Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T22:51:29.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth Phases in Plants and their Bearing on Agronomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

G. Watts Padwick
G. Watts Padwick
Affiliation:
Previously of Plant Protection Ltd, Fernhurst, Haslemere, Surrey, England, and ICI, America†
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Future research in agronomy will doubtless lay stress on the efficient use of inputs by applying them during the most appropriate development phases of the plant, and by modifying those phases, which in some cases can now be well defined. The plant can often be influenced or stimulated well before the effect commences, storing the stimulus for the future, and the terms ‘Receptive Phase’ and ‘Responsive Phase’ are proposed to describe these stages. To apply research most effectively, receptive phases should be delimited and linked with responsive phases in a way convenient for the agronomist. Schematic diagrams can be prepared relating growth phases to field appearance, as is illustrated by examples based on cotton, rice, maize and apple.

Type
Articles
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 15 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arndt, C. H. (1937). Plant Phys. 12, 703.Google Scholar
Balls, W. L. (1953). The Yields of a Crop. London: Spon.Google Scholar
Berger, J. (1969). The World's Major Fiber Crops. Zurich: Centre de l'Etude de l'Azote.Google Scholar
Brown, H. B. & Ware, J. O. (1958). Cotton. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fleckinger, J. (undated). Phénologie et Arboriculture Fruitiére. Bon Jardiniere, Tome 1, 362.Google Scholar
Gregory, F. G. & Purvis, O. N. (1938). Ann. Bot. N. S. 2, 237.Google Scholar
Hall, V. L., Sims, J. L. & Johnston, T. H. (1968). Agron. J. 60, 450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, W. S. (1969). In The Physiology of Plant Growth and Development, 557 (Ed. Wilkins, M. B.). London: McGraw-Hill Book.Google Scholar
Kiesselbach, T. A. (1949). Res. Bull Univ. Nebr. Agric. Exper. Stat. 161.Google Scholar
Landsberg, J. J. (1977a). Grower 1279.Google Scholar
Landsberg, J. J. (1977b). J. Roy. Agric. Soc. England, 138, 116.Google Scholar
Matsubayashi, M., Ito, R., Nomoto, T., Takase, T. & Yamada, N. (1963). Theory and Practice of Growing Rice. Tokyo: Fuji Publ.Google Scholar
Milthorpe, F. L. & Moorby, J. (1974) An Introduction to Crop Physiology. Camb. Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Murata, Y. & Matsushima, S. (1975). In Crop Physiology, some Case Histories, 73 (Ed. Evans, L. T.). Camb. Univ. Press.Google Scholar
White, H. C. (1914). The Feeding of Cotton, II. Gezira Agric. Exper. Sta. Bull. 114.Google Scholar
Yoshida, S. (1977). In Ecophysiology of Tropical Crops, 57 (Ed. Alvin, P. de T. and Kozlowski, T. T.). New York: Acad. Press.Google Scholar