Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T21:35:40.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the relationship between heterochromatization and variegation in Drosophila, with special reference to temperature sensitive periods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Ingeborg J. Hartmann-Goldstein
Ingeborg J. Hartmann-Goldstein
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Sheffield, U.K.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using a strain of D. melanogaster carrying an X-4 translocation, comparison between groups of individuals cultured at 14°, 19° and 25°C. showed good correlation between heterochromatization, variegation in malpighian tubules and Notch. All these phenomena are enhanced by low temperatures. Correlation was less good within each temperature group, and considerable variability was observed between individuals within the group, and between nuclei from one individual.

Experiments involving a temperature change during the embryonic period indicate that (1) heterochromatization is especially temperature-sensitive during the early embryonic period but may be increased by low temperature later, (2) larval malpighian tubules are sensitive to temperature only during the early embryonic stage, and (3) N is influenced by temperature during early embryonic life and also during the larval period.

Our observations, in conjunction with those of other workers, could be explained as follows: exposure of individuals to low temperature at a time when a specific system is beginning to differentiate will cause the processes concerned to be blocked in some cells. At least during the early embryonic stages this appears to involve heterochromatization of the relevant locus. Once the processes are established which will lead to the formation of a character, further heterochromatization has no effect on the phenotype. Temperature may affect pupal or adult phenotype in this way or by a direct action on the metabolic processes of cells.

Further experiments showed: (1) the greatest temperature-sensitivity of all three phenomena within the first 6 hours of embryonic life; (2) striking fluctuations of the effect of temperature, especially within the early embryonic period; (3) close correspondence between all three phenomena in time of response to temperature. Some alternative interpretations are considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , October 1967 , pp. 143 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

References

REFERENCES

Becker, H. J. (1957). Über Röntgenmosaikflecken und Defektmutationen am Auge von Drosophila und die Entwicklungsphysiologie des Auges. Z. indukt. Abstamm.- u. Vererb-Lehre 88, 333–373.Google Scholar
Becker, H. J. (1960). Variegation in the zeste eye color alleles and its bearing on gene action during development of the eye in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 45, 519–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, H. J. (1961). Untersuchungen zur Wirkung des Heterochromatins auf die Genmanifestierung bei Drosophila melanogaater. Zool. Anz. 24 (Suppl.), 283–291.Google Scholar
Bodenstein, D. (1950). In Biology of Drosophila (M., Demerec, ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bridges, C. B. (1938). A revised map of the salivary gland X-chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Hered. 29 (Suppl.), 11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, C. B. & Brehme, K. S. (1944). The Mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Washington: Carnegie Institute of Wash. Publ. 552.Google Scholar
Caspersson, T. & Schultz, J. (1938). Nucleic acid metabolism of the chromosomes in relation to gene reproduction. Nature, Lond. 142, 294–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S. Y. (1948). Action de la température sur trois mutants a panachure de Drosophila melanogaster: w 258–18, w m5 & z. Bull Biol. 82, 114–129.Google Scholar
Darlington, C. D. & La Cour, L. F. (1940). Nucleic acid starvation of chromosomes in Trillium. J. Genet. 40, 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. (1944). Distribution of heterochromatin in chromsomes of Drosophila pallidipennis. Am. Nat. 78, 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, A. F. (1964). Heterochromatin in American and Japanese species of Trillium. II. The behaviour of H-segments. Cytologia, 29, 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. & Yates, F. (1963). Statistical Tables, 6th ed.Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Gowen, J. W. & Gay, E. H. (1933). Effect of temperature on eversporting eye colour in Drosophila melanogaster. Science, N.Y. 77, 312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grumbach, M. M., Morishima, A. & Taylor, J. H. (1963). Human sex chromosome abnormalities in relation to DNA replication and heterochromatization. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 49, 581–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, O. & Meyer, G. F. (1963). Chromosomal differentiations of the lampbrush type formed by the Y chromosome in Drosophila hydei and Drosophila neohydei. J. Cell. Biol. 16, 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, T. C. (1965). In Cells and Tissues in Culture Methods, Biology and Physiology I (Willmer, E. N., ed.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, B. P. (1934). Somatic mitoses of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Morph. 56, 125–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Cour, L. F., Deeley, E. M. & Chayen, J. (1956). Variations in the amount of feulgen stain in nuclei of plants grown at different temperatures. Nature, Lond. 177, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefevre, G. & Wilkins, M. D. (1966). Cytogenetic studies on the white locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 53, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, E. B. (1950). The phenomenon of position effect. Adv. Genet. 3, 73–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noujdin, N. I. (1945). Hereditary changes and ontogenesis. Zh. obshch. Biol. 6, 381–410.Google Scholar
Ohno, S. (1965). Relationship of the ambivalent nature of the mammalian X to the phenotypic expression of X-linked genes as well as the autosomal genes translocated to the X. Ber. 8 Tag. Deutsch. Ges. Anthrop., 14–25.Google Scholar
Ohno, S. & Lyon, M. F. (1965). Cytological study of Searle's X-autosome translocation in Mus musculus. Chromosoma, 16, 90–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plaut, W. & Nash, D. (1964). In The Role of Chromosomes in Development (M., Locke, ed.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Plaut, W., Nash, D. & Fanning, T. (1966). Ordered replication of DNA in polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. J. molec. Biol. 16, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulson, D. F. (1950). In Biology of Drosophila (M., Demerec, ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Prokofieva-Belgovskaya, A. A. (1941). Cytological properties of inert regions and their bearing on the mechanisms of mosaicism and chromosome rearrangement. DIS, 15, 35–36.Google Scholar
Prokofieva-Belgovskaya, A. A. (1947). Heterochromatization as a change of chromosome cycle. J. Genet. 48, 80–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, L. B. (1961). Genetics of mammalian sex chromosomes. Science, N.Y. 133, 1795–1803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, J. (1941). Function of heterochromatin. Proc. VII Int. Gongr. Genet., 257–262.Google Scholar
Schultz, J. (1956). The relation of the heterochromatic chromosome regions to the nucleic acids of the cell. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 21, 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welshons, W. J. (1965). Analysis of a gene in Drosophila. Science, N.Y. 150, 1122–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed