Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T23:07:32.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fertilizer Trials on Cotton and Other Annual Crops on Small Farms in Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

D. Stephens
D. Stephens
Affiliation:
Kawanda Research Station, Department of Agriculture, Uganda*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In 1963 and 1964 a total of 290 cotton trials, 78 groundnut trials and 51 finger millet trials were conducted on small farms in Uganda to determine the effects and profitability of applying ammonium sulphate and single superphosphate under local conditions. The organization and methods of these trials are described and their results discussed. Ammonium sulphate gave highly significant increases in millet and cotton yields, whilst superphosphate produced similar results on groundnuts but was less effective on cotton and unprofitable on millet. Recommendations are made for groundnuts and millet, but a further season's results are thought necessary before recommending fertilizer treatments for cotton. Soil and leaf samples were taken from the trials and analysed, and relevant agronomic field data were recorded. The correlations of these factors with trial yields and responses are discussed. In general, soil and leaf analyses have been disappointing in assessing responses to fertilizers, but these responses tend to be greater where better farming is practised.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , January 1968 , pp. 49 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atlas of Uganda (1962). Dept. of Lands and Surveys, Uganda.Google Scholar
Bridger, G. L., Boylan, D. R. & Markey, J. W. (1953). Anal. Chem. 25, 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butters, B. & Chenery, E. M. (1959). Analyst, 84, 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillier, P. & Prevot, P. (1960). Bull. Res. Council of Israel, 8D, 131.Google Scholar
Harrop, J. F. (1962). Atlas of Uganda, 22. Dept. of Lands and Surveys, Uganda.Google Scholar
D'Hoore, J. L. (1961). Soils Map of Africa. Sci. Council for Africa South of Sahara.Google Scholar
Langdale-Brown, I. (1960). Vegetation of Uganda, Res. Div. Mem. Series 2, No. 6. Dep. of Agric., Uganda.Google Scholar
Langdale-Brown, I. (1962). Atlas of Uganda, 24. Dept. of Lands and Surveys, Uganda.Google Scholar
Manning, H. L. & Griffith, G. ap (1949). E. Afr. Agric. J. 15, 87.Google Scholar
McMaster, D. N. (1962). A Subsistence Crop Geography of Uganda, World Land Use Survey Occasional Paper No. 2.Google Scholar
Mills, W. R. (1954). Proc. 2nd Inter. Afr. Soils Conf. III, 1133.Google Scholar
Nye, P. H. (1953). Emp. J. exp. Agric. 21, 176 and 262.Google Scholar
Nye, P. H. (1954). Emp. J. exp. Agric. 22, 42.Google Scholar
Ollier, C. D. & Harrop, J. F. (1959). Soils of the Eastern Province, Uganda, Res. Div. Mem. Series 1, No. 2. Dep. of Agric., Uganda.Google Scholar
Parsons, D. J. (1960). Systems of Agriculture, Res. Div. Mem. Series 3, Nos. 1–5. Dep. of Agric., Uganda.Google Scholar
Quenouille, M. H. (1959). Rapid Statistical Calculations. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. L. (1956). Outlook on Agric. 1, 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, D. (1960). Emp. J. exp. Agric. 28, 1.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. B. & Crowther, E. M. (1947). Memorandum on Colonial Fertilizer Experiments, Col. No. 214. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar