Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:14:06.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MONOID ACTIONS AND ULTRAFILTER METHODS IN RAMSEY THEORY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2019

SŁAWOMIR SOLECKI*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Malott Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; ssolecki@cornell.edu

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

First, we prove a theorem on dynamics of actions of monoids by endomorphisms of semigroups. Second, we introduce algebraic structures suitable for formalizing infinitary Ramsey statements and prove a theorem that such statements are implied by the existence of appropriate homomorphisms between the algebraic structures. We make a connection between the two themes above, which allows us to prove some general Ramsey theorems for sequences. We give a new proof of the Furstenberg–Katznelson Ramsey theorem; in fact, we obtain a version of this theorem that is stronger than the original one. We answer in the negative a question of Lupini on possible extensions of Gowers’ Ramsey theorem.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author 2019

References

Bartošová, D. and Kwiatkowska, A., ‘Gowers’ Ramsey Theorem with multiple operations and dynamics of the homeomorphism group of the Lelek fan’, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 150 (2017), 108136.Google Scholar
Bergelson, V., Blass, A. and Hindman, N., ‘Partition theorems for spaces of variable words’, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 68 (1994), 449476.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, H. and Katznelson, Y., ‘Idempotents in compact semigroups and Ramsey theory’, Israel J. Math. 68 (1989), 257270.Google Scholar
Gowers, W. T., ‘Lipschitz functions on classical spaces’, European J. Combin. 13 (1992), 141151.Google Scholar
Hindman, N. and Strauss, D., Algebra in the Stone–Čeach Compactification, de Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics, 27 (Walter de Gruyter, 1998).Google Scholar
Hubička, J. and Nešetřil, J., ‘All those Ramsey classes (Ramsey classes with closures and forbidden homomorphisms)’. Preprint, 2016, submitted.Google Scholar
Kechris, A. S., Pestov, V. G. and Todorcevic, S., ‘Fraïssé limits, Ramsey theory, and topological dynamics of automorphism groups’, Geom. Funct. Anal. 15 (2005), 106189.Google Scholar
Khatchatourian, I. and Pawliuk, M., ‘Almost R-trivial monoids are almost never Ramsey’. Preprint, 2018.Google Scholar
Kurepa, Ð., ‘Ensembles ordonnés et ramifiés’, Publ. Math. Univ. Belgrade 4 (1935), 1138.Google Scholar
Lupini, M., ‘Gowers’ Ramsey theorem for generalized tetris operations’, J. Combin Theory Ser. A 149 (2017), 101114.Google Scholar
Lupini, M., ‘Actions of trees on semigroups, and an infinitary Gowers–Hales–Jewett Ramsey theorem’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. to appear.Google Scholar
Schocker, M., ‘Radical of weakly ordered semigroup algebras’, J. Algebraic Combin. 28 (2008), 231234.Google Scholar
Solecki, S., ‘Abstract approach to finite Ramsey theory and a self-dual Ramsey theorem’, Adv. Math. 248 (2013), 11561198.Google Scholar
Steinberg, B., The Representation Theory of Finite Monoids, (Universitext, Springer, 2016).Google Scholar
Todorcevic, S., ‘Partition relations for partially ordered sets’, Acta Math. 155 (1985), 125.Google Scholar
Todorcevic, S., Introduction to Ramsey Spaces, Annals of Mathematics Studies, 174 (Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2010).Google Scholar