Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T05:30:25.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modern Pools and Carboniferous Analogies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Benjamin Millard Griffiths
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The origin of coal is a difficult problem which is very far from being solved. The Coal Measure flora has long been extinct, and the modern representatives are feeble folk, almost crowded out of existence by plants of very different appearance and internal structure. The modern marsh flora is not primitive but secondary, and consists almost entirely of land plants which have taken to the water habitat again, just as the whale, porpoise, and seal are land animals which have gone back to rejoin their remote ancestral relatives in the sea. Homologous comparisons between past and present are therefore practically impossible, but some common pool developments of to-day may provide useful analogies if nothing more.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , March 1927 , pp. 127 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

(1) Birge, F. A., and Juday, G., “Inland Lakes of Wisconsin: the Dissolved Gases and their Biological Significance”: Wisc. Geol. and Nat. Hist. Survey, xxxii, 1911.Google Scholar
(2) Erdtman, G., “Studies in Micropalaeontology of Postglacial Deposits of Northern Scotland and the Scotch Isles, with special reference to the History of the Woodlands”: Jour. Linn. Soc., Botany, xlvi, 1924, PP. 449–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Griffiths, B. M., “The Phytoplankton of Bodies of Freshwater”: Journal of Ecology, xi, No. 2, 1923, pp. 184–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Griffiths, , “Algae of Stanklin Pool, Wores.”: Proc. Bham. Nat. Hist. and Phil. Soc., xii, No. 5, 1912, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
(5) Griffiths, B. M., and Cooke, R. B., “Ryton Willows Pool”: Trans. Nat. Hist. Soc. Northumb., Durham, and Newcastle-on-Tyne, N.S., vi, 1924, pp. 39–40.Google Scholar
(6) Lewis, F. J., and Moss, C. E., “Upland Moors of Pennine Chain,” in Types of British Vegetation, ed. Tansley, Camb. Press, 1911, p. 266.Google Scholar
(7) Murray, Sir J., and Pullar, L., Bathymetrical Survey of F. W. Lochs of Scotland, Edinb., 1910.Google Scholar
(8) Pallis, M., “River Valleys of East Norfolk,” in Types of British Vegetation, ed. Tansley, Camb. Press, 1911, P. 214.Google Scholar
(9) Pearsall, W. H., “Aquatic Vegetation of English Lakes”: Journal of Ecology, viii, No. 3, 1920, pp. 163–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10) Rankin, W. M., “Lowland Moors of Lonsdale,” in Types Brit. Veg., p. 247.Google Scholar
(11) West, W., and West, G. S., “Brit. F. W. Phytoplankton”: Proc. Roy. Soc. B, lxxxi, 1909, pp. 165–206.Google Scholar
(12) Whipple, G. C., Microscopy of Drinking Water, 3rd ed., Chapman and Hall, 1914, pp. 117–32.Google Scholar