Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T16:28:54.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

III.—On the Origin of certain Laterites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

The various views put forth prior to 1893 to account for the origin of Indian laterites have been clearly and sufficiently discussed in Oldham's edition of Medlicott & Blanford's Manual of the Geology of India (pp. 369 et seq.). Since that year the only contribution of importance to the literature of lateritic genesis in India is a paper by Mr. Thos. H. Holland, F.R.S., the present Director of the Indian Geological Survey, having for its text the conclusions of Bauer. In it the author suggested that laterite might owe its origin to “some lowly organism,” but no sufficient data were advanced in support of the suggestion. Bauer's specimens indicated a certain amount of dehydration in laterites, and this fact, together with the absence of hydration products from certain peridotites in Southern India, was deemed to indicate a general dehydration for the bauxitic laterites of the Deccan. The gibbsite (Al2 O3, 3 H2O) of laterite was supposed to be dehydrated to diaspore (A2 O3, H2O), and it was assumed that “this irregular loss of water is probably the cause of variation in bauxite.”

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 536 note 1 Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. X (1903), pp. 5969.Google Scholar

page 536 note 2 “Beiträge zur Geologie der Seychellen”: Neues Jahr. für Min., vol. ii (1898), p. 163.Google Scholar

page 536 note 3 Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. VI (1899), pp. 31, 542.Google Scholar

page 536 note 4 Ib., Dec. IV, Vol. X (1903), p. 65.

page 536 note 5 See, however, Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. X (1903), p. 139.Google Scholar

page 536 note 6 Min. Mag., vol. xiii (1902), p. 172.Google Scholar Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. X (1903), p. 154;Google Scholar ib., Dec. V, Vol. II (1905), p. 21.

page 537 note 1 Rec. Geol. Surv. India, vol. xvi (1833), p. 113.Google Scholar

page 537 note 2 Ib., vol. xxxiii, p. 178.

page 537 note 3 Journ. As. Soc. Bengal, vol. xiii (1844), p. 990.Google Scholar

page 537 note 4 Mem. Geol. Surv. India, vol. xxiv (1890), pt. iii, p. 17.Google Scholar

page 538 note 1 See, however, Mallet, Rec. Geol. Surv. India, vol. xvi (1833), p. 117Google Scholar; Bose, ib., vol. xxii (1889), p. 225.Google Scholar

page 538 note 2 Mem. Geol. Surv. India, vol. xxiv (1890), pt. iii, p. 17.Google Scholar

page 539 note 1 Quoted by Merrill, : “Rocks, etc.,” p. 178.Google Scholar

page 539 note 2 Pogg. Annal., vol. vii, pp. 341, 429.

page 539 note 3 Journ. Phys. Chem., vol. ii (1898), pp. 7790.Google Scholar

page 539 note 4 Geol. Mag., Dec. V, Vol. II (1905), p. 21.Google Scholar

page 539 note 5 Lindgren, : Trans. Amer. Inst. M.E., vol. xxx, p. 614.Google Scholar

page 540 note 1 [A more satisfactory formula to represent the process of sericitization in alkali felspars is that given by Van Hise (Metamorphism, p. 254): 3 K Al Si3 O8 + H2 O + C O2 K H2, Al3 Si3 O12 + 6 Si O2 + K2 C O3.—Edit. Geol. Mag.]

page 540 note 2 U.S. Geol. Surv., Mon. 47 (1904), p. 227.Google Scholar

page 540 note 3 Amer. Journ. Sci., vol. xlii (1891), p. 491.Google Scholar

page 541 note 1 U.S. Geol. Surv., 19th Ann. Rep. (1899), pt. ii, p. 85.Google Scholar

page 542 note 1 Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. X (1903), p. 69.Google Scholar

page 542 note 2 Lake: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, vol. xxiv (1890), pt. 3, p. 30.Google Scholar

page 542 note 3 Fermor, L. L.: Rec. Geol. Surv. India, vol. xxxiii (1906), p. 173.Google Scholar

page 543 note 1 Oldham: in Medlicott & Blanford's Manual of Geol. India, pp. 374 et seq.

page 544 note 1 Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. X (1903), p. 158.Google Scholar

page 544 note 2 Rec. Geol. Surv. India, vol. xxxii (1849), p. 179.Google Scholar

page 544 note 3 Loc. cit. sup., p. 155.

page 546 note 1 Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. X (1903), p. 65.Google Scholar

page 547 note 1 Broughton, Journ. As. Soc. Bombay, vol. v (1857), p. 639;Google Scholar Lapparent, Traité de Géologie, p. 1611.

page 547 note 2 Journ. As. Soc. Bombay, vol. v (1857), p. 63.Google Scholar