Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T06:54:20.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differences in bristle-making abilities in scute and wild-type Drosophila melanogaster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

S. S. Y. Young
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Division of Animal Genetics, Delhi Road, North Ryde, N.S.W., Australia
R. C. Lewontin
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University of Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Difference in bristle-making abilities in extreme scute and in wild-type Drosophila were investigated using flies mosaic for the two kinds of tissues. It was found that both wild-type and scute tissues were autonomous with respect to bristle differentiation. From the experimental evidence it was postulated that the differences in bristle-making abilities between the two genotypes might be due to differences in tissue competence rather than differences in pre-pattern or in level of bristle-making substances.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

References

REFERENCES

Brown, S. W. & Hannah, H. (1952) An induced maternal effect on the stability of the ring X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 38, 687693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubinin, N. P. (1933). Step-allelomorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. 27, 443464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendel, J. M. (1959). Canalization of the scute phenotype of Drosophila. Evolution, 31, 425439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendel, J. M. (1962). Correlation between the number of scutellar and abdominal bristles in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 48, 391408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendel, J. M. (1965). Bristle pattern in scute stocks of Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 99, 2532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. (1965). Variation in scutellar bristle number—an alternative hypothesis. Am. Nat. 99, 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, C. (1954). Two or three bristles. Am. Scient. 42, 213247.Google Scholar
Smith, J. Maynard & Sondhi, K. C. (1960). The genetics of a pattern. Genetics, 45, 10391050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sturtevant, A. H. (1932). The use of mosaics in the study of the developmental effects of genes. Proc. 6th Int. Congr. Genet. 1, 304307.Google Scholar
Waddington, C. H. (1962). New Patterns in Genetics and Development. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar