^{page 99 note 1} See Brit. Assoc. Reports, 1847, p. 127, and Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc 1858, Vol. ix., p. 317Google Scholar.

^{page 99 note 2} See Memoirs Geol. Survey of Great Britain, 1860, Description of Sheet No. 58, S.E, and 1861, Description of Sheet, No. 53, N.E.

^{page 99 note 3} See the interesting paper by Professor Phillips, “On some comparative sections in the Oolitic and Ironstone series of Yorkshire, Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc. Vol. xiv,—“Neither can the Bath type of the Oolites be adapted to the midland districts of England without some important changes.” (P. 86). Also Geol. York. i. p. 130.

^{page 100 note 1} Pal. Soc. Suppl. to Gr. Ool. Mollusca, p. 115. The Cotteswold Hills, p. 74.

^{page 100 note 2} Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 1859. D'Orb. Prodrome, 1850Google Scholar.

^{page 100 note 3} Die Jura-Formation, p. 326, 333.

^{page 100 note 4} Ibid, p. 439.

^{page 100 note 5} Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vii. Translations, p. 60Google Scholar.

^{page 101 note 1} Outlines of Geology, England and Wales, 1821, p. 218Google Scholar.

^{page 101 note 2} On the Comparison of the German Jura with that of France and England. See Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. vii. 1851, Translation, p. 58Google Scholar.

^{page 102 note 1} See Die Jura-Formationen, 1856–58, p. 357.

^{page 102 note 2} The Cotteswold Hills, p. 73.

^{page 103 note 1} Morris, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc, ix. p. 330Google Scholar.

^{page 103 note 2} Bedford, W., Account of the Strata of Lincoln, Mag. Nat. Hist. 1839, p. 653. The Cathedral is built of the “silver-bed” and of the beds below it; the Roestone was used for the construction of Newport Arch, built by the RomansGoogle Scholar.

^{page 104 note 1} See a paper by Mr. Horton in the Geologist, vol. iii, p. 249.

^{page 104 note 2} Fitton, , Geol. Trans., vol. iv. p. 309, but corrected at, p. 383*, and also in Geol. Jour., vol. xi. p. 337Google Scholar.