Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T04:20:42.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foliar Diagnosis of Nutrient Deficiencies in Mauritius Sugar Cane I. Changes in Optimum Leaf Nitrogen with Ecological Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

P. Nababsing  and
P. Halais
P. Nababsing
Affiliation:
Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute, Réduit, Mauritius
P. Halais
Affiliation:
Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute, Réduit, Mauritius
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The response of six cane varieties to nitrogen fertilization (0, 70 and 140 kg. N/ha.) has been studied. Results of three ratoon crops from 23 trials on representative sites throughout Mauritius indicate that optimum fertilization is around 70 kg. N/ha. Three levels for optimum nitrogen in the third leaf blade have been established, namely 1·93, 2·05 and 2·22 per cent corresponding roughly to the sub-humid, humid and super-humid areas of Mauritius.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 1974 , pp. 161 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cano, R. R. (1962). Proc. 11th Congr. I.S.S.C.T.,Mauritius, 91.Google Scholar
Davies, W. H. L. & Vlitos, A. J. (1968). Proc. 13th Congr. I.S.S.C.T.,Taiwan, 68.Google Scholar
Du Torr, J. L. (1960). Proc. 10th Congr. I.S.S.C.T.,Hawaii, 432.Google Scholar
Evans, H. (1965). Proc. 12th Congr. I.S.S.C.T.,Puerto Rico, 156.Google Scholar
Farquhar, R. H. (1965). Proc. 12th Congr. I.S.S.C.T.,Puerto Rico, 227.Google Scholar
Halais, P. (1962). Ann. Rep. Sug. Ind. Res. Inst., Mauritius, 55.Google Scholar
Innes, R. F. (1959). Span 2, 98.Google Scholar
Innes, R. F. & Shaw, M. E. A. (1965). Proc. 12th Congr. I.S.S.C.T.,Puerto Rico, 390.Google Scholar
Lakshmikanthan, M. et al. , (1962). Proc. 11th Congr. I.S.S.C.T.,Mauritius, 238.Google Scholar
Portales, R. (1962). Proc. 11th Congr. I.S.S.C.T.,Mauritius, 222.Google Scholar
Shih-Chung, Wang & Kai-Yuan, Li (1960). Proc. 10th Congr. I.S.S.C.T.,Hawaii, 424.Google Scholar
Tabayoyong, F. T. (1958). Proc. Phil. Sug. Tech. 6, 38.Google Scholar
Vallance, L. G. et al. , (1963). Ann. Rep. Bureau of Sugar Exp. Stations, Queensland, 17.Google Scholar
Vlitos, A. J. & Lawrie, I. D. (1963). Trop. Agric. 40, 173.Google Scholar
Ward, G. M. & Johnston, F. B. (1960). Chemical Methods of Plant Analysis, Canada Dep. Agric. Pub. 1064.Google Scholar