Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T00:59:17.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies of linkage in populations. X. Altitude and autosomal gene arrangements in Drosophila robusta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Max Levitan*
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York, New York, New York 10029
Sonja J. Scheffer
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York11794
*
Corresponding author.

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Data are presented concerning the gene arrangements in the second and third chromosomes of Drosophila robusta in eight altitudinal transects. A consistent change is the increase in the arrangement 2L-3, particularly in the linkage combination 2L-3.2R, with increasing altitude. The reciprocal decrease with increasing altitude affects several different 2-left arrangements, most consistently 2L-1. The arrangements of 2-right show no significant variation with altitude, and those of 3-right do so only in a few samples of the two northern transects studied, none in any of the southern ones. These results confirm previous evidence for the significant role of the arrangements of the left arm of the second chromosome in the adaptations of this species to altitude and suggest further that interactions of linked arrangements are involved in these adaptations. The data also indicate that the factors responsible for the altitudinal adaptations of this species are in many cases not the same ones that are responsible for variations in its gene arrangements with latitude.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

References

Armentrout, H. C. (1963). Chromosomal polymorphism inDrosophila robusta populations on Unaka Mountain, Tennessee. Unpublished Master's thesis, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Carson, H. L. (1953). The effect of inversions on crossing over inDrosophila robusta. Genetics 38, 168186.Google Scholar
Carson, H. L. (1958). The population genetics of Drosophila robusta. Advances in Genetics 9, 140.Google Scholar
Carson, H. L. (1969). Genetic conditions which promote or retard the formation of species. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 24, 87105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, H. L. & Stalker, H. D. (1947). Gene arrangements in natural populations of Drosophila robusta Sturtevant. Evolution 1, 113133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler, J. A. (1977). Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Etges, W. J. (1984). Genetic structure and change in natural populations of Drosophila robusta: systematic inversion and inversion association frequency shifts in the Great Smoky Mountains. Evolution 38, 675688.Google ScholarPubMed
Etges, W. J. (1989). Chromosomal influences on life-history variation along an altitudinal transect inDrosophila robusta. American Naturalist 133, 83110.Google Scholar
Levitan, M. (1950). Retention of a pericentric inversion in populations of Drosophila robusta. Genetics 35, 674.Google Scholar
Levitan, M. (1951). Experiments on chromosomal variability inDrosophila robusta. Genetics 36, 285305.Google Scholar
Levitan, M. (1953 a). Interchromosomal influences on recombination of chromosomal segments inDrosophila robusta. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Sciences 28, 183.Google Scholar
Levitan, M. (1953 b). Crossing over adjacent to overlapping and included inversions. Drosophila Information Service 27, 98.Google Scholar
Levitan, M. (1954). Position effects in natural populations. American Naturalist 88, 419423.Google Scholar
Levitan, M. (1955). Studies of linkage in populations. I. Associations of second chromosome inversions in Drosophila robusta. Evolution 9, 6274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitan, M. (1958 a). Non-random associations of inversions. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 23, 251268.Google Scholar
Levitan, M. (1958 b). Studies of linkage in populations. II. Recombination between linked inversions of D. robusta. Genetics 43, 620633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levitan, M. (1961 a). A complex X-chromosome linkage association. Anatomical Record 139, 312.Google Scholar
Levitan, M. (1961 b). Proof of an adaptive linkage association. Science 134, 16171619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levitan, M. (1964 a). Geographic and sex factors in an autosomal linkage disequilibrium: an exercise in basic research. Journal of the American Medical Women's Association 19, 370379.Google Scholar
Levitan, M. (1964 b). Spontaneous chromosome aberrations in D. robusta since October 1960. I. X-chromosome inversions among the first 559. Drosophila Information Service 39, 8996.Google Scholar
Levitan, M. (1973 a). Studies of linkage in populations. VI. Periodic selection for X-chromosome gene arrangement combinations. Evolution 27, 215225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levitan, M. (1973 b). Studies of linkage in populations. VII. Temporal variation and X-chromosomal linkage disequilibriums. Evolution 27, 476485.Google ScholarPubMed
Levitan, M. (1978). Studies of linkage in populations. IX. The effect of altitude on X-chromosomal arrangement combinations in Drosophila robusta. Genetics 89, 751763.Google Scholar
Levitan, M. (1982). The robusta and melanica groups. In The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila (ed. Carson, H. L. Ashburner and Thompson, J. N.) Vol. 3b, pp. 141192. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Levitan, M. (1992). Chromosomal variation in Drosophila robusta Sturtevant. In Drosophila Inversion Polymorphism (ed. Krimbas, C. B. and Powell, J. R.), 221338. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Massie, W. & Levitan, M. (1956). Structural and genie influences in recombination between inversions. Genetics 41, 652653.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. (1987). BIOM: A Package of Statistical Programs to Accompany the Text, Biometry. Stony Brook, New York: privately published.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1981). Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 2nd ed.New York: W. H.Freeman.Google Scholar
Stalker, H. D. & Carson, H. L. (1948). An altitudinal transect of Drosophila robusta Sturtevant. Evolution 2, 295305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar