Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T17:46:28.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II.—The Effects of Pressure on Crystalline Limestones.1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

Those who have carefully studied the crystalline schists cannot fail to have noticed that a community of structure—a sort of family likeness—prevails throughout any one group of rocks, while those which occur apparently at different horizons exhibit dissimilar structures. Thus the marbles associated with any group of crystalline schists are coarse or fine in grain, according to the structure of the latter. But to this rule exceptions appear, at first sight, not infrequent. For instance, in the Alps, we find not uncommonly, in that group of schists which seems to occupy the highest position, marbles which present an abnormally compact aspect. On closer examination they prove indeed to be crystalline in structure, but the crystals seem so small, the general structure so compact, that until we find them graduating into typical mica or other schists, we can hardly feel satisfied we are not being duped by infolded limestones of Mesozoic or Palæozoic age.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1889

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Read before Section C, Brit. Assoc. Newcastle-upon-Tyne Meeting, Sept. 1889.

References

page 483 note 2 Many of the Alpine limestones, both in the Mesozoic and in the Crystalline series, are more or less dolomitic, but I have not thought it necessary to distinguish these. The statements apply to both, except that, among the ordinary sedimentaries, the ‘dolomites’ generally have a more crystalline aspect, and, among the crystalline schists, do not usually show mineral cleavage so readily as those which only contain calcite; they also exhibit the usual differences to which I called attention in 1879 (Q.J.G.S. vol. xxxv. p. 167.Google Scholar)

page 484 note 1 Of course they may have had a clastic nucleus, but of this their present outline shows no trace.

page 485 note 1 Rutley, Rock-forming Minerals, s.v. Calcite.