Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T06:23:21.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II.—Graphical Methods in Field-Geology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

A. Harker
Affiliation:
St. John's College, and Demonstrator in Petrology in the Woodwardian Museum, Cambridge.

Extract

In determining the actual position of strata from the appearances presented by their exposed edges in natural and artificial sections, certain mathematical problems are of constant occurrence. To a field-geologist who is not content with rough guesses founded on judgments by eye, the solution of these problems is a matter of importance, and methods have accordingly been given for some of those most frequently met with. These solutions take the form of (1.) trigonometrical formulæ, which can be applied only with the aid of trigonometrical and logarithmic tables; (2.) tables specially prepared from these formulæ for use in the field; (3.) graphical methods, requiring only a ruler, scale and protractor, which may be conveniently combined in one instrument. Of the first kind is the formula for deducing the true dip of strata from two apparent dips, given in Green's Geology (p. 341, 1st ed.), etc. Among special tables are those of Mr. Jukes for finding the apparent dip in any direction from the true dip, and for connecting the dip, thickness and depth of beds: these tables are given in the appendix to the Survey Memoir on the Geology of the South Staffordshire Coal-field, and reproduced in Jukes's “Manual of Geology.” Graphical methods have been used for finding the true dip from two apparent dips: a method partly graphical but requiring a table of cotangents is given in Phillips's “Treatise on Geology” (p. 298, 5th ed.), and also by the Rev. E. Hill (Geol. Mag. 1876, p. 334); a purely graphical method by Mr. W. H. Dalton (Geol. Mag. 1873, p. 332); and an approximate method by Mr. Penning (Geol. Mag. 1876, p. 236), reproduced in his “Field Geology.” As Prof. Green has pointed out (ib. p. 377), the last-named method is equivalent to taking the angle for its tangent, and so applicable only to small angles of dip. Mr. Dalton's solution (loc. cit. p. 334) of another question, to find the effect on strata already inclined of a second tilt in a new direction, is only an approximation, and cannot be applied if the dips are considerable. It is erroneously assumed that the inclination of the strata in a direction at right angles to that of the second tilt is unaltered by the tilting.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1884

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 155 note1 To indicate the degree of the approximation, suppose the two observed dips to make an angle of 60° with one another; then if the amounts of the dips be 15° and 20° respectively, the error in determining the direction of true dip by Mr. Penning's method is less than 1°; if the dips be 30° and 40°, it is about 4°; if 45° and 60°, it is 11°; and if 60° and 80°, the error amounts to 29°!