Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T01:38:41.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INTENSIFICATION PATHWAY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF SMALLHOLDER CASSAVA PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN SOUTHERN CÔTE D'IVOIRE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2016

JEAN-BAPTISTE GNÉLIÉ GNAHOUA*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium Department of Soil Science, Felix Houphouet-Boigny University, 22 BP 582 Abidjan 22, Côte d'Ivoire Department of Soil Science, Earth Science Unit, Felix Houphouet-Boigny University, 22 BP 582 Abidjan 22, Côte d'Ivoire
DJÉTCHI JEAN BAPTISTE ETTIEN
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Earth Science Unit, Felix Houphouet-Boigny University, 22 BP 582 Abidjan 22, Côte d'Ivoire
BONI N'ZUÉ
Affiliation:
Tuber and Root Crops Program, National Agronomic Research Center (CNRA), 01 BP 1740 Abidjan 01, Côte d'Ivoire
CATHÉRINE EBAH
Affiliation:
Food Technologies Laboratory, National Agronomic Research Center (CNRA), 01 BP 1740 Abidjan 01, Côte d'Ivoire
BRAHIMA KONÉ
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, Earth Science Unit, Felix Houphouet-Boigny University, 22 BP 582 Abidjan 22, Côte d'Ivoire
STEFAAN DE NEVE
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Management, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium
PASCAL BOECKX
Affiliation:
Isotope Bioscience Laboratory - ISOFYS, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium
*
Corresponding author. Email: baptistegnelie@yahoo.fr

Summary

In order to intensify cassava production in southern Côte d'Ivoire, multiple farmers’ field trials were carried out in two important cassava-producing areas (Dabou and Bingerville). The effectiveness of an Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) approach as intensification pathway was evaluated for poor sandy soils. Overall, ISFM-based systems outperformed the local cultivation system. The average cassava yield was 14.5 and 6.5 t ha−1 and 12.6 and 5.7 t ha−1 for the ISFM and traditional systems, in Dabou and Bingerville, respectively. The average profitability of ISFM systems was ca. 2500 Euro ha−1, whereby 66% was generated by cowpea intercrop, which yielded on average 3.1 t ha−1. Taking into account the limited farmer's resource endowment and poor soil fertility, ISFM is a crucial component for sustainable intensification of cassava production and poverty alleviate in southern Côte d'Ivoire.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abd El-Baky, M. M. H., Ahmed, A. A., El-Nerm, M. A. and Zaki, M. F. (2010). Effect of potassium fertilizer and foliar zinc application on yield and quality of sweet potato. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6:386394.Google Scholar
Agwu, A. E. and Anyaeche, C. L. (2007). Adoption of improved cassava varieties in six rural communities in Anambra State, Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 6:089098.Google Scholar
Amanullah, M., Alagesan, K., Vaiyapuri, K., Sathyamoorthy, K. and Pazhanivelan, S. (2006). Effect of intercropping and manures on weed control and performance of cassava(Manihot esculenta Crantz). Journal of Agronomy 5:589594.Google Scholar
ANADER (Agence Nationale de Développement Rural). (2014). Bulletin d'information du programme de productivité agricole en Afrique de l'ouest (PPAAO/WAAPP) Côte d'Ivoire. No. 11, 8.Google Scholar
Anyaegbu, P. O., Ezeibekwe, I. O., Amaechi, E. C. C. and Omaliko, C. P. E. (2009). Cassava production systems improved with groundnut and poultry manure. Report and Opinion 2:2631.Google Scholar
Burns, A., Gleadow, R., Cliff, J., Zacaria, A. and Cavagnaro, T. (2010). Cassava: the drought, war and famine crop in a changing world. Sustainability 2:35723607.Google Scholar
Cadavid, L. F., El-Sharkawy, M. A., Acosta, A. and Sanchez, T. (1998). Long-term effects of mulch, fertilization and tillage on cassava grown in sandy soils in north Colombia. Field Crops Research 57:4556.Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations). (2014). FAOSTAT 2013. Accessed 20 November 2014. Available: http//www.fao.org.Google Scholar
Fasinmirin, J. T. and Reichert, J. M. (2011). Conservation tillage for cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) production in the tropics. Soil & Tillage Research 113:110.Google Scholar
Hahn, S. K., Terry, E. R. and Leuschner, K. (1980). Breeding cassava for resistance to cassava mosaic disease. Euphytica 29:673683.Google Scholar
Howeler, R. H. (1991). Long-term effect of cassava cultivation on soil productivity. Field Crops Research 26:118.Google Scholar
Iyagba, A. G. (2010). A review on root and tuber crop production and their weed management among small scale farmers in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5:5258.Google Scholar
Leihner, D. E., Rupenthal, M., Hilger, T. H. and Castillo, J. A. (1996). Soil conservation effectiveness and crop productivity of forage legume intercropping, contour grass barriers and contour ridging in cassava on Andean hillsides. Experimental Agricultural 32:327338.Google Scholar
Nyi, T., Mucheru-Muna, M., Shisanya, C., Lama, J. P. L., Mutuo, P. K., Pypers, P. and Vanlauwe, B. (2014). Effect of delayed cassava planting on yields and economic returns of a cassava-groundnut intercrop in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Journal of Agricultural Research 2:101108.Google Scholar
Pansu, M. and Gautheyrou, J. (2003). L'analyse du sol - Minéralogique, Organique et Minérale, 995, 2ème edn. Paris: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Tittonell, P. and Giller, K. E. (2013). When yield gaps are poverty traps: the paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Research 143:7690.Google Scholar
USS Working Group WRB. (2014). World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports. No. 106. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Vanlauwe, B., Bationo, A., Chianu, J., Giller, K. E., Merchx, R., Mokwunye, U., Ohiopkehai, O., Pypers, P., Tabo, R., Shepherd, K., Smaling, E., Woomer, P. L. and Sanginga, N. (2010). Integrated soil fertility management-operational definition and consequence for implementation and dissemination. Outlook on Agricultural 39:1724.Google Scholar
Vanlauwe, B., Coyne, G., Gockowski, J., Hauser, S., Huising, J., Masso, C., Nziguheba, G., Schut, M. and Van Asten, P. (2014). Sustainable intensification and the African smallholder farmer. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 8:1522.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gnahoua supplementary material

Supplementary Table

Download Gnahoua supplementary material(File)
File 84.5 KB