Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-plzwj Total loading time: 0.52 Render date: 2022-05-16T16:34:18.297Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Archaeocyathan zonation of the Yangtze Platform: Implications for regional and global correlation of lower Cambrian stages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2015

AIHUA YANG*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlindadao Ave., Nanjing 210046, China
MAOYAN ZHU
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
ANDREY YU ZHURAVLEV
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Evolution, Faculty of Biology, Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russia
KEXING YUAN
Affiliation:
Kunming Prospecting Design Institute of China Nonferrous Metals Industry, Kunming 650051, China
JUNMING ZHANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
YAQIAN CHEN
Affiliation:
Kunming Prospecting Design Institute of China Nonferrous Metals Industry, Kunming 650051, China
*
Author for correspondence: ahyang@nju.edu.cn

Abstract

Detailed analysis of the distribution of archaeocyaths in five lower Cambrian sections in South China has resulted in the erection of four new archaeocyathan zones and one new archaeocyathan bed. Listed in order of ascending age, these are: the Dailycyathus xiuqiensis Zone; the Dictyocyathus shaanxiensis Zone; the Spirillicyathus duplex Range Zone; the Sibirecyathus meitanensis Range Zone; and the Archaeocyathus yanjiaoensis beds. These new subdivisions permit a correlation of lower Cambrian strata both within the area of the Yangtze Platform (South China) as well as between this region and Siberia, Australia, Western Europe and North America. Within the Yangtze Platform area, archaeocyaths of the Dailycyathus xiuqiensis and Dictyocyathus shaanxiensis zones co-occur with trilobites of the middle and upper Eoredlichia Trilobite Zone of the Qiongzhusian Stage. The Spirillicyathus duplex and the Sibirecyathus meitanensis Range Zone correspond to the Malungia, Yiliangella–Yunnanaspis and Drepanuroides Trilobite zones of the basal and middle Canglangpuan Stage, respectively. Finally, the Archaeocyathus yanjiaoensis beds belong to the Palaeolenus fengyangensis Trilobite Zone of the upper Canglangpuan Stage. Global correlations based on archaeocyath assemblage zones suggest that: (1) the middle–upper Qiongzhusian of South China correlates with the middle Atdabanian Stage of the Siberian Platform, the Warriootacyathus wilkawillinensis Archaeocyath Zone in South Australia, the middle Issendalenian Stage of Morocco and the lower Ovetian Stage in Spain; (2) the lowermost Canglangpuan Stage of South China correlates with the uppermost Atdabanian of the Siberian Platform, the Spirillicyathus tenuis – Jugalicyathus tardus archaeocyath zones in South Australia, the uppermost Issendalenian – lower Banian stages of Morocco, the middle Ovetian Stage of Spain and the middle Montezuman Stage of North America; (3) the middle Canglangpuan Stage approximates the lowermost Botoman Stage of the Siberian Platform, middle Banian Stage of Morocco, the uppermost Ovetian – lowermost Marianian stages of Spain and the upper Montezuman Stage of North America; (4) the uppermost Canglangpuan Stage is equivalent of the middle Toyonian Stage of the Siberian Platform, Archaeocyathus abacus beds in Australia, the middle Bilbilian Stage in Spain and the middle Dyeran Stage (Bolbolenellus euryparia Trilobite Zone) in North America.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adachi, N., Nakai, T., Ezaki, Y. & Liu, J. B. 2014. Late Early Cambrian archaeocyath reefs in Hubei Province, South China: modes of construction during their period of demise. Facies 60, 703–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvaro, J. J., Elicki, O., Geyer, G., Rushton, A. W. A. & Shergold, J. H. 2003. Palaeogeographical controls on the Cambrian trilobite immigration and evolutionary patterns reported in the western Gondwana margin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 195, 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astashkin, V. A., Belyaeva, G. V., Esakova, N. V., Osadchaya, D. V., Pakhomov, N. N., Pegel’, T. V., Repina, L. N., Rozanov, A. Yu. & Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1995. The Cambrian System of the Foldbelts of Russia and Mongolia. Correlation Chart and Explanatory Notes. International Union of Geological Sciences, Special Publication no. 32, 132 pp.Google Scholar
Astashkin, V. A., Pegel, T. V., Repina, L. N., Rozanov, A. Yu., Shabanov, Yu. Ya., Zhuravlev, A. Yu., Sukhov, S. S. & Sundukov, V. M. 1991. The Cambrian System on the Siberian Platform. Correlation Chart and Explanatory Notes. International Union of Geological Sciences, Special Publication no. 27, 133 pp.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. E. & Peng, S. 2007. Cambrian chronostratigraphy: current state and future plans. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 254, 62–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, L. E., Peng, S., Geyer, G. & Shergold, J. H. 2005. Changing perspectives on Cambrian chronostratigraphy and progress toward subdivision of the Cambrian System. Geosciences Journal 9, 101–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belyaeva, G. V. 1988. Cambrian of the East of the USSR. Stratigraphy. Moscow: Nauka, 136 pp (in Russian).Google Scholar
Belyaeva, G. V., Luchinina, V. A., Nazarov, B. B, Repina, L. N. & Sobolev, L. P. 1975. Cambrian fauna and flora of the Dzhagdy Range (Far East). Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 226, 1208 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Belyaeva, G. V. & Yuan, K. X. 1995. New archaeocyathan taxa from the Lower Cambrian of central China. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal 2, 140–3 (in Russian with English abstract).Google Scholar
Bengtson, S., Conway Morris, S., Cooper, B. J., Jell, P. A. & Runnegar, B. N. 1990. Early Cambrian Fossils from South Australia. Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, Memoir 9, 1364.Google Scholar
Borodina, N. P., Konyushkov, K. N., Osadchaya, D. V., Belyaeva, G. V. & Okuneva, O. G. 1973. Subdivision of the Lower Cambrian Sanashtykgol Horizon in the Sayan Altay Foldbelt and its analogues in the geosyncline regions in the territory of the USSR (based on archaeocyaths). Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 49, 100–19 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Chang, W. T. 2003. Cambrian biostratigraphy of China. In Biostratigraphy of China (eds Chang, W. T., Chen, P. J. & Palmer, A. R.), pp. 55119. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Chang, W. T., Babcock, L. E., Xiang, L. W., Sun, W. G., Luo, H. L. & Jiang, Z. W. 2001. Lower Cambrian stratigraphy of Chengjiang, eastern Yunnan, China with special notes on Chinese Parabadiella, Moroccan Abadiella and Australian Abadiella huoi . Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 40, 289307 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Chi, Y. S. 1940. Cambrian Archaeocyathina from the Gorge District of the Yangtze. Geological Society China, Bulletin 20, 121–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. A. & Shergold, J. H. 1991. Palaeozoic invertebrates of Antarctica. In The Geology of Antarctica (ed. Tingey, R. J.), pp. 455–86. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics no. 17.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Debrenne, M. 1995. Archaeocyaths of the Lower Cambrian of Morocco. In Morocco ’95, the Lower-Middle Cambrian Standard of Western Gondwana (eds Geyer, G. & Landing, E.). Beringeria Special Issue 2, 121–45.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Gandin, A. 1985. La formation de Gonnesa (Cambrien, SW Sardaigne). Biostratigraphie, paléogeographie, paléoecologiedes archéocyathes. Société Géologique de France, Bulletin 8 (1), 531–40.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F., Gandin, A. & Debrenne, M. 1993. Calcaires à archéocyathes du Membre de la vallée de Matoppa (Formation de Nebida), Cambrien inférieur du Sud-Ouest de la Sardaigne (Italie). Annales de Paléontologie 79, 77118.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F., Gandin, A. & Rowland, S. M. 1989. Lower Cambrian bioconstructions in northwestern Mexico (Sonora). Depositional setting, palaeoecology and systematics of archaeocyaths. Geobios 22, 137–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debrenne, F., Gandin, A. & Zhuravlev, A. 1991. Palaeoecological and sedimentological remarks on some Lower Cambrian sediments of the Yangtze platform (China). Société Géologique de France, Bulletin 162, 575–83.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Gravestock, D. I. 1990. Archaeocyatha from the Sellick Hill Formation and Fork Tree Limestone on Fleurieu Peninsula, South Australia. In The Evolution of a Late Precambrian–Early Palaeozoic Rift Complex: the Adelaide Geosyncline (eds Jago, J. B. & Moore, P. J.), pp. 290309. Geological Society of Australia, Special Publication no. 16.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Jiang, Z. W. 1989. Archaeocyathan fauna from the Lower Cambrian of Yunnan (China). Société Géologique de France, Bulletin 8 (4), 819–28.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Kruse, P. D. 1986. Shackleton limestone archaeocyaths. Alcheringa 10, 235–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debrenne, F., Kruse, P. D. & Zhang, S. G. 1991. An Asian compound archaeocyath. Alcheringa 15, 285–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Peel, J. S. 1986. Archaeocyatha from the Lower Cambrian of Peary Land, central North Greenland. Rapport Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgerlse 132, 3950.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F., Rozanov, A. & Zhuravlev, A. 1990. Regular Archaeocyaths: Morphology, Systematic, Biostratigraphy, Palaeogeography, Biological affinities. Paris: Cahiers de Paléontologie, Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 218 pp.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Wood, R. 1990. A new Cambrian sphinctozoan sponge from North America, its relationship to archaeocyaths and the nature of early sphinctozoans. Geological Magazine 127, 435–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1990. New irregular archaeocyath taxa. Geobios 25, 595–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debrenne, F. & Zhuravlev, A. 1992. Irregular Archaeocyaths: Morphology, Ontogeny, Systematics, Biostratigraphy, Palaeoecology. Paris: Cahiers de Paléontologie, Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 212 pp.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F., Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Kruse, P. D. 2002. Class Archaeocyatha Bornemann, 1884. Bibliography of Class Archaeocyatha. In Systema Porifera.A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. Volume 2. (eds Hooper, J. N. A. & van Soest, R. W. M.), pp. 1539–699. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
Debrenne, F., Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Kruse, P. D. 2015. Systematic descriptions: Archaeocyatha. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part E, Volume 4 (ed. Selden, P. A.), pp. 1186. Lawrence: University of Kansas Paleontological Institute.Google Scholar
Dyatlova, I. N. & Sycheva, R. F. 1999. New data on Lower Cambrian biostratigraphy of East Sayan. Stratigrafiya. Geologicheskaya korrelyatsiya 7 (4), 313 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gandin, A. & Luchinina, V. A. 1993. Occurrence and environmental meaning of the Early Cambrian calcareous algae of the Tianheban Formation of China (Yangtze area). In Studies on Fossil Benthic Algae (eds Barattolo, F., De Castro, P. & Mucchi, M. Parente). Società Paleontologica Italiana, Bollettino Special Volume 1, 211–7.Google Scholar
Gehling, J. G., Jago, J. B., Paterson, J. R., García-Bellido, D. C. & Edgecombe, G. D. 2011. The geological context of the Lower Cambrian (Series 2) Emu Bay Shale Lagerstätte and adjacent stratigraphic units, Kangaroo Island, South Australia. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 58, 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, G. 1998. International, trilobite-based correlation of the Moroccan early Middle Cambrian. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 35, 374401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, G. & Landing, E. 1995. The Cambrian of the Moroccan Atlas regions. In Morocco ’95, the Lower-Middle Cambrian Standard of Western Gondwana (eds Geyer, G. & Landing, E.). Beringeria Special Issue 2, 746.Google Scholar
Geyer, G. & Palmer, A. R. 1995. Neltneriidae and Holmiidae (Trilobita) from Morocco and the problem of Early Cambrian intercontinental correlation. Journal of Paleontology 69, 459–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, G. & Shergold, J. 2000. The quest for internationally recognized divisions of Cambrian time. Episodes 23, 188–95.Google Scholar
Gozalo, R., Dies Álvarez, M. E., Gámez Vintaned, J. A., Zhuravlev, A. Yu., Bauluz, B., Subías, I., Chirivella Martorell, J. B., Mayoral, E., Gursky, H.-J., Andrés, J. A. & Liñán, E. 2013. Proposal of a reference section and point for the Cambrian Series 2–3 boundary in the Mediterranean subprovince in Murero (NE Spain) and its intercontinental correlation. Geological Journal 48, 142–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravestock, D. I. 1984. Archaeocyatha from lower parts of the Lower Cambrian carbonate sequence in South Australia. Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, Memoir 2, 1139.Google Scholar
Gravestock, D. I., Alexander, E. M., Demidenko, Yu. E., Esakova, N. V., Holmer, L. E., Jago, J. B., Lin, T.-R., Melnikova, L. M., Parkhaev, P. Yu., Rozanov, A. Yu., Ushatinskaya, G. T., Zang, W. -L., Zhegallo, E. A. & Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 2001. The Cambrian biostratigraphy of the Stansbury Basin, South Australia. Palaeontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Transactions 282, 1344.Google Scholar
Gravestock, D. I. & Gatehouse, C. G. 1995. Stansbury Basin. In The Geology of South Australia. Volume 2, The Phanerozoic (eds Drexel, J. F. & Preiss, W. V.). Geological Survey of South Australia, Bulletin 54, 519.Google Scholar
Gravestock, D. I. & Shergold, J. H. 2001. Australian Early and Middle Cambrian sequence biostratigraphy with implications for species diversity and correlation. In The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation (eds Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Riding, R.), pp. 107–36. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Guo, S. Z. 1981. Lower Cambrian Archaeocyathids from the central part of Da Hinggan Ling. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 20 (1), 60–3 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Hicks, M. & Rowland, S. M. 2009. Early Cambrian microbial reefs, Archaeocyathan inter-reef communities, and associated facies of the Yangtze Platform. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 281, 137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. S. 2006. Holmiidae (Trilobita: Olenellina) of the Montezuman Stage (Early Cambrian) in western Nevada. Journal of Paleontology 80, 309–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. S. 2007. Fallotaspidid trilobite assemblage (Lower Cambrian) from the Esmeralda Basin (western Nevada, U.S.A.): The oldest trilobites from Laurentia. Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, Memoir 32, 123–40.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. S. 2008. The first trilobites in Laurentia and elsewhere. In Advances in Trilobite Research (eds Rábano, I., Gozalo, R. & García-Bellido, D.). Cuadernos del Museo Geominero 9, 171–5.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. S. 2011. Lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of Cambrian Stage 3 in western Nevada and eastern California. In Cambrian Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Northern Arizona and Southern Nevada (eds Hollingsworth, J. S., Sundberg, F. A. & Foster, J. R.). Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin 67, 2642.Google Scholar
Hong, Z., Yang, Y. & Liu, X. 1990. Archaeocyathid fossils from the Lower Cambrian Jianchang Formation of the southern Liaodong Peninsula. Geological Review 36, 558–63 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Jago, J. B., Lin, T. R. & Dunster, J. N. 2002. A new species of the trilobite Abadiella from the Lower Cambrian of the eastern Officer Basin, South Australia. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 41, 428–33.Google Scholar
Jago, J. B., Zang, W.-L., Sun, X., Brock, G. A., Paterson, J. R. & Skovsted, C. B. 2006. A review of the Cambrian biostratigraphy of South Australia. Palaeoworld 15, 406–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jell, P. 2002. Phylogeny of Early Cambrian trilobites. In Trilobites and Their Relatives, Contributions from the Third International Conference, Oxford, 2001 (eds Lane, P. D., Siveter, D. J. & Fortey, R. A.). Special Papers in Paleontology 70, 4557.Google Scholar
Kerner, A. & Debrenne, F. 2013. The role of Archaeocyatha in Cambrian biostratigraphy and biogeography. In Early Palaeozoic Biogeography and Palaeogeography (eds Harper, D. A. T. & Servais, T.), pp. 5966. Geological Society, London, Memoir no. 38.Google Scholar
Khomentovskiy, V. V. & Repina, L. N. 1965. Lower Cambrian of the Stratotype Sections of Siberia. Moscow: Nauka, 200 pp (in Russian).Google Scholar
Korobov, M. N. 1980. Lower Cambrian biostratigraphy and miomeran trilobites of Mongolia. In Lower Cambrian and Carboniferous Biostratigraphy of Mongolia (eds Menner, V. V. & Meyen, S. V.). Sovmestnaya Sovetsko-Mongol'skaya Geologicheskaya Ekspeditsiya, Trudy 26, 5108 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Korobov, M. N. 1989. Lower Cambrian biostratigraphy and polymeran trilobites of Mongolia. Sovmestnaya Sovetsko-Mongol'skaya Geologicheskaya Ekspeditsiya, Trudy 48, 1204 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kruse, P. D. 1982. Archaeocyathan biostratigraphy of the Gnalta Group at Mt. Wright, New South Wales. Palaeontographica (Abt. A) 177, 129212.Google Scholar
Kruse, P. D. 1991. Cyanobacterial-archaeocyathan-radiocyathan bioherms in the Wirrealpa Limestone of South Australia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 28, 601–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruse, P. D. & Moreno-Eiris, E. 2013. Archaeocyaths of the White Point Conglomerate, Kangaroo Island, South Australia. Alcheringa 38, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landing, E., Geyer, G., Brasier, M. D. & Bowring, S. A. 2013. Cambrian Evolutionary Radiation: Context, correlation, and chronostratigraphy—Overcoming deficiencies of the first appearance datum (FAD) concept. Earth-Science Reviews 123, 133–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, T. R. 2014. Application of cluster analysis to the taxonomy of palaeolenid trilobites, China – a new approach to the biozony classification of the upper part of Canglangpu Formation of the Qiandongian series in China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 53 (1), 108–20.Google Scholar
Liñán, E., Gámez Vintaned, J. A., Gozalo, R., Dies Álvarez, M. E. & Mayoral, E. 2006. Events and biostratigraphy in the Lower Cambrian of Iberia. Deutsche Gessselschaft für Geowissenschaften, Zeitschrift 157, 597609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansy, J. L., Debrenne, F. & Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1993. Calcaires à archéocyathes du Cambrien inférieur du Nord de la Colombie britannique (Canada). Implications paléogéographiques et précisions sur l’extension du continent américano-koryakien. Geobios 26, 643–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinov, N. A., Zonenshain, L. P. & Blagonravov, V. A. 1973. The Geology of the Mongolian People's Republic. Volume 1: Stratigraphy. Moscow: Nedra, 584 pp (in Russian).Google Scholar
Mcmenamin, M. A. S., Debrenne, F. & Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 2000. Early Cambrian Appalachian archaeocyaths: Further age constraints from the fauna of New Jersey and Virginia, U.S.A. Geobios 33, 693708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okuneva, O. G. & Repina, L. N. 1973. Biostratigraphy and fauna of the Cambrian of Primor’e). Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 37, 1284 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Osadchaya, D. V. 1986. Once more on the Lower Cambrian zonation of the Altay Sayan Foldbelt. In Cambrian Biostratigraphy and Palaeontology of Northern Asia (ed. Zhuravleva, I. T.). Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 669, 4054 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Osadchaya, D. V., Kashina, L. N., Zhuravleva, I. T., Borodina, N. P. & Boyarinov, A. S. 1979. Lower Cambrian Stratigraphy and Archaeocyaths of the Altay Sayan Region. Moscow: Nauka, 215 pp (in Russian).Google Scholar
Osadchaya, D. V. & Kotel’nikov, D. S. 1998. Archaeocyathids from the Atdabanian (Lower Cambrian) of the Altay Sayan Foldbelt, Russia. Geodiversitas 20, 518.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. & Halley, R. B. 1979. Physical stratigraphy and trilobite biostratigraphy of the Carrara Formation (Lower and Middle Cambrian) in the southern Great Basin. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1047, 1–131.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. & Repina, L. N. 1993. Through a glass darkly: Taxonomy, phylogeny, and biostratigraphy of the Olenellina. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, New Series 3, 135.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. & Rowell, A. J. 1995. Early Cambrian trilobites from the Shackleton Limestone of the central Transantarctic Mountains. Paleontological Society Memoir 45, 128.Google Scholar
Paterson, J. R. & Brock, G. A. 2007. Early Cambrian trilobites from Angorichina, Flinders Ranges, South Australia, with a new assemblage from the Pararaia bunyerooensis Zone. Journal of Paleontology 81, 116–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pegel’, T. V. 2000. Evolution of trilobite biofacies in Cambrian basins of the Siberian Platform. Journal of Paleontology 74, 1000–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pegel’, T. V. & Sukhov, S. 2013. Cambrian biostratigraphy and sedimentary evolution of the Siberian Platform. In Proceedings of the 3rd IGCP 591 Annual Meeting. Lund, Sweden, 919 June 2013 (eds Lindskog, A. & Mehlqvist, K.), pp 260–65. Lund University.Google Scholar
Peng, S. C., Babcock, L. E. & Cooper, R. A. 2012. The Cambrian Period. In The Geologic Time Scale, 1st edition (eds Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., Schmitz, M. & Ogg, G.), pp. 437–88. Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier B. V. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perejón, A. 1984. Bioestratigrafía de los Arqueociatos en España. Cuadernos de Geología Ibérica 9, 213–65.Google Scholar
Perejón, A. 1994. Palaeogeographic and biostratigraphic distribution of Archaeocyatha in Spain. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 172, 341–54.Google Scholar
Perejón, A., Fröhler, M., Bechstädt, T., Moreno-Eiris, E. & Boni, M. 2000. Archaeocyathan assemblages from the Gonnesa Group, Lower Cambrian (Sardinia, Italy) and their sedimentological context. Società Paleontologica Italiana, Bollettino 39, 257–91.Google Scholar
Perejón, A. & Moreno-Eiris, E. 2006. Biostratigraphy and paleobiogeography of the archaeocyaths on the south-western margin of Gondwana. Deutsche Gessselschaft für Geowissenschaften, Zeitschrift 157, 611–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repina, L. N. 1986. Lower Cambrian stage-level global correlation by trilobites. In Cambrian Biostratigraphy and Palaeontology of Northern Asia (ed. Zhuravleva, I. T.). Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 669, 425 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Repina, L. N., Khomentovskiy, V. V., Zhuravleva, I. T. & Rozanov, A. Yu. 1964. Lower Cambrian Biostratigraphy of the Sayan Altay Foldbelt. Moscow: Nauka, 364 pp (in Russian).Google Scholar
Robison, R. A., Rosova, A. V., Rowell, A. J. & Fletcher, T. P. 1977. Cambrian boundaries and divisions. Lethaia 10, 257–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu., Khomentovskiy, V. V., Shabanov, Yu. Ya., Karlova, G. A., Varlamov, A. I., Luchinina, V. A., Pegel’, T. V., Demidenko, Yu. E., Parkhaev, P. Yu., Korovnikov, I. V. & Skorlotova, N. A. 2008. To the problem of stage subdivision of the Lower Cambrian. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 16 (1), 119.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu., Missarzhevskiy, V. V., Volkova, N. A., Voronova, L. G., Krylov, I. N., Keller, B. M., Korolyuk, I. K., Lendzion, K., Mikhnyak, R., Pykhova, N. G. & Sidorov, A. D. 1969. The Tommotian Stage and the Cambrian lower boundary problem. Geologicheskiy Institut, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 206, 1380 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Yu. & Sokolov, B. S. 1984. Lower Cambrian Stage Subdivision. Stratigraphy. Moscow: Nauka, 184 pp (in Russian).Google Scholar
Shergold, J. H. & Geyer, G. 2003. The Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy: the status quo . Geologica Acta 1, 59.Google Scholar
Steiner, M., Weber, B. & Geyer, G. 2001. The Lower Cambrian of eastern Yunnan: Trilobite-based biostratigraphy and related fossils. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 40 (Sup.), 6379.Google Scholar
Theokritoff, G. 1982. Correlation of the Elliptocephala asaphoides fauna of eastern New York. Northeastern Geology 4, 131–3.Google Scholar
Varlamov, A. I., Rozanov, A. Yu., Demidenko, Yu. E., Karlova, G. A., Pak, K. L., Parkhaev, P. Yu., Skorlotova, N. A., Khomentovsky, V. V. & Shabanov, Yu. Ya. 2013. Proposals of Cambrian stage subdivision for the general stratigraphic scale of Russia. In General Stratigraphic Chart of Russia: Current State and Prospects (ed. Fedonkin, M. A.), pp. 7987. Moscow: GIN RAN (in Russian).Google Scholar
Voronova, L. G., Drozdova, N. A., Esakova, N. V., Zhegallo, E. A., Zhuravlev, A. Yu, Rozanov, A. Yu., Sayutina, T. A. & Ushatinskaya, G. T. 1987. Lower Cambrian fossils of the Mackenzie Mountains (Canada). Paleontologicheskiy Institut, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy 224, 188 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1906. Cambrian faunas of China. United States National Museum, Proceedings 29, 563–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, M. 2011. Trilobite biostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy of the upper Dyeran (traditional Laurentian “Lower Cambrian”) in the southern Great Basin, U.S.A. In Cambrian Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Northern Arizona and Southern Nevada (eds Hollingsworth, J. S., Sundberg, F. A. & Foster, J. R.). Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin 67, 121–54.Google Scholar
Wrona, R. & Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1996. Early Cambrian archaeocyaths from glacial erratics of King George Island (South Shetland Islands), Antarctica. In Palaeontological Results of the Polish Antarctic Expeditions. Part II (ed. Gaździcki, A.). Palaeontologia Polonica 55, 936.Google Scholar
Xiang, L. W., Zhu, Z. L., Li, S. J. & Zhou, Z. Q. 1999. Stratigraphy of Chinese Cambrian. Beijing: Geological Press, 95 pp (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Yang, A. H. & Yuan, K. X. 2012. New archaeocyaths from the early Cambrian of Shaanxi and Guizhou provinces, South China. Geobios 45, 591601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, A. H., Zhu, M. Y., Zhang, J. M. & Li, G. X. 2004. Early Cambrian eodiscoid trilobites of the Yangtze Platform and their Stratigraphic implications. Progress in Natural Science 13 (11), 861–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazmir, M. M., Dalmatov, B. A. & Yazmir, I. K. 1975. Atlas of Fauna and Flora of the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic of the Buryat ASSR. Palaeozoic. Moscow: Nedra, 181 pp (in Russian).Google Scholar
Yuan, J. L. & Zhao, Y. L. 1999. Subdivision and correlation of Lower Cambrian in Southwest China, with a discussion of the age of Early Cambrian series biota. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 38 (Sup.), 116–31 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Yuan, J. L., Zhu, X. J., Lin, J. B. & Zhu, M. Y. 2011. Tentative correlation of Cambrian Series 2 between South China and other continents. Bulletin of Geosciences 86 (3), 397404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, K. X. 1974. Archaeocyatha. In A Handbook of the Stratigraphy and Palaeontology in Southwest China (ed. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica). pp. 80–2. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Yuan, K. X. 1980. Archaeocyatha. In Palaeontological Atlas of Southwest China. Guizhou Volume: Cambrian—Devonian (ed. Stratigraphy and Palaeontology Team, Guizhou Province), pp. 16–8. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Yuan, K. X. & Zhang, S. G. 1977. Archaeocyatha. In Atlas of Palaeontology in Central and Southern China. Part 1, Lower Palaeozoic (ed. Institute of Geological Sciences, Hubei Province and Bureaux of Geology, Honan, Hubei, Hunan and Guangdong Provinces and Guangxi Autonomous Region), pp. 48. Beijing: Geological Publishing House (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Yuan, K. X. & Zhang, S. G. 1978. Archaeocyatha. In Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of Sinian to Permian in the Eastern Part of the Yangtze Gorge (ed. Three Yangtze Gorges Geological Research Unit, Geological Bureau of Hubei Province), pp. 138–41. Beijing: Geological Publishing House (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Yuan, K. X. & Zhang, S. G. 1980. Lower Cambrian Archaeocyatha of central and southwestern China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 19, 380–91 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Yuan, K. X. & Zhang, S. G. 1981. Lower Cambrian archaeocyathid assemblages of central and southwestern China. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 187, 3946.Google Scholar
Yuan, K. X. & Zhang, S. G. 1982. Phylum Archaeocyatha. In Palaeontological Atlas of Northwest China, Shaanxi–Gansu–Ningxia Volume, Part 1: Precambrian and Early Palaeozoic (ed. Xi’an Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources), pp. 311. Beijing: Geological Publishing House (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Yuan, K. X. & Zhang, S. G. 1983. Biogeographical provinces of Early Cambrian archaeocyathids in China. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, Bulletin 6, 101–16 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Yuan, K. X., Zhu, M. Y., Zhang, J. M. & Van Iten, H. 2001. Biostratigraphy of archaeocyathan horizons in the Lower Cambrian of Fucheng section, South Shaanxi Province: Implications for regional correlations and archaeocyathan evolution. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 40 (Sup.), 115–29.Google Scholar
Zhang, S. G. 1983. The early Cambrian Archaeocyatha from Kuluk in Xinjiang Province. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 22 (1), 919 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhang, S. G. 1989. Stratigraphic succession and geographical distribution of archaeocyathids in China. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences 3, 119–24.Google Scholar
Zhang, S. G. & Yuan, K. X. 1984. Lower Cambrian archaeocyathids in Weiganping from Fuquan, China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 23, 543–53 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhang, S. G. & Yuan, K. X. 1985. Discovery of the genus Cambrocyathellus in China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 24, 518–27 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhang, J. M. & Yuan, K. X. 1994. Archaeocyath reefs from Lower Cambrian Tianheban Formation at Wangjiaping, Yichang, Hubei and their diagenesis. Chinese Journal of Geology 29, 236–45 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
Zhu, M. Y., Babcock, L. E. & Peng, S. C. 2006. Advances in Cambrian stratigraphy and paleobiology: integrating correlation techniques, paleobiology, taphonomy and paleoenvironmental reconstruction. Palaeoworld 15, 217–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, M. Y., Li, G. X., Zhang, J. M., Steiner, M., Qian, Y. & Jiang, Z. W. 2001. Early Cambrian stratigraphy of East Yunnan, Southwestern China: A synthesis. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 40 (Sup.), 439.Google Scholar
Zhu, M. Y., Pak, K. L., Babcock, L. E. & Rozanov, A. Yu. 2007. Chinese-Russian symposium on the Lower Cambrian stratigraphy. Paleontological Journal 41, 227–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1988. Lower Cambrian archaeocyaths of the extreme northeast of the USSR. In Cambrian of Siberia and central Asia (eds Zhuravleva, I. T. & Repina, L. N.,). Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR 720, 97110 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1995. Preliminary suggestions on the global early Cambrian zonation. In Morocco’95, the Lower-Middle Cambrian Standard of Western Gondwana (eds Geyer, G. & Landing, E.). Beringeria Special Issue 2, 147–60.Google Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. 1998. Early Cambrian archaeocyathan assemblages of Mongolia. In IV Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group, Sweden, August 1998 (eds Ahlberg, P., Eriksson, M. & Olsson, I.). Lund Publications in Geology 142, 24–5.Google Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Gravestock, D. I. 1994. Archaeocyaths from Yorke Peninsula, South Australia and archaeocyathan Early Cambrian zonation. Alcheringa 18, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Naimark, E. B. 2005. Alpha, beta, or gamma: Numerical view on the Early Cambrian world. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 220, 207–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Riding, R. 2001. Introduction. In The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation (eds Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Riding, R.), pp. 17. New York, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Wood, R. A. 2008. Eve of biomineralization: Controls on skeletal mineralogy. Geology 36, 923–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T. 1960. Archaeocyaths of the Siberian Platform. Moscow: Akademiya nauk SSSR, 344 pp (in Russian).Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T., Konyaeva, I. A., Osadchaya, D. V. & Boyarinov, A. S. 1997 a. Biostratigraphy of the Kiya River section. Early Cambrian archaeocyaths and spicular sponges from the Kiya River section (Kuznetsk Alatau). Annales de Paléontologie (Vertébrés-Invertébrés) 83, 392 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T., Konyaeva, I. A., Osadchaya, D. V. & Boyarinov, A. S. 1997 b. Biostratigraphy of the Kiya River section. Early Cambrian archaeocyaths and spicular sponges from the Kiya River section (Kuznetsk Alatau). Annales de Paléontologie (Vertébrés-Invertébrés) 83, 115200 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T., Korshunov, V. I. & Rozanov, A. Yu. 1969. The Atdabanian Stage and its justification based on the archaeocyaths of the stratotype section. In Lower Cambrian Biostratigraphy and Palaeontology of Siberia and the Far East (ed. Zhuravleva, I. T.), pp. 559. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T., Repina, L. N., Yaskovich, B. V., Khayrullina, T. I., Poniklenko, I. A. & Luchinina, V. A. 1970. To the Study of the Early Cambrian of the Southern Tien Shan. Tashkent: Fan, 53 pp (in Russian).Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T., Zadorozhnaya, N. M., Osadchaya, D. V., Pokrovskaya, N. V., Rodionova, N. M. & Fonin, V. D. 1967. Lower Cambrian Fauna of Tuva (Shivelig-Khem River Reference Section). Moscow: Nauka, 182 pp (in Russian).Google Scholar
17
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Archaeocyathan zonation of the Yangtze Platform: Implications for regional and global correlation of lower Cambrian stages
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Archaeocyathan zonation of the Yangtze Platform: Implications for regional and global correlation of lower Cambrian stages
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Archaeocyathan zonation of the Yangtze Platform: Implications for regional and global correlation of lower Cambrian stages
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *