Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T06:09:06.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

I—Arrangement of the Leaves in the Australian Species of Noeggerathiopsis.1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. Etheridge jun.
Affiliation:
Director and Curator of the Australian Museum, Sydney.
A.C. Seward
Affiliation:
Professor of Botany in the University of Cambridge.

Extract

In 1849 Professor J. D. Dana described certain leaves from the Illawarra District and Newcastle, New South Wales, occurring in the Upper Coal-measures. To these he gave the name of Noeggerathia spathulata and N. media. Long after, in 1879 to be exact, Dr. O. Feistmantel established his genus Noeggerathiopsis for the reception of similar leaves from the Talchir-Kararbari Beds of the Lower Gondwana System, and from his remarks it may, by inference, be concluded that Dana's were included in the new genus also. This inference is justified by Feistmantel's later definite reference of these leaves to Noeggerathiopsis; at the same time he added another species, N. prisca, from the Lower Coal-measures at Greta. He believed them to be closely allied with Cycadeaceae.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1918

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 289 note 2 Dana, , Wilkes U.S. Explor. Exped., Geol. x, p. 715, pi. xii, figs. 9, 10, 1849.Google Scholar

page 289 note 3 Feistmantel, , “Foss. Flora Gondwana Syst.” (Pal. Indica), iii, pt. i, p. 23, 1879.Google Scholar

page 289 note 4 Feistmantel, , Palæontographica, Supp. Bd. iii, Lief, iii, Heft ii, pp. 158, 162, 1879.Google Scholar

page 290 note 1 Arber, ,Cat. Foss. Plants Glossopteris Flora Brit. Mus., pp.178–9, 1905.Google Scholar.

page 290 note 2 Dana, ,Wilkes, , U.S. Explor. Exped., Geol. x, p. 715,1849.Google Scholar.

page 290 note 3 Dana, ibid., pl. xii, fig. 9..

page 290 note 4 Ten. Woods, Proc. Linn. Soc. Wales, N.S., iii, pt. i, p. 117, 1883.Google Scholar

page 290 note 5 Quart., ArberJourn. Geol. Soc., lvii, p.18, pl. i, fig. 1, 1902.Google Scholar.

page 291 note 1 Seward, , Rec. Geol. Surv. India, xxvi, pt. i, p. 60, 1907. The close affinity of the two genera in question is supported by Zeiller, 1882 (Ann. Mines, Livr. Sept.–Oct. 1882); Schenk, 1890 (Zittel's Handb. Pal., Abth. ii, p. 330, footnote); Kurtz, 1894Google Scholar(Revista Museo de la Plata, v, pp. 130–1, 1894)Google Scholar; White, , 1908 (Com. Estudos Minas Brazil, Relatorio final, 1908, pt. iii, p.546)Google Scholar;Krasser, , 1909 (Jahrb. Geol. Reichst. Wien, lix, Heft i, p.121,1909)Google Scholar;Seward, , 1907 (Rec. Geol. Surv. India, xxxvi, pt. i, p.60,1907)Google Scholar;Seward, , 1907 (Trans. Geol. Soc. S. Africa, x, p.707, 1907).Google Scholar.

page 292 note 1 Renault, Cours Bot. Foss., i, pl. xii, fig. 1, 1881.

page 292 note 2 Grand-Eury, loc. cit., pl. xviii, fig. 8.

page 292 note 3 Zeiller, , Ann. des Mines, 1882, 0910., p. 26 (separate copy).Google Scholar

page 292 note 4 Lesquereux, , Descrip. Coal Flora Carb. Form. Pennsylvania (Second Geol. Surv. Penn., Report Progress, P), i, p.525,1880.Google Scholar

page 292 note 5 Lesquereux, loc. cit., p. 540, pl. lxxxvii, figs. 5, 6.