Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T10:22:57.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effective population size: the effects of sex, genotype, and density on the mean and variance of offspring numbers in the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Michael J. Wade
Michael J. Wade
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Chicago

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper I present the results of an experimental study of the effects of genotype and density on the mean and variance of offspring numbers in both sexes of the flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. From the observed variance in offspring numbers the effective population size at several different densities is estimated using the methods of Crow & Morton (1955).

I found that both the mean and variance of offspring numbers varied with genotype and density. In general, males were more variable in offspring numbers than females and this variability increased with density. Individuals homozygous for the black body colour mutant, b/b, were less variable in offspring numbers than + / + individuals, but the latter produced more offspring at most densities. As density increased, + / + individuals became more variable in offspring numbers whereas b/b individuals were less sensitive in this regard. These findings are discussed in relation to the ecology of selection at the black and closely linked loci.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , August 1980 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

REFERENCES

Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. (1970). Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Crow, J. F. & Morton, N. E. (1955). Measurement of gene frequency drift in small populations. Evolution 9, 202–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. & Wright, S. (1941). Genetics of natural populations. V. Relations between mutation rate and accumulation of lethals in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 26, 23–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, W. E. & Wright, S. (1954). Experimental studies of the distribution of gene frequencies in very small populations of Drosophila melanogaster I. Forked. Evolution 8, 172–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1955). The effects of population density and competition on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 9, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. & Matsuo, Y. (1963). Interaction of genotypes determining viability in Drosophila busckii. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 49, 270–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCauley, D. E. & Sokal, R. R. (1977). Fitness components estimated from population budgets of genotypic mixtures and hybrid populations of Tribolium. Genetica 47, 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prout, T. (1954). Genetic drift in irradiated experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetcis 39, 529–545.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Huber, I. (1963). Competition among genotypes in Tribolium castaneum at varying densities and gene frequencies (the sooty locus). The American Naturalist 97, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Karten, I. (1964). Competition among genotypes in Tribolium castaneum at varying densities and gene frequencies (the black locus). Genetics 49, 195–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1969). Biometry. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Sonleitner, F. J. (1968). The ecology of selection in hybrid populations of Tribolium castaneum. Ecological Monographs 38, 345–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Sullivan, R. L. (1963). Competition between mutant and wild type house fly strains at varying densities. Ecology 44, 314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokoloff, A., Slatis, H. M. & Stanley, J. (1960). The black mutation in Tribolium castaneum. Journal of Heredity 51, 131–135.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R. L. & Sokal, R. R. (1963). The effects of larval density on several strains of the house fly. Ecology 44, 120–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, M. J. (1977). An experimental study of group selection. Evolution 31, 134–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, M. J. (1979). Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. The American Naturalist 114, 742–747.Google Scholar
Wade, M. J. & McCauley, D. E. (1980). Group selection: the phenotypic and genotypic differentiation of small populations. Evolution. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Wade, M. J. & Arnold, S. J. (1980). The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behaviour, female choice, and sperm precedence. Animal Behaviour 28, 446–461.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16, 97–159.Google Scholar