ubicación de algunos fósiles del Paleozoico en el Peru. Boln. Soc. geol. Peru 53, 45–58.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1920. Some new Ordovician trilobites. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv. 64, 273–96.Google Scholar
Rüegg, W. & Fyfe, D. 1950(a). Some outlines on the tectonics of the Upper Amazon embayment. Proc. 18th Int. geol. Congr. London, Part VI. The Geology of Petroleum, pp. 77–85.Google Scholar
Rüegg, W. & Fyfe, D. 1950(b). Algunos aspectos sobre la estructuración de la cuenca del alto Amazonas. Bol. Inst. Sudamer. Petrol. 3, 9–29. (A slightly expanded version in Spanish of Rüegg & Fyfe, 1950a)Google Scholar
Runnegar, B. 1977. Marine fossil invertebrates of Gondwanaland: Palaeogeographic implications. 4th Int. Gondwana Symp., Calcutta. Sec. III, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Skevington, D. 1974. Controls influencing the composition and distribution of Ordovician graptolite faunal provinces. In Graptolite Studies in Honour of O. M. B. Bulman (ed. Rickards, R. B., Jackson, D. E. & Hughes, C. P.). Spec. Pap. Palaeont. 13, 59–73.Google Scholar
Steinmann, G. 1929. Geologie von Peru. Heidelburg. (A Spanish translation was published in 1930.)Google Scholar
Stewart, J. W., Evernden, J. F. & Snelling, N. J. 1974. Age determinations from Andean Peru: a reconnaissance survey. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 85, 1107–16.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubblefield, C. J. 1967. Some results of a recent Geological Survey boring in Huntingdonshire. Proc. geol. Soc. Lond. No. 1637, 35–40.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E. & Cook, H. E. 1976. Continental shelf and slope facies in the Upper Cambrian and lowest Ordovician of Nevada. Geology Stud. Brigham Young Univ. 23, 181–214.Google Scholar
Whittard, W. F. 1955. The Ordovician trilobites of the Shelve Inlier, West Shropshire. Part I. Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.] 1–40.Google Scholar
Whittard, W. F. 1961. The Ordovician trilobites of the Shelve Inlier, West Shropshire. Part V. Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.] 163–96.Google Scholar
Whittard, W. F. 1964. The Ordovician trilobites of the Shelve Inlier, West Shropshire. Part VII. Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.] 229–64.Google Scholar
Whittard, W. F. 1966. The Ordovician trilobites of the Shelve Inlier, West Shropshire. Part VIII. Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.] 265–306.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1957. Ontogeny of Elliptocephala, Paradoxides, Sao, Blainia, and Triarthrus (Trilobita). J. Paleont. 31, 934–46.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. & Hughes, C. P. 1972. Ordovician palaeogeography and faunal provinces as deduced from trilobite distribution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B263, 235–78.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. & Hughes, C. P. 1974. Geography and faunal provinces in the Tremadoc Epoch. In Paleogeographic Provinces and Provinciality (ed. Ross, C. A.). S.E.P.M. Spec. Publ. 21, 203–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, H. B. & Rickards, R. B. 1969. Development of Glossograptus and Skiagraptus, Ordovician graptoloids from Newfoundland. J. Paleont. 43, 800–17.Google Scholar
Williams, A. 1973. Distribution of brachiopod assemblages in relation to Ordovician palaeogeography. In Organisms and Continents Through Time (ed. Hughes, N. F.). Spec. Pap. Palaeont. 12, 241–69.Google Scholar
Williams, A. 1974. Ordovician Brachiopoda from the Shelve District, Shropshire. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.) Suppl. 11.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. J. & Reyes, L. 1964. Geología del Cuadrángulo de Pataz (Hoja 16–h). Com. Carta. geol. Nac. Bol. 9, 1–86.Google Scholar