Hostname: page-component-7d8f8d645b-r82c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-05-28T19:24:41.744Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false
  • English

The growth of mice selected for large and small size in relation to food intake and the efficiency of conversion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

R. C. Roberts
R. C. Roberts
Affiliation:
ARC Unit of Animal Genetics, Institute of Animal Genetics, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Summary

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Mice selected for large size show increases in both food intake and efficiency, and small mice show decreases in both. This is true whether the comparisons are made at the same age or at the same weight. Food intake and efficiency contributed more or less equally to the responses to selection for growth. Mice seem to regulate their food intake to a certain level of energy. On suspension of a period of food restriction, mice ate the same amount as others of the same strain that had not been restricted, and which were bigger. At the same time, they converted it more efficiently than the mice which had been full-fed throughout, because of a linear negative association between efficiency and body weight. Thus, following restriction, mice eat as much as bigger mice of the same age, and convert it as efficiently as younger mice of the same weight. The product of these two effects gives rise to rapid (compensatory) growth.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , August 1981 , pp. 9 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

References

REFERENCES

Allden, W. G. (1968). Undernutrition of the Merino sheep and its sequelae. I. The growth and development of lambs following prolonged periods of nutritional stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 621–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allden, W. G. (1970). The effects of nutritional deprivation on the subsequent productivity of sheep and cattle. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 40, 1167–1184.Google ScholarPubMed
Eisen, E. J., Bakker, H. & Nagai, J. (1977). Body composition and energetic efficiency in two lines of mice selected for rapid growth rate and their F1 crosses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 49, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisen, E. J. & Bandy, T. (1977). Correlated responses in growth and body composition of replicated single-trait and index selected lines of mice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 49, 133–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1973). Replicated selection for body weight in mice. Genetical Research 22, 291–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, J. F. & McCarthy, J. C. (1976). The effects of selection at different ages for high and low body weight on the pattern of fat deposition in mice. Genetical Research 27, 389–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPhee, C. P., Trappett, P. C., Neill, A. R. & Duncalfe, F. (1980). Changes in growth, appetite, food conversion efficiency and body composition in mice selected for high post-weaning weight gain on restricted feeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 57, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priestley, G. C. & Robertson, M. S. M. (1973). Protein and nucleic acid metabolism in organs from mice selected for larger and smaller body size. Genetical Research 22, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radcliffe, J. D. & Webster, A. J. F. (1976). Regulation of food intake during growth in fatty and lean female Zucker rats given diets of different protein content. British Journal of Nutrition, 36, 457–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, R. C. (1979). Side effects of selection for growth in laboratory animals. Livestock Production Science 6, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saubidet, C. L. & Verde, L. S. (1976). Relationship between liveweight, age and dry matter intake for beef cattle after different levels of food restriction. Animal Production 22, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanier, M. W. & Mount, L. E. (1972). Growth rate, food intake and body composition before and after weaning in strains of mice selected for mature body weight. British Journal of Nutrition 28, 307–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutherland, T. M., Biondini, P. E., Haverland, L. H., Pettus, D. & Owen, W. B. (1970). Selection for rate of gain, appetite and efficiency of feed utilization in mice. Journal of Animal Science 31, 1049–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timon, V. M. & Eisen, E. J. (1970). Comparisons of ad libitum and restricted feeding of mice selected and unselected for postweaning gain. I. Growth, feed consumption and feed efficiency. Genetics 64, 41–57.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. (1977). Selection for leanness and the energetic efficiency of growth in meat animals. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yüksel, E. (1979). Genetic aspects of the efficiency of food utilization in some farm and laboratory animals. Animal Breeding Abstracts 47, 499–504.Google Scholar