Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T15:42:07.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age differences between distributions of genotypes among pregnant women: evidence of fertility selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

A. Gimelfarb  and
E. Bottini
A. Gimelfarb*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolution, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
E. Bottini
Affiliation:
Division of Biometry and Human Development, School of Medicine, 2nd University of Rome, Rome, Italy
*
* Corresponding author.

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The number of children produced by a modern woman is usually below her total reproductive capacity and is determined by circumstances other than natural selection. It is, therefore, practically impossible to detect differences in natural fertilities associated with different types (e.g. phenotypes, genotypes) of women. This does not mean, however, that natural selection at the reproductive level cannot at all be detected today. If women of a particular type have high natural fertility, this usually means that they reproduce (become pregnant) at a higher rate than women of a type with lower natural fertility. Hence, when there is a limit on the number of children, women of the first type will reach the limit at an earlier age than women of the second type. As a result, types that have a higher natural fertility should be overrepresented among pregnant women of younger ages and, consequently, underrepresented among older ones, as compared to types with a lower natural fertility. Based on this notion, a model of age-related differences between distributions of types among pregnant women is suggested. The model is applied to data on MNSs-blood group and PGM1 (phosphoglucomutase) types in a sample of pregnant women and an evidence of natural selection at the reproduction level associated with these genetic markers is obtained.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , June 1989 , pp. 207 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

Bottini, E., Bonci, E., Gloria-Bottini, F., Nicotra, M., Carapella, E., Coghi, N., Lucarini, M., Martini, P. A., Paris, D., Bonci, M. & Finocchi, G. (1987). MNSs genetic polymorphism and intrauterine selection through habitual abortion. Human Biology 59, 103–210.Google ScholarPubMed
Bottini, E., Gerlini, G., Fallucca, F., Lucarini, N., Bonci, E., Arachi, S. & Gloria-Bottini, F. (1985). Diabetic pregnancy: fetal development and maternal phosphoglucomutase phenotype. Disease Markers 3, 83–89.Google Scholar
Dati sulle caratteristiche strutturali della popolazione e delle abitazioni. (1985). In Censimento Generale della Popolazione, 25 ottobre 1981. Istituto Centrale di Statistica, Roma.Google Scholar
Gloria-Bottini, F., Lucarini, N., Bonci, E., Pascasio, F., Bonci, M., Assumma, M. & Scalamandre, A. (1986). Genetic polymorphism and intrauterine development: the role of maternal PGM1 and MNSs genotypes. American Journal of Diseases of Children 49, 324–327.Google Scholar
Hopkinson, D. A. & Harris, H. (1968). A third phosphoglucomutase locus in man. Annals of Human Genetics 31, 359–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Indagine sui nuclei familiari (1982). In Collana d'Informazioni. Istituto Centrale di Statistica, Roma.Google Scholar
Modiano, G., Scozzari, R., Gigliani, F., Santolamazza, C., Afeltra, P. & Frattoli, W. (1970). Red cell phosphoglucomutase polymorphism. I. Enzyme activity of different cell PGM phenotypes. Human Heredity 20, 86–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Race, R. R. & Sanger, R. (1975). The MNSs blood groups. In Blood Groups in Man, 6th edn, pp. 92–138. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spencer, N., Hopkinson, D. A. & Harris, H. (1964). Phosphoglucomutase polymorphism in man. Nature 21, 742–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. G. R. (1969). Epistatic selection in the rhesus and MNSs blood groups. Annals of Human Genetics 33, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar