Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T06:33:44.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Eocene-Oligocene planktic foraminiferal transition: extinctions, impacts and hiatuses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Eustoquio Molina
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geología (Paleontología), Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Concepción Gonzalvo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geología (Paleontología), Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Gerta Keller
Affiliation:
Department of Geological and Geophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J. 08544, U.S.A.

Abstract

Biostratigraphic study and re-examination of 22 late Eocene to early Oligocene sections provides data in support of three and possibly a fourth late Eocene impact events in the G. index Zone during a period of about 1 Ma of the middle Priabonian between 34.7 and 35.7 Ma. No major species extinctions or significant species abundance changes directly coincide with these impact events. Species extinctions are gradual and selective, affecting primarily cool-temperature-intolerant surface dwellers. These extinctions began with the onset of global cooling during the early middle Eocene and culminated near the Eocene/Oligocene boundary. The global cooling was associated with the isolation of Antarctica as Australia moved northward, the development of a circum-Antarctic circulation, growth of Antarctic ice sheet beginning by late middle Eocene time and a change from a thermospheric to thermohaline circulation. We find no evidence that the multiple late Eocene impact events directly contributed to the climatic deterioration already in progress.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, W. & Montanari, A. 1988. The scaglia limestones (late Cretaceous-Oligocene) in the Northeastern Apennines carbonate sequence: stratigraphic context and geological significance. In The Eocene-Oligocene Boundary in the Marche-Umbria Basin (Italy) (eds Premoli Silva, I., Coccioni, R. and Montanari, A.), pp. 1329. Ancona: IUGS Special Publication.Google Scholar
Barrera, E. & Huber, B. T. 1991. Paleogene and early Neogene oceanography of the southern Indian Ocean: leg 119 Foraminifera stable isotope results Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results 119, 693717.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V. & Flynn, J. J. 1985. Paleogene, geochronology and chronostratigraphy. In The Chronology of the Geological Record (ed. Snelling, H. J.), pp. 141–93. Geological Society Memoir no. 10.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., Obradovich, J. D. & Swisher, C. 1992. Toward a revised Paleogene geochronology. In Eocene-Oligocene Climatic and Biotic Evolution (eds Prothero, D. R. and Berggren, W. A.), pp. 4673. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A. & Miller, K. G. 1988. Paleogene planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and magnetobiochronology Micropaleontology 34, 362–80.Google Scholar
Berggren, W. A. & Prothero, D. R. 1992. Eocene Oligocene climatic and biotic evolution. In Eocene-Oligocene Climatic and Biotic Evolution (eds Prothero, D. R. and Berggren, W. A.), pp. 128. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bice, D. M. & Montanari, A. 1988. Magnetic stratigraphy of the Massignano section across the Eocene-Oligocene boundary. In The Eocene-Oligocene Boundary in the Marche-Umbria Basin (Italy) (eds Premoli Silva, I., Coccioni, R. and Montanari, A.), pp. 111–17. Ancona: IUGS Special Publication.Google Scholar
Boersma, A., Premoli Silva, I. & Shackleton, N. J. 1987. Atlantic Eocene planktonic foraminiferal paleohydrographic indicators and stable isotopic paleoceanography Paleoceanography 2, 287331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolli, H. M. 1966. Zonation of Cretaceous to Pliocene marine sediments based on planktonic foraminifera Boletin informativo, Asociacion Venezolana de Geologia, Mineralogia y Petroleo 9, 332.Google Scholar
Coccioni, R., Monaco, P., Monechi, S., Nocchi, M. & Parisi, G. 1988. Biostratigraphy of the EoceneOligocene boundary at Massignano (Ancona, Italy). In The Eocene-Oligocene Boundary in the Marche-Umbria Basin (Italy) (eds Premoli Silva, I., Coccioni, R. and Montanari, A.), pp. 5980. Ancona: IUGS Special Publication.Google Scholar
D'hondt, S. L., Keller, G. & Stallard, R. F. 1987. Major element compositional variation within and between different late Eocene microtektite strewnfields Meteoritics 22, 6179.Google Scholar
Ehrmann, W. U. & MacKensen, A. 1992. Sedimentological evidence for the formation of an East Antarctic ice sheet in Eocene/Oligocene time Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology 93, 85112.Google Scholar
Glass, B. P. 1989. North American tektites debris and impact ejecta from DSDP Site 612 Meteoritics 24, 209–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, B. P. & Burns, C. A. 1987. Late Eocene crystal-bearing spherules: two layers or one? Meteoritics 22, 265–79.Google Scholar
Glass, B. P., Burns, C. A., Crosbie, J. R. & Dubois, D. L. 1985. Late Eocene North American microtektites and clinopyroxene bearing spherules. Journal of Geophysical Research (Supplement) 90, 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, B. P. & Crosbie, J. R. 1982. Age of Eocene/Oligocene boundary based on extrapolation from North American microtektite layer American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 66, 471–6.Google Scholar
Glass, B. P., Hall, C. M. & York, D. 1986. 40Ar/39Ar laser-probe dating of North American tektite fragments from Barbados and the age of the Eocene-Oligocene boundary Chemical Geology (Isotope Geoscience Section) 59, 181329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalvo, C. & Molina, E. 1992. Los Foraminíferos planctónicos del tránsito Eoceno-Oligoceno en Torre Cardela (España) y Massignano (Italia): Bioestratigrafía y Cronoestratigrafía Revista Española de Paleontología 7 (2), 109–26.Google Scholar
Haq, B. U., Hardenbol, J. & Vail, P. R. 1987. The new chronistratigraphic basis of Cenozoic and Mesozoic sea level cycles. In Timing and Depositional History of Eustatic Sequences: Constraints on Seismic Stratigraphy (eds Ross, C. A. and Harman, D.), pp. 714. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 24.Google Scholar
Hazel, J. E. 1989. Chronostratigraphy of Upper Eocene Microspherules Palaios 4, 318–29.Google Scholar
Keigwin, L. & Keller, G. 1984. Middle Oligocene cooling from equatorial Pacific DSDP Site 77B Geology 12, 1619.Google Scholar
Keller, G. 1982/1983. Biochronology and paleoclimatic implications of Middle Eocene to Oligocene planktonic foraminiferal faunas. Marine Micropaleontology 7, 463–86.Google Scholar
Keller, G. 1983. Paleoclimatic analyses of middle Eocene through Oligocene planktic foraminiferal faunas Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology 43, 7394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, G. 1985. Eocene and Oligocene stratigraphy and erosional unconformities in the Gulf of Mexico and Gulf coast Journal of Paleontology 59, 882903.Google Scholar
Keller, G. 1986. Stepwise mass extinction and impact events: late Eocene to early Oligocene Marine Micropaleontology 10, 267–93.Google Scholar
Keller, G. & Barron, J. 1983. Paleoceanographic implications of deep-sea hiatuses Geological Society of America Bulletin 94, 590613.Google Scholar
Keller, G., D'hondt, S. L. & Vallier, T. L. 1983. Multiple microtektite horizons in upper Eocene marine sediments: no evidence for mass extinction Science 221, 150–2.Google Scholar
Keller, G., D'hondt, S. L., Orth, C. J., Gilmore, J. S., Oliver, P. Q., Shoemaker, E. M. & Molina, E. 1987 a. Late Eocene impact microspherules: stratigraphy, age and geochemistry Meteoritics 22, 2560.Google Scholar
Keller, G., Herbert, T., Dorsey, R., D'hondt, S., Joi-Insson, M. & Chi, W. R. 1987 b. Global distribution of Late Paleogene hiatuses Geology 15, 199203.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, G. & MacLeod, N. 1992. Faunal turnover and depth stratification: their relationships to climate and productivity events in the Eocene to Miocene pelagic realm. In Centenary of Japanese Micropaleontology (eds Ishizaki, K. and Saito, T.), pp. 114. Tokyo, Japan: Terra Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Keller, G., MacLeod, N. & Barrera, E. 1992. EoceneOligocene faunal turnover in planktic foraminifera, and Antarctic glaciation. In Eocene-Oligocene Climatic and Biotic Evolution (eds Prothero, D. R. and Berggren, W. A.), pp. 218–44. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kennett, J. P. 1977. Cenozoic evolution of Antarctic glaciation, the circum-Antarctic Ocean and their impact on global paleoceanography Journal of Geophysical Research 82, 3843–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennett, J. P. 1980. Paleoceanographic and biogeographic evolution of the Southern Ocean during the Cenozoic, and Cenozoic microfossil datums Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology 31, 123–52.Google Scholar
MacLeod, N. 1990. Effect of late Eocene impacts on planktic foraminifera. In Global Catastrophes in Earth History (eds Sharpton, V. L. and Ward, P. D.), pp. 595606. Geological Society of America, Special Paper no. 247.Google Scholar
MacLeod, N. & Keller, G. 1991 a. How complete are Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary sections? A chronostratigraphic estimate based on graphic correlation Geological Society of America Bulletin 103, 1439–57.Google Scholar
MacLeod, N. & Keller, G. 1991 b. Hiatus distribution and mass extinctions at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary Geology 19, 497501.Google Scholar
Martínez-Gallego, J. 1977. Estudio micropaleontológico del Nummulítico de un sector comprendido entre Moreda-Piñar-Pedro Martinez (Zona Subbética). Publicatión Universidad de Granada: Doctoral Thesis, 506 pp.Google Scholar
Martínez-Gallego, J. & Molina, E. 1975. Estudio del tránsito Eoceno-Oligoceno con foraminiferos planctónicos sur de Torre Cardela (provincia de Granada, Zona Subbetica) Cuadernos de Geologia 6, 177–95.Google Scholar
Miller, K. G., Berggren, W. A., Zhang, J. & Palmerjulson, A. A. 1991. Biostratigraphy and isotope stratigraphy of Upper Eocene microtektites at site 612: how many impacts? Palaios 6, 1738.Google Scholar
Miller, K. G. & Hart, M. 1987. Cenozoic planktonic foraminifera, DSDP leg 95 (northwest Atlantic) and hiatuses on the New Jersey slope and rise Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 95, 253–65.Google Scholar
Molina, E. 1979. Oligocene-Mioceno inferior por medio de foraminíferos planctónicos en el sector central de las Cordilleras Béticas (España). Publicatión Universidades Granada y Zaragoza: Doctoral Thesis, 342 pp.Google Scholar
Molina, E. 1986. Description and biostratigraphy of the main reference section of the Eocene/Oligocene boundary in Spain: Fuente Caldera section Developments in Paleontology and Stratigraphy 9, 5363.Google Scholar
Molina, E., Keller, G. & Madile, M. 1988. Late Eocene to Oligocene events: Molino de Cobo, Betic Cordillera, Spain Revista Española de Microplaeontologia 20, 491514.Google Scholar
Molina, E., Monaco, P., Nocchi, M. & Parisi, G. 1986. Biostratigraphic correlation between the central subbetic (Spain) and Umbro-Marchean (Italy) pelagic sequences at the Eocene/Oligocene boundary using Foraminifera Developments in Paleontology and Stratigraphy 9, 7585.Google Scholar
Montanari, A. 1988. Geochemical characterization of volcanic biotites from the upper Eocene-upper Miocene pelagic sequence for the Northeastern Apennines. In The Eocene-Oligocene Boundary in the Marche-Umbria Basin (Italy) (eds Premoli Silva, I., Coccioni, R. and Montanari, A.), pp. 209–27. Ancona: IUGS Special Publication.Google Scholar
Montanari, A. 1990. Geochronology of the terminal Eocene impacts: an update. In Global Catastrophes in Earth History (eds Sharpton, V. L. and Ward, P. D.), pp. 607–16. Geological Society of America, Special Paper no. 247.Google Scholar
Montanari, A. 1991. Two Ir anomalies near the semiinvoluta/cerroazulensis boundary in the E/O boundary stratotype of Massignano (Italy): new evidence for multiple late Eocene impacts. American Geophysical Union 1991, Programs and Abstracts,. p. 1425.Google Scholar
Montanari, A., Deino, A. L., Drake, R. E., Turrin, B. D., Depaolo, D. J., Odin, G. S., Curtis, G. H., Alvarez, W. & Bice, D. M. 1988. Radioisotopic dating of the Eocene-Oligocene boundary in the pelagic sequence of the northeastern Apennines. In The Eocene-Oligocene Boundary in the Marche-Umbria Basin (Italy) (eds Premoli Silva, I., Coccioni, R. and Montanari, A.), pp. 195208. Ancona: IUGS Special Publication.Google Scholar
Odin, G. S., Barbin, V., Hurford, A. J., Baadsgaard, H., Galbrun, B. & Gillot, P. Y. 1991. Multi-method radiometric dating of volcano-sedimentary layers from northern Italy: age and duration of the Priabonian stage Earth and Planetary Science Letters 106, 151–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odin, G. S., Clauser, S. & Renard, M. 1988. Sedimentological and geochemical data on the Eocene-Oligocene boundary at Massignano (Apennines, Italy). In The Eocene-Oligocene Boundary in the Marche-Umbria Basin (Italy) (eds I. Premoli Silva, R. Coccioni and A. Montanari), pp. 175186. Ancona: IUGS Special Publication.Google Scholar
Odin, G., Guise, P., Rex, D. C. & Kreuzer, H. 1988. K-Ar and 39Ar/40Ar geochronology of late Eocene biotites from the northeastern Apennines. In The Eocene-Oligocene Boundary in the Marche-Umbria Basin (Italy) (eds I., Premoli Silva, R., Coccioni and Montanari, A.), pp. 239–45. Ancona: IUGS Special Publication.Google Scholar
Odin, G. S. & Montanari, A. 1988. The Eocene-Oligocene boundary at Massignano (Ancona, Italy): a potential boundary stratotype. In The Eocene-Oligocene Boundary in the Marche-Umbria Basin (Italy) (eds I., Premoli Silva, R., Coccioni and Montanari, A.), pp. 253–63. Ancona: IUGS Special Publication.Google Scholar
Odin, G. S., Montanari, A., Deino, A., Drake, R., Guise, P. G., Kreuzer, H. & Rex, D. C. 1991. Reliability of volcano-sedimentary biotite ages across the Eocene-Oligocene boundary (Apennines, Italy) Chemical Geology (Isotope Geoscience Section) 86, 203–24.Google Scholar
Pomerol, C. H. & Premoli Silva, I. (eds). 1968. Terminal Eocene Events. Developments in Paleontology and Stratigraphy 7. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 414 pp.Google Scholar
Premoli Silva, I., Coccioni, R. & Montanari, A. (eds). 1988. The Eocene-Oligocene Boundary in the Marche-Umbria Basin (Italy). Ancona: JUGS Special Publication, 268 pp.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R. & Berggren, W. A. (eds). 1992. Eocene-Oligocene Climatic and Biotic Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 566 pp.Google Scholar
Prothero, D. R. & Swisher, C. C. 1992. Magnetostratigraphy and geochronology of the terrestrial Eocene-Oligocene transition in North America. In Eocene-Oligocene Climatic and Biotic Evolution (eds Prothero, D. R. & Berggren, W. A.), pp. 4673. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. B., Bernoulli, D., Muller-Merz, E., Oberhansli, H., Perch-Nielsen, K., Riedel, W. R., Sanfilippo, A. & Torrini, R. Jr 1984. Stratigraphy of the late middle Eocene to early Oligocene in the Bath Cliff section, Barbados, West Indies Micropaleontology 30, 390425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thein, J. 1987. A tektite layer in upper Eocene sediments of the New Jersey continental slope (site 612, leg 95) Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 95, 565–74.Google Scholar
Ujiie, H. 1975. Planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy in the western Philippine Sea, leg 31, DSDP Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 31, 677–92.Google Scholar