Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T22:02:35.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kappa, mu and the metagon hypothesis in Paramecium aurelia*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Barbara J. Byrne
Barbara J. Byrne
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, U.S.A.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The loss of mu 540, mu 138, and kappa 51 following the loss of the dominant genes required for their maintenance was studied. With mu 540 and mu 138 the loss usually occurred within 4–7 cell generations, but occasional cells with mu were found as late as generation 12 with mu 540 and generation 17 with mu 138. Kappa 51 was lost between 5 and 60 fissions in different clones. The variability in time of loss remains unexplained.

2. No trail of inheritance of resistance to specific kappa killing comparable to the trail of inheritance reported for mu 540 by Gibson & Beale (1962) was found.

3. No loss of kappa 51, mu 540, mu 138, or mu 130 was found following treatment of paramecia with RNase.

4. Didinium nasutum was shown to be able to acquire and maintain kappa 51 when it could not possibly have acquired any RNase-sensitive metagons from paramecia.

5. These results show that the metagon hypothesis cannot be accepted without a number of ad hoc and at present untestable assumptions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 1969 , pp. 197 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

References

REFERENCES

Beale, G. H. & Jurand, A. (1966). Three different types of mate-killer (mu) particles in Paramecium aurelia (syngen 1). J. Cell Sci. 1, 31–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beale, G. H. & McPhail, S. (1967). Some additional results on the maintenance of kappa particles in Paramecium aurelia (stock 51) after loss of gene K. Genet. Res. 9, 369–373.Google Scholar
Chao, P. K. (1953). Kappa concentration per cell in relation to the life cycle, genotype and mating type in Paramecium aurelia, variety 4. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 39, 103–113.Google Scholar
Chao, P. K. (1954 a). A study of some of the factors that control the maintenance and concentration of kappa per cell in stock 51, variety 4 killers of Paramecium aurelia. Ph.D. thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Chao, P. K. (1954 b). Maintenance of the killer trait by kk animals in Paramecium aurelia, variety 4. Microb. Genet. Bull. 11, 11–12.Google Scholar
Chao, P. K. (1955). Hereditary modification of the action of macronuclear k genes in the maintenance of the killer trait in variety 4 of Paramecium aurelia. Ree. Genet. Soc. Am. 24, 547.Google Scholar
Dickman, S. R., Aroskar, J. P. & Kropf, R. B. (1956). Activation and inhibition of beef pancreas ribonuclease. Biochim. biophys. Acta 21, 539–545.Google Scholar
Dryl, S. (1959). Antigenic transformation in Paramecium aurelia after homologous antiserum treatment during autogamy and conjugation. J. Protozool. (Suppl.) 6, 25.Google Scholar
Gibson, I. (1965). The replication of metagons and mu particles from Paramecium in another cell-Didinium. Genet. Res. 6, 398–410.Google Scholar
Gibson, I. & Beale, G. H. (1961). Genie basis of the mate-killer trait in Paramecium aurelia, stock 540. Genet. Rea. 2, 82–91.Google Scholar
Gibson, I. & Beale, G. H. (1962). The mechanism whereby the genes M 1 and M 2 in Paramecium aurelia, stock 540, control growth of the mate-killer (mu) particle. Genet. Res. 3, 24–50.Google Scholar
Gibson, I. & Beale, G. H. (1963). The action of ribonuclease and 8-azaquanine on mate-killer paramecia. Genet. Res. 4, 42–54.Google Scholar
Gibson, I. & Beale, G. H. (1964). Infection into paramecia of metagons derived from other mate-killer paramecia. Genet. Res. 5, 85–106.Google Scholar
Gibson, I. & Sonneborn, T. M. (1964). Is the metagon an mRNA in Paramecium and a virus in Didinium? Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 52, 869–876.Google Scholar
Hanson, E. (1957). Some aspects of the quantitative study of cytoplasmic particles: mixed population of kappa in Paramecium aurelia, variety 4. J. exp. Zool. 135, 29–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preer, J. R. Jr. (1948). A study of some properties of the cytoplasmic factor, ‘kappa’ in Paramecium aurelia, variety 2. Genetics 33, 349–404.Google Scholar
Reeve, E. C. R. & Ross, G. J. S. (1962). Mate-killer (mu) particles in Paramecium aurelia: the metagon division hypothesis. Genet. Res. 3, 328–330.Google Scholar
Smith-Sonneborn, J. & Van Wagtendonk, W. J. (1964). Purification and chemical characterization of kappa in stock 51, Paramecium aurelia. Expl Cell Res. 37, 569–581.Google Scholar
Sonneborn, T. M. (1965). The metagon: RNA and cytoplasmic inheritance, Am. Naturalist XCIC, 297–307.Google Scholar
Widmayer, D. (1966). Search for metagon activity for kappa's maintenance in stock 51m43 of Paramecium aurelia. Am. Zool. 6, 589.Google Scholar
Yeung, K. K. (1965). Maintenance of kappa particles in cells recently deprived of gene K (stock 51, syngen 4) of Paramecium aurelia. Genet. Res. 6, 411–418.Google Scholar