Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T20:53:25.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in Growth Among 13 Prosopis (mesquite) Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Peter Felker ,
G. H. Cannell  and
Peter R. Clark
Peter Felker
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521
G. H. Cannell
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521
Peter R. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Mesquite (Prosopis spp) is a nitrogen-fixing and drought-resistant leguminous tree which exists in many of the semi-arid regions of the world but little has been done to develop its potential for wood, nitrogen fixation or pod yield. We report field and greenhouse cultural practices for mesquite and the results of a field screening trial for biomass production of 32 accessions, representing North and South American and African germplasm. Non-destructive biomass estimates, derived from height and stem diameter measurements, had a 180-fold range; the preponderance of slow-growing accessions were from the rangelands of southwestern USA.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1981 , pp. 209 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmed, G. (1961). Evaluation of dry zone afforestation plots. Pakistan Journal of Forestry 00:168–175.Google Scholar
Burkart, A. (1976). A monograph of the genus Prosopis (Leguminosae: subfam. Mimosoideae). Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 57:217–249 and 450–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, G. H. & Asbell, C. W. (1964). Prefabrication of mold and construction of cylindrical electrode type resistance units. Soil Science 97:108–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felker, P. (1979). Mesquite: an all purpose leguminous arid land tree. In New Agricultural Crops (Ed. Ritchie, G. A.), pp. 89–132. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Symp. Vol. 38. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hanover, J. W. & Riecosky, D. A. (1972). Accelerated growth for early testing of spruce seedlings. Forestry Science 18:92–94.Google Scholar
Hunziker, J. H., Poggio, L., Naranjo, C. A., Palacios, R. A. & Andrada, A. B. (1975). Cytogenetics of some species and natural hybrids in Prosopis (Leguminosae). Canadian Journal Genetics and Cytology 17:253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsolver, J. M., Johnson, C. D., Swier, S. R. & Teran, A. (1977). Prosopis fruits as a resource for invertebrates. Mesquite: Its biology in two desert ecosystems (Ed. Simpson, B. B.), pp. 108–122. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Dowden Hutchinson & Ross.Google Scholar
Parker, K. W. & Martin, S. G. (1952). The mesquite problem on the southern Arizona range. USDA Circ. 968, 70 pp.Google Scholar
Salinas, H. E. & Sanchez, S. G. (1971). Estudio del tamarugo como productor de alimento del ganado lanar en la pampa del tamarugal. Informe Technico No. 38, Instituto Forestal, Seccion Silvicultura, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
Simpson, B. B. (1977). Breeding systems of dominant perennial plants of two disjunct warm desert ecosystems. Oecologia, Berlin 27:203–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiley, A. T. & Manwiler, F. G. (1976). Market potential of mesquite as a fuel. Forest Products Journal 26:48–51.Google Scholar
Whisenant, S. G. & Burzlaff, D. F. (1978). Predicting green weight of mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa torr.). Journal of Range Management 31:396–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. & Marks, P. L. (1975). Methods of assessing terrestrial productivity. In Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. (Ed. Lieth, H.Whittaker, R. H.), pp. 56–118. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar