Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T22:19:43.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—On the Highest Coal-measures or “Zone” of Anthracomya Phillipsi in the Durham Coalfield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

C. T. Trechmann  and
D. Woolacott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been known for some considerable time that the highest beds of the Northumberland and Durham Coalfield lie approximately beneath the town of Sunderland. The great syncline of the Coalmeasures of this area is distinctly accentuated in North-East Durham, so that a secondary basin-like depression is formed, in the centre of which these high beds occur. Beneath Sunderland, -where the top layers also exist, the Carboniferous rocks are concealed by the overlying Permian strata, but at a place called Claxheugh on the Wear, about two miles west of Sunderland, the Coal-measures are exposed for a short distance on both the north and south banks of the river.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 6 , Issue 5 , May 1919 , pp. 203 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 203 note 1 Kirkby, J. W., “On the Occurrence of Fossils in the Highest Beds of the Durham Coal-measures”: Trans. Tyneside Nat. Field Club, vol. 6, pt. ii, pp. 220–5, 1864Google Scholar.

page 203 note 2 Woolacott, D., “Stratigraphy and Tectonics of the Permian of Durham (Northern Area)”: Proc. Univ. Durham Phil. Soc., vol. iv, pt. v, p. 246, 1911–1912Google Scholar.

page 203 note 3 Woolacott, D., “On Sections in the Lower Permian Rocks at Claxheugh and Down Hill, Co. Durham”: Trans. Nat. Hist. Soc. Northumberland, Durham, and Newcastle-upon-Tyne, n.s., vol. v, pt. i, p. 155Google Scholar.

page 205 note 1 The evidence is detailed in “Stratigraphy and Tectonics of the Permian of Durham”: op. jam cit., pp. 288–99Google Scholar.

page 205 note 2 Op. jam cit., p. 159.

page 206 note 1 “On three New Species of Lamellibranchs from the Carboniferous Rocks of Great Britain”: Q.J.G.S., vol. lv, p. 365, 1899Google Scholar.

page 207 note 1 Les Périodes Géologiques, vol. ii, p. 764Google Scholar.

page 207 note 2 “Fauna and Stratigraphy of the Kent Coalfield”: Trans. Inst. Mining Engineers, vol. xlix, pt. iv, p. 33, 1915Google Scholar.

page 209 note 1 Culpin, H. & Grace, G., Naturalist, No. 577, 02, 1905, p. 40Google Scholar.

page 209 note 2 Geology of Nottingham (Geol. Surv. Mem.), 1910, p. 17Google Scholar.

page 209 note 3 Walcot Gibson, Geol. Surv. Mem., 1913, p. 25Google Scholar.

page 209 note 4 Q.J.G.S., vol. lxvii, No. 267, p. 329, 1913Google Scholar.

page 210 note 1 Geol. Mag., 12. VI, Vol. V, p. 470, 1918Google Scholar.

page 210 note 2 Geol. Mag., 12. I, Vol. IV, p. 390, Pl. XVII, 1867Google Scholar.